Lancecrossfire | Thursday, February 01, 2001 - 05:48 pm  I'm interested in hearing your opinions. Do you think it's right to vote about the game based on what a person has been like before the game? If so, why? If not, why not? |
Bamagirl | Thursday, February 01, 2001 - 06:09 pm  As for me Lance... I am going by what they do inside. I notice the ones posting or how they are inchat...how they work with others...that is how I am voting. |
Leap | Thursday, February 01, 2001 - 06:25 pm  I am with Bama. I am only going by what they do inside. However, this is difficult, sometimes it is hard to eliminate what you already know about a person from your voting decisions. |
Twiggyish | Thursday, February 01, 2001 - 06:52 pm  Absolutely based on how they act on the inside! A few of them have changed since being in the house. I like it when they open up. I look for a person who contributes to the game and who supports the other players. That is how I base my decisions. |
Willi | Friday, February 02, 2001 - 05:50 am  I am basing my opinion (especially as the Game goes on) on how they behave/interact/contribute to The Game. It was difficult to do this for the first vote even up to the second vote but now I find it easier to "get to know them" because of the quantity/quality of their posts/interactions inside The Game. |
Resortgirl | Friday, February 02, 2001 - 06:49 am  I go by what I see in the Game. I really didn't have many preconcieved notions about any of them from before. I guess maybe it's because I have a lousy memory. Guru was the only one I really saw outside that had a lasting impression, and he was kind of nasty, but he seems to have redeemed himself. One of his last redroom visits made me think he may be a pretty cool guy after all. |
Norwican | Friday, February 02, 2001 - 09:14 am  I'm trying to go strictly by how they are playing the game... and hope I'm succeeding. I suppose you really can't be sure what is creeping into your subconscious that may be affecting your opinions. |