Archive through February 04, 2001

The ClubHouse: The Game II - Discussions: Game II Discussions: Red Room Sessions Falsified: Archive through February 04, 2001

Ocean_Islands

Saturday, February 03, 2001 - 09:29 pm Click here to edit this post

The spectators need to be aware that the Red Room sessions are fake.

As spectators of the Game, you may know that I am a writer and I take my words very seriously.

Please see my final post in the Game entited The Red Room Sessions, and compare it to Interrogator's edited version.

You will see that he attributed false emotions to me that in fact I did not express.

In addition, he added a question which was not posed, and said that I had not responded.

Serious questions must be answered about his purposes.

Twiggyish

Saturday, February 03, 2001 - 09:37 pm Click here to edit this post

I will go look!

Digilady

Saturday, February 03, 2001 - 09:59 pm Click here to edit this post

Man! OI you are truly a wonder. Fastest reader in these here parts.

Read all those RRs so quickly? You must have taken one of those speed-reading courses.

Ocean_Islands

Saturday, February 03, 2001 - 10:04 pm Click here to edit this post

I know my own words Digilady, I don't have to read everyone's to recognize bias when it's applied against me.

Spamgirl

Saturday, February 03, 2001 - 10:08 pm Click here to edit this post

And I was drunk...

get over it, OI... it didn't make you look any worse than the bias in certain supposedly factual recaps made Elitist or I look... in fact, I think you got off easy in comparison

Moondance

Saturday, February 03, 2001 - 10:11 pm Click here to edit this post

He also asked for your permission Spam before he did it...

Ocean_Islands

Saturday, February 03, 2001 - 10:16 pm Click here to edit this post

I'll get over it when I'm d&mn good and ready.

Lancecrossfire

Saturday, February 03, 2001 - 10:24 pm Click here to edit this post

OI, I can respect that thought---as it sounds like you will be getting over it. Your time schedule is fair.

Ocean_Islands

Saturday, February 03, 2001 - 10:28 pm Click here to edit this post

What is your view Lance. Please read my RRs as posted in the game (particularly the last 2 or 3) and then Interrogator's version.

Was this an honest representation?

Lancecrossfire

Saturday, February 03, 2001 - 10:33 pm Click here to edit this post

OI, I will look at both and give you my views. I know that I can be completely objective, and will look at yours only to make this comparison. I will look at all of them.

Misslibra

Sunday, February 04, 2001 - 02:26 am Click here to edit this post

I wish everyone would stop trying to tell Ocean how he should feel. When we look in the mirror we don't see Ocean we see ourselves, and some of us probably don't have any reflection at all ... hehehe

When he was in the game you had people telling him what he should, and shouldn't feel. And he comes out the game and people are still telling you how you should feel. I think if he feels his RR were edited to much he has a right to say so, without being told he is wrong for saying so.

Ocean, personally as far as my RR's went they needed all the help they could get.

Lalavoom

Sunday, February 04, 2001 - 02:30 am Click here to edit this post

feelings...
sounds like a song

Lalavoom

Sunday, February 04, 2001 - 02:36 am Click here to edit this post

baby, baby, baby,
it is time to take the thumb out of the mouth!
but hey,
if you feel you need that comfort...
suck away!
ha

Adven39

Sunday, February 04, 2001 - 05:19 am Click here to edit this post

For what it's worth, I felt the interrogator clearly edited Ocean's RR sessions, particularly the last few, in a way intended to make Ocean look silly and childish. Before Ocean even brought it up himself, I thought the interrogator was heading more toward backhanded commentary than acting as an unbiased administrator of the game. I have no objection to some of the editing - it was clever and funny and the interrogator's language stayed neutral- but, in this instance, I felt there was a quality to it that was unfair to Ocean and misrepresented what he was saying.

Ocean_Islands

Sunday, February 04, 2001 - 05:41 am Click here to edit this post

What is the difference between editing and falsifying?

The Interrogator tapes show that certain questions were inserted into my answers as if they had been posed to me when they were not; answers to those questions were falsified.

I'm truly amazed at the name-calling going on when, -- having already lost the game fair and square, -- some don't want me to make any commentary.

Go back to Game I and you'll see that I criticized Interrogator's editing then as well.

Nancy091158

Sunday, February 04, 2001 - 05:46 am Click here to edit this post

I agree with ML and Adven...its interesting how people say how one should feel or not feel...its His(or her) feelings and unless we walk in their shoes we should not discount feelings...

Ocean and spam and everyone else has a right to their feelings...and while we may disagree with their ideas or feelings it doesn't negate or make their feelings any less real...

Nancy091158

Sunday, February 04, 2001 - 05:51 am Click here to edit this post

HI OI!!

Its interesting the people ask for commentary and then jump down your(and spam's) throats when you give it...there is difference between creative editing and adding in answers...creative editing just adds in little asides(comments) made by gator...but to add in things is wrong as the gator can make you look any way he wants :(

Gail

Sunday, February 04, 2001 - 06:16 am Click here to edit this post

Hmmm . . . .Red room sessions falsified?

What's next? TuKuuL's Tabloid Trash trashed? 'Moondance's Mysterious Memoirs' muddy, Banners banned? Next thing you know, we will find out that the Amazing Game II Player Photo was not real either.

I guess I thought that all of the above were there for strictly entertainment value.

Dilligaf

Sunday, February 04, 2001 - 06:27 am Click here to edit this post

game \'gam\ n (derived from the word gaman meaning amusement) 1) activity engaged in for diversion or amusement; 2) often derisive or mocking, jesting; 3) fun, sport; 4) a procedure or strategy for gaining an end, tactic; 5) an illegal or shady scheme, maneuver, racket.

Merriam-Webster's Tenth Edition

Nuf said....

Nancy091158

Sunday, February 04, 2001 - 06:36 am Click here to edit this post

lol pickle :)

Dilligaf

Sunday, February 04, 2001 - 06:46 am Click here to edit this post

Hi Nancy...just wanted to take a minute and remind everyone "IT'S A DAMN GAME".

Digilady

Sunday, February 04, 2001 - 09:38 am Click here to edit this post

And who should know better, Mistress Pickle?

Well said.

Gail, again, spoke what I wish I'd said too!

OH NO Mr. BILL

A me-too post... hang her high

Nancy091158

Sunday, February 04, 2001 - 09:39 am Click here to edit this post

too true...howevuh(using my boston accent) i think(and correct me if i'm wrong since you were IN the game) that it feels much more than that from the inside??

:)

Ocean_Islands

Sunday, February 04, 2001 - 09:43 am Click here to edit this post

Of course it's a game.

And for my part none of this matters now; however, there are still four people in there and one of them is going to win.

Digilady

Sunday, February 04, 2001 - 09:46 am Click here to edit this post

Ach and ye played well, laddie. Too bad about the sudden work overload...

So! Predictions for 1, 2, and 3?