Archive through January 27, 2001

The ClubHouse: The Game II - Discussions: Game II Discussions: How do you make your voting decisions?: Archive January 20 - 27, 2001: Archive through January 27, 2001

Bamagirl

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 11:59 am Click here to edit this post

I have two in mind...I am sure you know!

Cammie

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 12:03 pm Click here to edit this post

Just hope the BGs know who to vote for!

Bamagirl

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 12:05 pm Click here to edit this post

OH after last night...I am sure the names I want will be up! LOL (crossing fingers)

Cammie

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 12:05 pm Click here to edit this post

Thanks for the get well wishes and welcome backs, by the way!!

You guys are great!

Moondance

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 12:07 pm Click here to edit this post

Cammie we are so happy you are with us!:)

Dilligaf

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 12:07 pm Click here to edit this post

We better stock up on the Pampers! I've never seen so many whiney ass babies!

Moondance

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 12:18 pm Click here to edit this post

Amen Pickle!

Wink

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 12:21 pm Click here to edit this post

Hope you don't mind Dilli but you inspired me.

Cammie

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 12:45 pm Click here to edit this post

Moon...((HUGS))

I might need some Pampers myself. I was laughing so hard I almost wet myself. Entertainment like this is hard to find!

Willi

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 12:51 pm Click here to edit this post

LOL Dilli.

I need the Pampers now too...LOL!

Dilligaf

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 01:46 pm Click here to edit this post

"Pampers" For The Players...."Depends" For The Spectators.....

I feel a banner coming on....

Luckygal

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 02:40 pm Click here to edit this post

Cammie, when I read those logs, I had TEARS. Poor Hostess1!!

What a hilarious mess though!!

Cammie

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 02:57 pm Click here to edit this post

Lucky, those chat logs are the best ever!


Juju Rocks!

Lancecrossfire

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 03:06 pm Click here to edit this post

Luckgal, I'm creating a message to cover ideas about last night. Long post, an will create a new thread as it spans so many ideas and so many people.

One of the issues to cover is Hostess1 and her having to choose between stopping everything right off the bat and telling them how the debate would proceed, or letting them see what they came up with on their own. In my opinion, there are advantages to both and disadvantages to both. Much like when she had to decide about letting them vote over when Cammie was sick. She could have made them stick with their votes.

I reserve my opinion for the post I'm creating, although would like to say that every choice the hostess makes changes the outcome of the game from that point on (heck, just look at how it would be different if she had made them stick with their votes). That is the nature of the job of hostess (right Lisa?)

Much like the coach of a team who has a player run into a big snag in their game, I believe hostess may have asked herself, do I intervene, or do I let them see how they handle it. Just an opinion that was her approach. I've seen her post here before, so if she sees this and chooses to answer, cool. If she wants to keep that to herself for now, that is cool too.

Or, I could be all wet, and she was hungry and went out for Chinese food.

Norwican

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 03:20 pm Click here to edit this post

Look out Lance... you're teetering on the border of "Elitist's Land of Over-Analysis" j/k

Hostess1

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 03:21 pm Click here to edit this post

Ding Ding Ding!

Lance, wondering about Hostess during non-debate:

"do I intervene, or do I let them see how they handle it"

And, do we see sides of them that, until now, they've carefully hidden?

Lancecrossfire

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 04:03 pm Click here to edit this post

Nor, yes, I do analyze, even if you are just kidding. And sometimes I over analyze...I rarely under-analyze though. It was a fair statement on your part.

Hostess1--I thought I saw you say in the middle of the mayhem at one point something about wanting to see what they do. Wasn't sure though. Like I said, addressing it on the post I'm working on. I'll bid ado to this thread now and finish the other so everyone will have something to discuss/debate is they wish. Yes, it's a long post, so if you aren't into "reading to put you asleep", don't bother. haha

Bot, if the above is looked at as Elitist worthy of analysis, you guys are really going to go off on me.

Resortgirl

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 04:06 pm Click here to edit this post

I guess I would vote based on my gut instinct of who I don't really care for, who's annoying, or as I do in the Super Bowl, vote for the one with the cutest uniform. I have no idea who I would vote out at this point. When is voting again by the way?

Luckygal

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 04:19 pm Click here to edit this post

I'm pretty simple. Last one who somehow pisses me off gets voted for!

I like to think that I look much further than that, but I don't.

Digilady

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 08:15 pm Click here to edit this post

Help make your voting decisions now..

The DEBATE is on in CHAT!

Wink

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 09:03 pm Click here to edit this post

One of the BGs said last nite that she couldn't do the debate then because it was too late and she had to be up in six hours and then proceeded to stay for two more hours in the chat. When discussion arose about rescheduling the debate for tonite the same BG stated she would not be here. Surprise surprise. Those are the types of behaviours I take into consideration when it comes time to vote.

Moondance

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 09:15 pm Click here to edit this post

Amen Wink!

Tukuul

Friday, January 26, 2001 - 11:08 pm Click here to edit this post

Interesting segment:


<Interrogator> To return to what you said about people being who they are...just acting a little better...
<Azriel> nod
<Interrogator> would you apply the reverse to? asometimes acting worse than what they are really like?
<Azriel> yes
<Azriel> we have a prime example
<Azriel> Guru
<Interrogator> heh
<Azriel> he got in a role
<Azriel> a character
* Interrogator nods.
<Azriel> now it's hard to find his way out
<Interrogator> And people aren't always willing to let a person change after they have them pigeonholed?
<Azriel> right
<Azriel> not saying I think he is some lil angel you understand
<Azriel> he has a temper
<Interrogator> heh
<Interrogator> And here I thought you meant he was a lil angel. ;)

<Azriel> but I think he is a nice person

Bamagirl

Saturday, January 27, 2001 - 07:06 am Click here to edit this post

I saw that too Wink!!!

Tukuul

Saturday, January 27, 2001 - 10:59 am Click here to edit this post

This is one of the ways I make my decision. On what basis does Spam have to be slamming Merlin? I don't get it. Spam is off her rocker. Maybe nobody likes her because she IS being herself and nobody likes that either. lol! The only reason she likes Elitist is because he puts up with her shit. She likes everyone who will bow down to her and kiss her ass and tell her all the things she wants to hear.

From this morning's RR:


"If you were to suffocate one player (currently in the
game)with a bag until they pass out, who would it be? Would you use paper or plastic?


Spamgirl snaps:

Plastic. Merlin."