Elitist | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 09:37 am  Well there seems to be some pairing off of some of the TVCH members and I thought it would be nice to have a place where couples can come and post. Of course my favorite pair is that unlikely cute and sweet couple Juju and Guru. Just look at their photos to see what I mean. |
Spamgirl | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 10:33 am  rofl... don't forget nos and merlin... and moon and OI... and laf and kearie... and the cb's all love each other... that's more of a pride than a pair... lance and maire in #truechat... |
Noslonna | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 11:18 am  Neil and Admin Lisa and Enb Guru and Nikkid Digi and Eli on the fringe Merlin and Petunia Nos and Lance Spam and Affinity Ocean and Moon Annagator and Adven Kearie and Laf Flint and Gail Elitist and women |
Spamgirl | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 11:28 am  Oh, I forgot anna and adven... i'll give you that one... and guru and nikkid... and OF COURSE Enb and Enbwife And I change my noslonna - It's Noslonna and SpamDad!  |
Lancecrossfire | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 01:04 pm  Nos---you wrote Nos and Lance. That was funny. Good to see your sarcasm level is still on the high side. Looks like there are now 3 differrent offerings for Nos and 2 for Spamgirl: Nos and Spamgirl |
Noslonna | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 01:08 pm  Lance darlin' ... I just wondered how long it would take you to respond. You love me too... admit it.  |
Spamgirl | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 01:10 pm  ROFL Nos and Spamgirl, that's a possibility Although not in a sexual way, of course We're the "love, not physical contact" view ROFL |
Lancecrossfire | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 01:18 pm  Nos, it would have been much sooner if things weren't so crazy at work. Maybe I will admit it someday if I ever get a straight answer to what your problem(s) is with me. Spam, I hope you are right. I'm not one of those guys that is into the girl/girl thing. |
Elitist | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 01:22 pm  Admit it Lance - all guys are into the girl/girl thing. But I think it would be more Spam/Sarabear. |
Spamgirl | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 01:31 pm  spam and sara, that would be passionate how about spam and elit ;) hehe |
Noslonna | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 01:34 pm  ok I admit it.. I (along with all other females) am in love with Elitist too. Nos and Ego  |
Elitist | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 01:38 pm  Yes I must admit it too. I am in love with Elitist/Ego. Elitist and Elitist  |
Spamgirl | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 01:42 pm  ROFL we can't have him, 'cuz he has himself! |
Noslonna | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 01:45 pm  I just love his size 13 feet. |
Mishamisha | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 01:48 pm  I'm shocked, Elitist. I thought we had something really special <sniff>. Especially when I finally figured out you weren't a girl. |
Spamgirl | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 01:50 pm  Don't worry, Misha... you've always got me ;) (just to irk Lance ROFL!) |
Noslonna | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 01:51 pm  Misha it was his panties that threw us off for awhile. (btw they are size 13 too) |
Mishamisha | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 01:51 pm  Spamisha |
Mishamisha | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 01:54 pm  Oh! I wondered what happened to that pair! Sneaky, Elit, very sneaky. |
Spamgirl | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 01:56 pm  ROFL what was I... mishamgirl! |
Mishamisha | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 02:02 pm  Now I'm just waiting for Elitist to come back and explain himself. |
Elitist | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 02:06 pm  Hey who is better to love than oneself? I am sure Moon will agree Mishamisha you have a special place in my heart - who else has multiple....names whenever I am around? |
Elitist | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 02:07 pm  Yes Nos I have size 13 everything. |
Noslonna | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 02:08 pm  Braggart |
Spamgirl | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 02:19 pm  ELIT! i'm without words elit... you never cease to amaze me |
Optics | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 02:48 pm  Elitist can I be woman #1? Since my gender detector has shown positive for woman status? |
Elitist | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 02:50 pm  It is hard to play favorites Optics. But I will let you be my #1 man/woman. How is that? |
Moondance | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 02:57 pm  >Hey who is better to love than oneself? I am sure Moon will agree< Not sure what you meant but I took it being mean, Elit |
Ocean_Islands | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 03:01 pm  I think it's time for Elitist to give a speech about what his nickname means. |
Elitist | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 03:07 pm  No Moon, sorry - it was a take on the precept that you must love yourself before you can love others, in an effort to explain my narcissm. A spiritual matter, and since I consider you to be one of our spiritual leaders here, I had to link you so that it would have more validity. Now can we be a couple again? |
Moondance | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 03:08 pm  If you want to speak up about self love, Elitist, speak for yourself |
Moondance | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 03:10 pm  That is a good save but please remember in the context in which you used it (with a smirk smile) it was not in a spiritual way. |
Moondance | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 03:12 pm  You are much too busy with all these other women... I will save myself for only one heart |
Elitist | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 03:17 pm  elitist n : someone who believes in rule by an elite group Usually people associate an elitist with being snobbish and feeling himself to be better than others. I picked the name up during BB from a post here on the board, something about "elitist attitudes". I chose the name because even if I was rude, overbearing, or just unbearable, I could always say "What do you expect - look at my nickname". Nos has dubbed me with a second nickname - Ego - from the Flame Warriors site. And she likes to keep calling me that |
Elitist | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 03:18 pm  Hey the smirk is my trademark! And I was speaking for myself when I was speaking of self love |
Noslonna | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 03:22 pm  Ego.. you like the name too. We do keep you on your size 13 toes. |
Spamgirl | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 03:27 pm  Moon: That is a good save but please remember in the context in which you used it (with a smirk smile) it was not in a spiritual way That wasn't a smirk, that was a wink... and I totally read it as being a spiritual thing Gosh, I've said it before and I'll say it again - y'all take things too damn personally... don't be so sensitive! This is a freakin' message board... |
Noslonna | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 03:29 pm  I thought it was very spiritual |
Moondance | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 03:30 pm  That is a smirk SpamSpam... look it up in the clipart |
Spamgirl | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 03:30 pm  but the dood is winking... that's a bad smirk... i think that little sly grin is more of a smirk i guess we blame the clipart gods for this one |
Noslonna | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 03:33 pm  It was a spiritual smirk. |
Moondance | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 03:44 pm  If a wink was meant then a wink would have been typed instead a smirk was typed... and a smirk is not spiritual. Spam, you have had your feelings hurt ... you have gotten passionate and mad and have used this message board to vent so please allow me the same. I did not appreciate the insinuation from Elitist's post and felt the need to say something. I have been an avid, positive poster and feel I have the right to stand up for myself. I do not feel a person has a right to hurt someone's feelings and blame it on his nick name. |
Soeur | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 04:41 pm  Stepping in to the fray of this lovefest/confab...the references to clipart yanked me in hard... I have spent some time with the clipart (that may even by why I stayed and endured my confusion when I first joined this site!). ...those names do not accurately describe the clippies' expressions! (this looks like a smirk)>> (I see a grin)>> (looks much more like a chortle to me)>> (separated at birth??)>>  (confused?) (who IS this guy???) (nyah, nyah, you got underwear for Christmas and I got games!) from the top they are really called wink, smirk, smile, proud/teeth, crazy, buck (??) and blah ! |
Juju2bigdog | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 05:35 pm  I feel strongly both ways. You too, Gu? Ju  |
Juju2bigdog | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 05:37 pm  Uh oh, formatting not working. |
Ocean_Islands | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 08:20 pm  Speaking of TVCH couples, when I met Moondance in Los Angeles recently, we had a bystander record the moment with a photo. If you'd like to see it just click on my name! |
Elitist | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 08:20 pm  Wait - I know it is a smirk and I use it as my trademark and smile. I hate the clipart smile, and the happy everyone uses. So I use the smirk as my happy face and signature. And I have said that before this thread and also in this one. Check out my previous posts - almost always when I use a clipart it is the smirk. What better clipart for Elitist? So don't get offended by my smirk. |
Ocean_Islands | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 08:35 pm  \jpeg_alreadyuploaded{9240,Neonthomas1.jpg} |
Moondance | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 08:39 pm  It's one of my favorite pix, Mr. O |
Moondance | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 08:48 pm  Elitist, I was offened mostly by your comment and insinuation and have been quite clear on the rest. No one has rights to the clipart. I take a smirk for a smirk, a wink for a wink, etc... |
Elitist | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 09:04 pm  OK I apologized, it wasn't meant that way, I have explained myself to others on the board, and I have made it clear that the smirk is my smile for future reference. Is my apology acknowledged? And I like the pic Ocean - but those people look familiar. |
Soeur | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 09:10 pm  Moon, I apologize as well. I hope my superficial post about clipart did not offend. Really, when I look at the images they register differently than their descriptions do. |
Moondance | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 09:17 pm  Apology accepted ... all that was needed was a simple apology ... that's all ... not followed by all the other 'stuff' because it tends to take away from it. |
Moondance | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 09:17 pm  Soeur... no apology needed but thank you |
Moondance | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 09:19 pm  pretty ironic ... the smiley didn't go thru on the post |
Elitist | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 09:21 pm  Yeah but the formatting is screwed up for some reason. I can't even make new paragraphs - it runs everything together. |
Moondance | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 09:24 pm  Must be Karma... |
Soeur | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 09:24 pm  Hey Elit, your smirking days are over! (LOL) only kidding!!! |
Lalavoom | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 09:33 pm  This is very interesting. Moon is offended by what Elitist intended as a compliment or at the very least, innocuous teasing. Why so defensive? What is it that you think he is insinuating? This isn't an attack. I am just curious. |
Moondance | Thursday, January 04, 2001 - 09:36 pm  It was between Elitist & I... it is over so I don't feel it necessary or fair to rehash it. People have different perceptions and are hurt on different levels ... sometimes it is best left alone. But thank you for your concern. |
Spamgirl | Friday, January 05, 2001 - 04:52 am  blah nevermind |
Juju2bigdog | Friday, January 05, 2001 - 06:10 am  I apologize too. |
Elitist | Friday, January 05, 2001 - 06:36 am  Moon I thought about this, and I think more than an apology WAS needed. I made an innocent, in my mind, comment. You took it the wrong way, and I apologized and clarified the comment, in what I thought, as originally, a very complimentary way. It was not a "save" as you stated. If I had only given you an "I'm sorry" that would mean that the original comment was a derogatory comment and have admitted guilt. It was not meant that way, and I have no guilt. So now I am owed an apology on my apology and I am going away in a huff till I see one (and that is a smirk again lol) |
Mishamisha | Friday, January 05, 2001 - 06:42 am  Oh, I get it! Moon & Elit are one of these "couples". They're just the kind that show their love through petty bickering. Kinda annoying, but gave me something to read this morning. Love to both of you. |
Mishamisha | Friday, January 05, 2001 - 06:50 am  Wish I could insert a song here. I'd choose "Wonderful" by Adam Ant. |
Bearcatuc | Friday, January 05, 2001 - 07:14 am  Sorry about this post, but I need to vent. This thread is why I have stayed a lurker most of the time since August. It started out as a fun read, then certain people take one post the wrong way and feelings get hurt. Apologies are demanded and those are taken the wrong way. Why do certain people on this site expect others to bow down to them? Please, if you plan on being involved in a message board, get some thick-skin. Elitist, I will apologize to you for the abuse you have taken in this thread. |
Ocean_Islands | Friday, January 05, 2001 - 07:22 am  Regardless of whether you like it or not, there's little harm in asking for clarification of comments. In fact, that's what communication is all about. Communication of feelings could hardly be labeled abuse in anyone's mind. |
Norwican | Friday, January 05, 2001 - 07:26 am  The smirk is Elitist's trademark... just as Guru has the goofy glasses guy... and Moon uses the angel. I am surprised that his statement was taken the way it was... he has never appeared to me to be mean spirited at all. |
Fruitbat | Friday, January 05, 2001 - 08:00 am  I agree with Ocean and I would like to add, Bear.....feel free to skip a thread that doesn't work for you. One board cannot please everyone all the time. The written word, with it's absence of expression and tone can be misunderstood..thus the clairification going on here. |
Juju2bigdog | Friday, January 05, 2001 - 09:16 am  I apologize again.
 |
Spamgirl | Friday, January 05, 2001 - 10:06 am  There's a BIG difference between asking for clarification, and begging for appologies. See, it's all about assumption and intention... one writes with a certain intent, and the reader assumes at what that intent is... if the two do not concour on what the intent is, then it is right to clarify - it is required! BUT the proper thing, when such an event arises, is to hold back on your emotional response until all questions are answered, and the intent is brought forth (unless the intent is obvious - if I tell you to Off, obviously I'm not complimenting you). Moon didn't do that, she let her feelings get hurt (no less, not by a person who means a lot to her, but by a person on a message board who she will likely never meet, and who could be lying about himself anyways and therefore not be what she believes him to be) and, in turn, replied with hurtful and bitter comments like: - "That is a good save but please remember in the context in which you used it (with a smirk smile) it was not in a spiritual way." (which is not only mean spirited, which she felt Elitist's comment was, but also assuming and closed-minded!) - "I do not feel a person has a right to hurt someone's feelings and blame it on his nick name." (he didn't! As he said, he was referring to Moon's more spiritual side, not her selfish personality) I think appologies only mean anything when given freely, anyways... especially on here! |
Ocean_Islands | Friday, January 05, 2001 - 10:22 am  I think "holding back [an] emotional response until all questions are answered" is good advice for everyone who has posted on this thread. It is good advice, as well, for all TVClubhouse members. |
Moondance | Friday, January 05, 2001 - 10:27 am  I am a bit confused... I was the one that needed clarification and got my feelings hurt ... yet there are some on this board who cannot let this go and continue to hurt more. It was between two people not 20. This does not mean that you do not have the right to your opinion but to make judgment on my character Spam, is not necessary. I would hope if anyone else was ever hurt and needed clarification, they would ask. Covered up feelings and hurt come out in eventually in very unhealthy ways. No matter the intentions of a person ... it does not mean the other cannot get hurt ... it is not making anyone right or wrong it is just discussing feelings. Isn't that what communication is for? |
Spamgirl | Friday, January 05, 2001 - 10:41 am  I never judged your character |
Elitist | Friday, January 05, 2001 - 11:55 am  I like it - Moon and I a couple, kinda like the "War of the Roses" with Michael Douglas, Kathleen Turner, and Danny Devito. We could escalate our small disagreement till it destroys the whole board, maybe the whole world, and even ourselves, and still be unrepentant! Wow! Is that an Ego or what? I hope we are through with this Moon (and everyone else), even though it was fun. I just got back from my 4 year old's well check and he got 4 shots - three in the backside and one in the arm. I am the one that has to hold him while he gets them - mom is too squeamish. It is kind of hard watching him have to lay there and let someone hurt him and see him cry. So this seems a little trivial right now and I think we should get back to the business at hand - TVCH Couples. |