Why sequestration?
MoveCloseDeleteAdmin

TV ClubHouse: Archive: Why sequestration?

Outlawout

Thursday, September 25, 2003 - 09:46 am EditMoveDeleteIP
It wouldn't be the first time I missed the obvious, but why did they bother to sequester the jury if they then turned around and allowed them to watch the entire season tapes anyway? I thought, according to an interview with Shapiro, that the whole point of the sequester house was so that the jury wouldn't be tainted by the diary room talk like last year, when they all saw Danielle's DR antics. I don't see any other point, other than it allowed them to get a few minutes of boring footage of former HG's throwing water balloons. By changing their mind they created what little drama there was last night, and possibly swayed the jury toward Jun.

Pantageas

Thursday, September 25, 2003 - 09:47 am EditMoveDeleteIP
Personally, I think they made them vote THEN let them watch the tapes.

Crazydog

Thursday, September 25, 2003 - 09:49 am EditMoveDeleteIP
Yes, they voted first. The jurors got together to discuss Jun and Alison. Then they are shown voting with the keys. Then they watch the tapes. Then they get back together to "settle scores".

Outlawout

Thursday, September 25, 2003 - 09:57 am EditMoveDeleteIP
Oh right...Thanks!

Spunky

Thursday, September 25, 2003 - 10:02 am EditMoveDeleteIP
I just said that under Unanswered Questions, that I cannot believe the votes were not changed after they've seen the DR entries.
It cannot be proved unless the hgs reveal that themselves, but they're bound to secrecy at least for two years.

Chippy

Thursday, September 25, 2003 - 10:50 am EditMoveDeleteIP
You really don't think the hg would have noticed if their original votes were changed?

It cost BB a pretty penny to sequester these hg at a villa in Mexico. Just doesn't make sense at all if they were gonna change the vote.