So Nor... Explain to us your distrust for Arreal and you support of Vykin?????
The ClubHouse: The Game - Discussion Room: General :
General - Archives:
So Nor... Explain to us your distrust for Arreal and you support of Vykin?????
Whit4you | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 05:23 pm  Ya know what can anyone here tell me why people insist on reading threads they are NOT interested in, about a topic they are not interested in, and in those threads saying "GET BACK TO THE GAME" or words to that effect? Why do YOU care if we choose to discuss whatever particular aspect in this game we are interested in? If your not interested in this topic, then why are you reading the threads ON This topic? Why not start your own about whatever aspect YOU are interested in and talk to those who join the thread? Thats what I have been doing. I don't pop into the "Sincronicity thread" telling them to forget about this topic and get back to "the game" If one more person says - "Vyking can't defend himself out here" I think I am gonna go nuts, lol. He's got more defenders out here then ANY of the others have that's for damn sure, and he's new to this board. And what is it you think he needs to defend himself for? he can't deny that he's done the things mentioned here since he's admitted it already - he just simply chooses to blame someone else rather then himself for the percieved problems it's caused, because he himself has done no wrong. The only problem I have is that a few people don't seem to think that ArReal has a right to post anything she wishes out here regarding this issue. We can but she can't? We can be cause it's speculation about people, but she can't because it's how she sees it from her personal experience - not just speculation? Gail was able to say whatever she wanted in her RR posts, and out here afterwords with no outrage because "she wasn't giving ArReal a chance to defend herself" Yet, when ArReal does the same thing it's "unfair", "vindictive", being bitter, or making much ado about nothing. I think they should let all the players out so they can join the real "Game", because the twists and turns, plots and paranoia, tangled webs of fained injustices out here are more interesting. That's the fun part of a "message board" your words here. Unless you are being painfully honest with everything you say, sooner or later the inconsistancies become apparent. What you really believe, and what you really stand for and so on, sooner or later become obvious. Such as those who pick posts like these to say "let's get on with the game" and not posts like Sincronicity. Or people who seem outraged that ArReal is telling her side in RR and outhere, who were not when Gail did so. Such as those who claim not to have an agenda in what they are saying here that "it's just a game, and this is totally insignifcant" - if that were the case then why waste time even posting that remark? LOL. Don't see folks doing that in the "snot" thread, can't tell me that's vital to "the game. Whit |
Whit4you | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 05:26 pm  Oh I'd definately root for Nor in a Game II, BG WARII would begin out here within minutes. Would make for a very interesting game to say the least. LOL Whit |
Digilady | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 05:30 pm  Well said, Whit! (of course, twould be best if YOU and NIKKED were in there with her) ROFLMAOBS!! CEO B/P |
Norequerdo | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 05:30 pm  well I have one question. What Website. And whit, I would love to see you defending me. Hell I would pay for the damn Burner. |
Whit4you | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 05:40 pm  I have no doubt you'd NEED defending in a Game II Nor, probably before the game EVEN began. LOL You certainly are not a stranger to controversy here, it seems to exude from any thread you've posted on. Whit |
Norequerdo | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 05:47 pm  you got that right whit. I sure would need a lot of defending. But any desire to speculate what would be a good challenge, want to pick the houseguests??? Man, you may not see any resignations, but assaults???? hmmm. How do you show cyber assaults. |
Digilady | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 05:48 pm  No, no, I'm payin for the damn burner! ROFLMAO Seeing you 3 at it... almost willing to up the ante. |
Nikkid | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 05:51 pm  Whit, wow. LOL nor - you need to be in the game first. heh, nothing's for free! |
Norequerdo | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 05:52 pm  ok how about a new folder, dream team house guests? |
Dpmd | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 06:11 pm  I hope someone tells Vykin how he is being accused outside the house of cheating. To be fair he should have the right to defend himself from the accusations. Both Mare and I think that the accusations should have been made in the game where he could defend himself if he wanted or waited until he was out. |
Whit4you | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 06:17 pm  Dp? He's not being accused of anything here. He's made it clear himself that he's cheating. So it's not an accusation it's a fact. I think he's getting plenty of inside info, now your suggesting he get even MORE? I must have missed your post when you were demanding to let ArReal know that people out here were accusing her of cheating. Care to direct me to it? Whitney |
Dpmd | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 06:27 pm  You won't find it because I don't post very much. There is always some @sshole (I guess I can direct that at you) who wants to make a fight ouyt of anything. Last I heard this was also the land of the free, so all i have to direct at you is whatever I want, like flagging you the bird. |
Katie | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 06:35 pm  Dp, Vykin posted himself that outside contacts told him that ArReal was cheating. If he has outside sources telling him anything about the game, he is cheating as much as he is accusing her of doing. |
Dpmd | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 06:41 pm  Thanks for the pleasant reply Katie. That is true about his outside contact. I guess I am just more comfortable seeing people going after someone who can fully defend themself. Which he can't really do until he is out of the huose. It is one of the reasons why we never spoke out about ArReal while she was in the house, or any of the others. |
Katie | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 06:50 pm  I guess I am thinking about fair too but I am thinking about it in another way. We all know that Vykin is having outside contact. He is getting outside information. The others inside probably aren't. I would be anything that certainly Roger isn't and I think the others are trying to honestly play fair and so they aren't either. Is it fair to the others that he has outside information and therefore help when the others aren't? Doesn't that give him an unfair advantage over the others? |
Norequerdo | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 06:56 pm  o.k. katie, let me explain it to you. Vykin doesnt have a chance. Stop focussing on Vykin. It will come down to Roger, luke Himay or Moon. There isnt a person here who things Vykin has a chance. So what advantage does Vykin have? Come on, lets look at the big picture. I am with Guru, I think roger will take it all |
Vasix | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 06:58 pm  I have it on good authority that Oh-Blessed-Being Heavenly-Sainted Roger is getting help from his former employees at the Vatican. In church today the priest announced Roger's Beatification. I'm thinking they will start naming schools after him in no time. And the Host is gonna get in trouble tooling around town in the Popemobile left at the website when the game started. He's causing all kinds of traffic jams and Roger didn't show him how to use the horn before he went in the game. |
Norequerdo | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 07:02 pm  well then there you go. Roger is getting help from the damn pope. Ok so who has the advantage now???? |
Whit4you | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 07:04 pm  Nor, no idea why you think Vykin doesn't stand a chance in this game. He's never even been Nominated here and seems to have more supporters then the rest of them combined here. Whit |
Norequerdo | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 07:08 pm  Whit I dont see it. I dont see Vykin having a chance. Maybe my perception is different than those in the house. But bottom line its the folks outside tha vote. The way I see it Vykin will be on nomination list, followed by Roger and Luke. |
Whit4you | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 07:14 pm  Nor, I'm ashamed of you - you are not thinking like Rich here at all! The one's left are wanting to win this game. Do you know why Rich didn't want Rudy beside him for the final vote? Because Rudy would have won. Take Roger for example, he's said nothing about Vyking cheating in this game, yet you know how he feels about cheating. Why if he wants to win would he put Vyking up for banishment, when he figures he will win out in the end if he's beside Vyking, because folks would rather vote for the one who didn't cheat. If I were going to nominate soemone for banishment right now and wanted to win this game, I wouldn't be voting for Vykin that's for sure. LOL |
Katie | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 07:14 pm  I don't think Vyk will be nominated. I honestly don't. |
Vasix | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 07:16 pm  But isn't Sister Whit of The TemperanceUnion been on the JOB? Hasn't Whit-0-Wots-O-Words been doing a daily Martin Luther on him and nailing up a list of sins and charges? Have you read any of Vykin's posts? He's adding some spice. And in honor of Xostile, I think we are going to have to refer to him as VYKIN of Giblets. The Giblets adds spice to the posts and the RR are nice touches. I think Xenia and Vykin have had the best RR posts. Everyone wants to get the Players out here and talk to them but the players talk o EVERYDAY in the Red Rooms. Next game Host tells the players that Red Room appearances are mandatory and a special prize will be awarded. |
Whit4you | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 07:30 pm  Vasix, I have no problem with Vykin, never had - I think he's done a damn good job in there of entertaining us. I disagree with some of his actions in there, and feel that in the end he'll probably disqualify himself because of the issue we have all been discussing. There are few people who would ethically accept a prize of this minimal amount unless they did so fair and square on equal footing with their friends. I think he conciders a few of the people in there as friends now, and I can not see him as the kind of person who'd do that to a friend. I am pretty good at reading people online and that's my take on him. Alot of people can be bought at some point, 10,000 - 100,000 - or whatever but few people would do ever take something from a friend unethically for a mere $200 bucks ya know what I mean? There are few people that cold, at least of those people I've known over the years. I get the impression he's a decent guy, or he wouldn't have as many friends here supporting him as he does. So I think you'll find in the end I am right about this. Whit |
Vasix | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 07:43 pm  Whit, your need to be found "right" is beyond my ability to fill. |
Kearie | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 08:13 pm  Ooooh! Ooooh! I got a question! Pick me. Pick me! Okay I have a few questions: When did I attack Vyk in the house? When did I blame Vyk for anything? Other than my final RR post, how have I attacked him? What reason does HE have to assume I'm blaming him for anything? Isn't he the one who has attacked me in posts and RR? Could his fears of me blaming him really be his guilty conscience---since I never blamed anyone for anything in that house???? |
Wcv63 | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 09:40 pm  Vykin is a true politico with all the tired political cliches that go along with the that. Why take the blame when someone else is handy? Running a "mud-slinging free" campaign in theory, but in actuality the mud is flying in all directions. I guess that's why he is the Prez. He has learned to question the definition of "is". |
Lafatme | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 09:43 pm  good one, wc! he reminds me of nixon. wouldn't surprise me to hear him say "i am not a crook" soon. |
Katie | Sunday, October 22, 2000 - 09:45 pm  Ha Ha lol lol!! Good one Laf |
|