Archive through September 20, 2003
TV ClubHouse: Archive: The premiere of SURVIVOR :
Archive through September 20, 2003
Eeyoreslament | Friday, September 19, 2003 - 11:26 am     That's cool SFJF, I meant no ill message. I am NEVER crusty in my posts. All are written while smiling. I definitely see your point about spoilers, and had never thought about that. I am a sucker for spoilers. I'm a westie, and I LOOK-UP what happened on the show even before I watch it. hahahahaha. :-) See you all in the Survivor boards!! |
Way2prissy | Friday, September 19, 2003 - 11:28 am     Hmmmm....Ali on Survivor? No mirrors, no hairbrush, no blow dryer...NOT A CHANCE! For the record, I wouldn't have lasted through the first boat ride on Survivor. If I was forced to jump ship "as is" and didn't have a bra on, I would be, "That's it! I'm OUT!" (Picture Kramer on that "Master of Your Domain" episode) <Removed Spoiler Mod> |
Way2prissy | Friday, September 19, 2003 - 11:36 am     Ooops...sorry Sanfranjoshfan. I think I broke the rules...not my intention! SOME people just shouldn't be allowed to post on these boards! LOL |
Cliotheleo | Friday, September 19, 2003 - 11:42 am     "I thought the guy who encouraged flashing was just being a realist." Thanks Eeyore, I tired to post something like that several times, but I couldn't do it without coming off like a skank. Anyone who wants to scoff at such a notion has obviously never experienced the benefits of it. SanFran, sounds like a deal to me! ............ Does anyone know of a good non-spoiler Survivor board? Or has there ever been talk of making a non-spoiler section of the one here? That's the main thing that keeps me away. |
Busydizzle | Friday, September 19, 2003 - 12:09 pm     Just in case you missed the Survivor premiere (like I did), it will be rebroadcast this Sunday, 9:30PM ET/PT (according to cbs.com). |
Busydizzle | Friday, September 19, 2003 - 12:13 pm     If it's proper for women to go around flashing their breasts (for lewd reasons rather than simply to be comfortable), does that make it acceptable for men to expose their penises in such a fashion? |
Chiparock | Friday, September 19, 2003 - 12:25 pm     Generally, women flash their breasts to titillate others, whereas men flash their penis for self-gratification. Whether or not either is proper depends upon the beholder, IMHO. Police usually arrest male flashers for indecent exposure, but I doubt that there would be any complaints about a female flasher. |
Gidget | Friday, September 19, 2003 - 12:27 pm     Okay let me qualify my opinion before giving it. If men can go shirtless, I think women should be allowed to also. I have done it back in the day. It feels great. I can see why men do it. SO can someone please explain to me why some people are defending the notion of the Survivor women flashing their breasts to get supplies BUT some people are dissing Ali for using her sexuality to win BB. Until this moment, I too had taken the position against that aspect of Ali. But when the guy told the girls to bare it for supplies, I didn't see the harm in that. So I am now revising my opinion of that portion of Ali's game. |
Woodpecke® | Friday, September 19, 2003 - 12:28 pm     I flash mine because I enjoy the whooshing sound it makes when I move it back and forth through the air. |
Gidget | Friday, September 19, 2003 - 12:29 pm     We are talking about above the waist Woodpecker. |
Sanfranjoshfan | Friday, September 19, 2003 - 12:31 pm     Busydizzle Men generally tend to respond positively to boob exposure in a public place. Women generally tend to respond negatively to penis exposure in a public place. |
Cliotheleo | Friday, September 19, 2003 - 12:31 pm     Yes Busy! Seriously, what I am talking about is not a fully naked exposure like on Girls Gone Wild, more of a bend over in a low cut shirt ............ SEE! I sound like a skank! Darn it! I'm not a skank ................ well, not much of one. Gidget, I dunno. I don't have a problem with Ali doing what she did. I've had only the slightest bid of sadness over the matter after watching the old shows and seeing how Nate seemed to have really fallen for her. But other than that, I say more power to her. |
Woodpecke® | Friday, September 19, 2003 - 12:31 pm     I was answering Chiparock. |
Crossfire | Friday, September 19, 2003 - 12:32 pm     In Ontario, Women are allowed to go topless. Unfortunately, very few take advantage. |
Gidget | Friday, September 19, 2003 - 12:33 pm     Sorry, my mistake. As long as we are the subject, I am sick of movies that show full female frontal nudity. I don't want to see the girls!!! And don't tell me to watch porn. I want equality in movies. By the way, don't mind me, I'm on medication. |
Cliotheleo | Friday, September 19, 2003 - 01:06 pm     Gidget, I dunno, I'm into boys as much as the next girl but sometimes male nudity creeps me out. Have you seen Josh from BB3's pics from Playgirl? Eeek! |
Gidget | Friday, September 19, 2003 - 04:25 pm     I have not seen Josh in Playgirl. I have been fortunate until recently to see everything I wanted to really see right in my own home. lOL Clearly some men are more attractive nude than others. Just as the same would be true of women. The reason it bothers me in movies is partly because of the double standard against female actesses and because if the movie has taken me to a sexual encounter, well it is hard to explain. For me to identify with such an encounter, my personal experience would involve seeing the man. I think the reason we don't is because men have much bigger hang ups about their equipment. Women can easily, and do, have surgery to give themselves beautiful breasts. Fortunately for women, their primary sex organ is not readily visible and seeing it is not as big a factor as seeing their breasts. I don't think any such thing exists for a man. Except for a fluffer. I find a physically fit man naked a truly wonderful sight. I don't think I am alone in this taste or else there wouldn't be all those statues in museums. But I digress. LOL |
Chiparock | Saturday, September 20, 2003 - 09:27 am     See, Wood? Now don't you find that gratifying? |
Ric_Munoz | Saturday, September 20, 2003 - 10:10 am     Does anyone else think that Ryan (the produce clerk who hung out with scout leader Lillian) looks like an elongated version of Shia LaBoeuf, (Project Greenlight/Battle of Shaker Heights)? |
Eliz87 | Saturday, September 20, 2003 - 10:13 am     Umm...Gidget...For those of us who are less informed...What's a fluffer? :p |
Monalisahi | Saturday, September 20, 2003 - 10:14 am     elongated???? Was he one of the naked guys? |
Eliz87 | Saturday, September 20, 2003 - 10:19 am     MONA....hahhahahahaha |
Ric_Munoz | Saturday, September 20, 2003 - 10:21 am     Eliz87: if Gidget provides an explanation for fluffer, it will almost certainly be moderated as it requires explicit sexual detail. In the thread devoted to Nathan's future celebrity potential, my speculation was removed entirely and all I suggested was that he would do well in adult films directed towards the non-heterosexual community. No, Ryan was not one of the naked guys. |
Stardust | Saturday, September 20, 2003 - 10:37 am     Just had to say GO RUPERT!!! He is from Indianapolis, where I live!! Yay! And by the way, woodpecker, I am originally from mooresville, in. just like yourself! Also wanted to add that the "guy who keeps losing his shorts" his name is Osten...and that guy is already on my nerves!! LOL |
Pamy | Saturday, September 20, 2003 - 10:45 am     Fluffer..keeps the guys fluffy between scenes |
|