Archive through January 27, 2001
The ClubHouse: The Game II - Discussions: Game II Discussions:
How do you make your voting decisions?:
Archive January 20 - 27, 2001:
Archive through January 27, 2001
Bamagirl | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 11:59 am  I have two in mind...I am sure you know! |
Cammie | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 12:03 pm  Just hope the BGs know who to vote for! |
Bamagirl | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 12:05 pm  OH after last night...I am sure the names I want will be up! LOL (crossing fingers) |
Cammie | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 12:05 pm  Thanks for the get well wishes and welcome backs, by the way!! You guys are great! |
Moondance | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 12:07 pm  Cammie we are so happy you are with us! |
Dilligaf | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 12:07 pm  We better stock up on the Pampers! I've never seen so many whiney ass babies! |
Moondance | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 12:18 pm  Amen Pickle! |
Wink | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 12:21 pm  Hope you don't mind Dilli but you inspired me. |
Cammie | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 12:45 pm  Moon...((HUGS)) I might need some Pampers myself. I was laughing so hard I almost wet myself. Entertainment like this is hard to find! |
Willi | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 12:51 pm  LOL Dilli. I need the Pampers now too...LOL! |
Dilligaf | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 01:46 pm  "Pampers" For The Players...."Depends" For The Spectators..... I feel a banner coming on.... |
Luckygal | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 02:40 pm  Cammie, when I read those logs, I had TEARS. Poor Hostess1!! What a hilarious mess though!! |
Cammie | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 02:57 pm  Lucky, those chat logs are the best ever! Juju Rocks! |
Lancecrossfire | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 03:06 pm  Luckgal, I'm creating a message to cover ideas about last night. Long post, an will create a new thread as it spans so many ideas and so many people. One of the issues to cover is Hostess1 and her having to choose between stopping everything right off the bat and telling them how the debate would proceed, or letting them see what they came up with on their own. In my opinion, there are advantages to both and disadvantages to both. Much like when she had to decide about letting them vote over when Cammie was sick. She could have made them stick with their votes. I reserve my opinion for the post I'm creating, although would like to say that every choice the hostess makes changes the outcome of the game from that point on (heck, just look at how it would be different if she had made them stick with their votes). That is the nature of the job of hostess (right Lisa?) Much like the coach of a team who has a player run into a big snag in their game, I believe hostess may have asked herself, do I intervene, or do I let them see how they handle it. Just an opinion that was her approach. I've seen her post here before, so if she sees this and chooses to answer, cool. If she wants to keep that to herself for now, that is cool too. Or, I could be all wet, and she was hungry and went out for Chinese food. |
Norwican | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 03:20 pm  Look out Lance... you're teetering on the border of "Elitist's Land of Over-Analysis" j/k  |
Hostess1 | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 03:21 pm  Ding Ding Ding! Lance, wondering about Hostess during non-debate: "do I intervene, or do I let them see how they handle it" And, do we see sides of them that, until now, they've carefully hidden? |
Lancecrossfire | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 04:03 pm  Nor, yes, I do analyze, even if you are just kidding. And sometimes I over analyze...I rarely under-analyze though. It was a fair statement on your part. Hostess1--I thought I saw you say in the middle of the mayhem at one point something about wanting to see what they do. Wasn't sure though. Like I said, addressing it on the post I'm working on. I'll bid ado to this thread now and finish the other so everyone will have something to discuss/debate is they wish. Yes, it's a long post, so if you aren't into "reading to put you asleep", don't bother. haha Bot, if the above is looked at as Elitist worthy of analysis, you guys are really going to go off on me. |
Resortgirl | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 04:06 pm  I guess I would vote based on my gut instinct of who I don't really care for, who's annoying, or as I do in the Super Bowl, vote for the one with the cutest uniform. I have no idea who I would vote out at this point. When is voting again by the way? |
Luckygal | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 04:19 pm  I'm pretty simple. Last one who somehow pisses me off gets voted for! I like to think that I look much further than that, but I don't. |
Digilady | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 08:15 pm  Help make your voting decisions now.. The DEBATE is on in CHAT! |
Wink | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 09:03 pm  One of the BGs said last nite that she couldn't do the debate then because it was too late and she had to be up in six hours and then proceeded to stay for two more hours in the chat. When discussion arose about rescheduling the debate for tonite the same BG stated she would not be here. Surprise surprise. Those are the types of behaviours I take into consideration when it comes time to vote. |
Moondance | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 09:15 pm  Amen Wink! |
Tukuul | Friday, January 26, 2001 - 11:08 pm  Interesting segment: <Interrogator> To return to what you said about people being who they are...just acting a little better... <Azriel> nod <Interrogator> would you apply the reverse to? asometimes acting worse than what they are really like? <Azriel> yes <Azriel> we have a prime example <Azriel> Guru <Interrogator> heh <Azriel> he got in a role <Azriel> a character * Interrogator nods. <Azriel> now it's hard to find his way out <Interrogator> And people aren't always willing to let a person change after they have them pigeonholed? <Azriel> right <Azriel> not saying I think he is some lil angel you understand <Azriel> he has a temper <Interrogator> heh <Interrogator> And here I thought you meant he was a lil angel. ;) <Azriel> but I think he is a nice person |
Bamagirl | Saturday, January 27, 2001 - 07:06 am  I saw that too Wink!!! |
Tukuul | Saturday, January 27, 2001 - 10:59 am  This is one of the ways I make my decision. On what basis does Spam have to be slamming Merlin? I don't get it. Spam is off her rocker. Maybe nobody likes her because she IS being herself and nobody likes that either. lol! The only reason she likes Elitist is because he puts up with her shit. She likes everyone who will bow down to her and kiss her ass and tell her all the things she wants to hear. From this morning's RR: "If you were to suffocate one player (currently in the game)with a bag until they pass out, who would it be? Would you use paper or plastic? Spamgirl snaps: Plastic. Merlin." |
|