*** How about this? ***
The ClubHouse: The Game II - Discussions: Pre-Game Discussions:
*** How about this? ***
Digilady | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 09:14 am  I've had an email which got me to thinking (always a dangerous thing.) HANG the vote and let all 12 of em play. What say ye? Start your response with YES or NO so I can easily count. Hint: voting will take one more day. Wheras, let me off the hook for writing that shit, and Game could start TOMORROW! |
Norwican | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 09:17 am  Yes, let all of 'em play |
Wink | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 09:21 am  YES, YES, YES, let the game begin!! |
Mishamisha | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 09:23 am  Yes, go for it! |
Merlin | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 09:41 am  I say yes, but under the condition you find out about good ol juju, male or female? Just for flaming purposes. |
Lancecrossfire | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 09:41 am  Yes, all 12 play. |
Soeur | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 09:47 am  YES! |
Newamush | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 09:48 am  I make it unanimous. It really shouldn't matter anyway, since I will win in the end. :-) |
Guruchaz | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 09:52 am  First of all, the posting volume was way too high in the last game. The public shouldn't expect people to live here and post for their amusement 24 hours a day. I won't name names but we all know a few who are skilled at doing that. Also, letting past players of Game I in the new game seems sort of desperate. It serves to only cheapen the experience since we already know most everything about them anyway. No offense to those individuals, but the planning here is getting ridiculous. |
Lancecrossfire | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 09:54 am  Newamush, nice touch at the end--good swagger! |
Juju2bigdog | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 10:01 am  Yes. Merlin: Nyah nyah nyah nah nah!! quit trying to look up my skirt. So, Gu, was that a yes or no?
 |
Lancecrossfire | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 10:04 am  Guru, that was another reason I didn't want to apply unless it meant the difference between having a game or not. I stated in a thread a long time ago that a game I player has already stated a heck of a lot about themselves, and it might get boring for the watchers to have to deal with that. So my intent to play again was only if there weren't enough applicants to hold the game. Moon and I had the highest number of posts, with me having just a few more than she did. For me, the time I spent wasn't out of feeling I had to post all day and night to have a chance. I posted all the time because of how much I liked playing. I would hope no player would feel they need to be at their computer all day and night for a chance to win. |
Spamgirl | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 10:59 am  No |
Newamush | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 12:38 pm  Lance: I hope we don't have to post often. The way my schedule is, I would probably be able to do more posting during the day than at nite. Does anyone think this will help with the game or hinder me? |
Lancecrossfire | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 12:55 pm  Newamush, I'm not sure, since this one will be set up differently than the first. As Guru pointed out after game I, a lessons learned was that there wasn't any right amount to post. There will always be someone thinking it's not enough and too much. Participation is what counts from my perspective (although I'm just one vote in the scheme of this whole thing). Helping with challenges counts, posting to discussion topics, although those can be addressed any time. Being there at night to some degree is cool from my perspective--again, just me. I think there is a minimum of chats that have to be attended, although that was covered in the application. Go with the flow and what you can give. I bet you'll be fine. |
Newamush | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 01:10 pm  Lance: Thanks for the advice. Evening would have to be planned for me in order to make sure I have the laptop at home. I don't take it home every night. I would be able to post and minimal chatting during the day, but as I said any mandatory evening events I would need to know in advance. Hope this all works out. |
Deedra | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 01:41 pm  YES, let them all play! |
Joni | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 01:44 pm  I vote for yes.. If I post too much tell me and I will make longer and fewer posts.. trust me.. I can talk a WHOLE lot |
Azriel | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 02:11 pm  No. Like Guru, I'm worried about the volume of posting and the spam in chat with that many people. Plus, I'm just a brat and want to make Digi work harder.  |
Digilady | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 02:37 pm  so far: shitload yes 2 or 3 nos. Y'all have till 8:00 PM Boardtime tonight to keep yessing and noing! |
Juju2bigdog | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 03:18 pm  Digi - you are the one doing massive amounts of work here. even if everyone votes yes, if you change your mind and want to go back to the vote, I am fine with that too. Just tell Merlin to keep out of my tutu.
 |
Joni | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 03:49 pm  Can I vote twice ??? |
Misslibra | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 07:16 pm  Yes |
Cammie | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 07:21 pm  Yes, I have no problem with that. Juju, so you wear a tutu. Hmmmm. Interesting. |
Guruchaz | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 07:25 pm  No |
Guruchaz | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 07:26 pm  Maybe |
Guruchaz | Wednesday, January 10, 2001 - 07:26 pm  Naaah. uh huh huh  |
Guruchaz | Thursday, January 11, 2001 - 07:57 am  Ok, let me think about it some more. |
Dilligaf | Friday, January 12, 2001 - 09:48 am  From a former game players point of view....10 people was enough to keep up with in the beginning. I think 14 players would get muddled. At least make it even-steven. 6 guys and 6 girls would work, but the game would last longer trying to banish that many unless you banish 4 each time. |
|