Archive through May 10, 2002
MoveCloseDeleteAdmin

The ClubHouse: Archives: Plottin' and Plannin': Archive through May 10, 2002

Donut

Thursday, May 09, 2002 - 04:59 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
so then who the hell is visiting? and what tragedy happens? and if its a really bad tragedy and they are hyping it up like a snuff film then i am not watching anymore...( i boycotted for a few hours after the michael in the fire episode...)
and furthermore, i never got too far in my search for answers tonite because i DID get waylaid by the fruitbat melee! and i got distracted further from finishing it cuz i started to look up the turtle symbol to check out my theory of it being a somewhat underground gay symbol, gotten in a rally of unity by john, gabe and zoe (well john makes sense as he is 'out' of his (turtle) shell and the other two is just a little hunch on my part. but i am prematurely starting something up since i havnet even started reading the oh heck thread yet,,,now i am posting in the wrong place for this two...

Car54

Thursday, May 09, 2002 - 06:14 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Hell Donut, we don't care, we are concerned about shaving Fruitbats head!

You have GOT to check in more often...you are getting behind on things!!!

Grooch

Thursday, May 09, 2002 - 07:44 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Don't bats eat donuts?

Seamonkey

Thursday, May 09, 2002 - 09:15 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
b Yes, Grooch.. they lick off the frosting :)

Donut

Thursday, May 09, 2002 - 09:22 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
i beg your pardon!
fruitbat better stay on her side of the state....

Fruitbat

Thursday, May 09, 2002 - 09:35 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Bats are fond of chocolate donuts, if the truth be known. Plain or frosted with chocolate, never glazed. And they hate Krispy Kremes, too sweet.

Hippyt

Thursday, May 09, 2002 - 09:45 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Thank You Bat,Krispy Kremes just came here with big fanfare! I was so anticipating ,YUCK! They suck! Way too sweet!
A Donut discussion? LOL

Fruitbat

Thursday, May 09, 2002 - 10:23 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
What is the big deal with those things? Nifty 50's stuff on their website, maybe. They are doomed to crash......on the list of most over priced stock.

Car54

Thursday, May 09, 2002 - 11:36 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Now I KNOW you guys have no idea of what is good in life! I am from Nashville, home of the Krispy Kreme.... you are just misguided on this one girls.

Mamaanja

Friday, May 10, 2002 - 05:37 am EditMoveDeleteIP
Hey,hey,hey! Krispy Kreme's are the favorites of my family.

Webkitty

Friday, May 10, 2002 - 06:06 am EditMoveDeleteIP
Put me down in the gag category, too greasy and sweet. Sorry!

Micknrc

Friday, May 10, 2002 - 06:39 am EditMoveDeleteIP
Krispy Kremes--yuck

Cliotheleo

Friday, May 10, 2002 - 06:46 am EditMoveDeleteIP
Take it from a life long Krispy Kreme eater (I'm from Chattanooga Car54) you gotta get you some milk to cut the sweet on those KK's and I can never eat more than one at a time. But that 1!!!!! Oh my! I'll drive FAR out of my way to get a fresh one. And a KK's only good for about 8 hours after its made, after that there's no point in eating it.

The only thing I hate is that they seem to be doing their development in every part of the country BUT the south!

I've had two cats who liked donuts. Strange animals. I had heard cat's couldn't taste sweet.

Louloubell

Friday, May 10, 2002 - 06:59 am EditMoveDeleteIP
I've never had a Krispy Kreme donut just last Friday. I thought my freinds were nuts! We waited outside in line to get one. I was telling them we were NUTS and they just said that "I'd understand after I had one!" Well when we finally got into the store, they gave us one while we were waiting in line...it was still warm...I now understand!!! But, I can't see myself driving an hour and a half just to get one.

Car54

Friday, May 10, 2002 - 07:05 am EditMoveDeleteIP
Clio, see, us Tennessee girls know what is good!
Krispy Kreme for breakfast (warm IS important) and of course, Krystals for late night snacks!

Julieboo

Friday, May 10, 2002 - 10:13 am EditMoveDeleteIP
How did Kathy voting off Robert help her?

Seems to me to break up either S/V or N/P would have been a better idea. Any thoughts?

Seamonkey

Friday, May 10, 2002 - 10:22 am EditMoveDeleteIP
Julie, it seems like the five were able to agree on Robert. I think Kathy feared that if she pushed the idea of breaking one alliance or another she could become a target..

Robert WAS on the alliance that targetted most of them and most recently, last week, voted for Vee. And keeping him might pit one of them against him in F2 and his whole alliance is on the jury.

Even Robert voted Sean this time..

Grooch

Friday, May 10, 2002 - 10:23 am EditMoveDeleteIP
Because whoever she broke up, would be pissed at her and sitting on the jury.

Either way she is taking a chance. Vote off Rob and not make it to the final three.

Or vote off someone else, make it to the final two, and have the jury pissed at you.

Maybe she thought her odds were better the first way, or at least it was the most honest way.

Remember, they haven't been eating or sleeping well, so sometimes their decisions make no sense at all.

Mware

Friday, May 10, 2002 - 11:06 am EditMoveDeleteIP
OK, ponder this idea: Suppose next week that S/V and P/N recognize that Kathy represents the swing vote, and that she also has had good success in winning challenges. And suppose that they all realize that by winning the right challenge, she could control the outcome down to the final two. Wouldn't it make sense for both "cities" to agree to eliminate her next week, and just play it out that way? Kathy, along with being the most powerful next week, also appears to be the most vulnerable, unless she wins immunity.

Whoami

Friday, May 10, 2002 - 11:11 am EditMoveDeleteIP
You know, everyone seems to be speculating that Kathy now needs to decide whether to hook up with S/V or P/N. But what if those four now boot Kathy? It would make more sense that they get rid of her, then face each other. The next TC with them in the final four would likely result in a tie. Then we could finally see what the game rules are for a tie. Otherwise, why would the editors bring up the fact that previous votes are no longer a factor. So far, there have been no tie votes to address.

Julieboo

Friday, May 10, 2002 - 11:13 am EditMoveDeleteIP
Yup, I am with Mware. If I were S/V or P/N, I would vote Kathy off. That is why I thought it not smart for Kathy to lose Robert. You gotta at least get to the end to worry about the jury.
(another thought is that the 4 would vote K off cuz then they'd be less likely to get the remaining ones mad at them for voting their "partner" off before they voted Kathy off. Hope you can follow my thought here....)

Grooch

Friday, May 10, 2002 - 11:18 am EditMoveDeleteIP
But Neleh/Paschal are from her orignal tribe. And if they vote her off, it might piss off the jury of Rotus.

And I don't think Sean wants to go to the final two against Paschal or Neleh. His best chance to win would be against Kathy or Vee.

So maybe this is what Kathy is thinking.

Whoami

Friday, May 10, 2002 - 11:18 am EditMoveDeleteIP
You beat me to it Mware! I was typing and thinking as you were posting.....Now I look like an idiot.

Mware

Friday, May 10, 2002 - 11:29 am EditMoveDeleteIP
Whoami - you won't look like an idiot if we're right. And if not, you'll have company so it won't look as bad. Don't sweat it...great (???) minds think alike!

And thank you for taking the pressure off me for putting that theory out there!

Car54

Friday, May 10, 2002 - 01:13 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
I think Kathy was smart because if she bonded with Robert she would be with him to the end, and 3 of his alliance of 4 would be on the jury. The other jury members would be people who might feel she had betrayed them by joining up with Rob, so she might have used Rob to get a bit further and eliminate some annoying or threatening people, but if she alienated the jury or her partner was more popular with them, it would do her no good.

It would have helped her this week, (maybe) but hurt her in the long run. Good thinking,...they usually don't see these things.