Vgood2 | Friday, September 05, 2003 - 03:09 pm     So I was sitting here thinking the POV had no set up today so far, so it's either hidden in the house and they have to find it (would explain short lockdown) or maybe it's an offer, and since there has been talk of two more episodes ordered, makes one wonder if the offer will be to bring back an evicted houseguest in exchange for the veto, and whomever it is would be a nemesis, like Dana to Ali for example......just a thought |
Bastable | Friday, September 05, 2003 - 03:44 pm     The producers have gone on record several times now to say that no evicted HGs will be re-entering the game. So we can discount that once and for all. |
Meggieprice | Friday, September 05, 2003 - 03:50 pm     Well the producers also said they would not have a "platinum" veto which allowed the veto holder to nominate as it would lessen the power of HOH- and having a pov today does indeed way lessen that power...so you can't always believe what they say! |
Wendo | Friday, September 05, 2003 - 03:53 pm     However, Meggie, Rob still got to nominate two people he wanted out of the house. If Ali gets POV, Jun is still on the block and one of the HG's he wanted out. I wonder how different people would feel if it were Erika on the block. Would having the veto still be so awful since she's more favored here? Just wondering. |
Puzzled | Friday, September 05, 2003 - 04:08 pm     I'm confused. Except for last week when the schedule was all messed up because of the MTV awards, weren't the POV comps held on Sunday? |
Clubcarl | Friday, September 05, 2003 - 04:18 pm     After reading the live feeds about America's Choice I thought, wouldn't it be funny if whoever wins AC also wins POV. |
Caycaye | Friday, September 05, 2003 - 04:29 pm     Someone mentioned in an earlier chat that perhaps the veto winner would have only the "normal" veto power like last year. No Golden Power of Veto...i.e. that whomever wins the veto can only "save" someone else. But what would be the use of that? Why are they having a veto at this point anyway? Last year when it was down to four, Jason voted out Marcellus when he was up against Amy. |
R151996 | Friday, September 05, 2003 - 04:35 pm     Last week's POV comp started late Wednesday evening after Jun left the house and ended Thursday afternoon. Not having a veto at this point gives total eviction power to the one non-nominated player. A veto comp at least allows the players a chance to determine who isn't nominated. |
Crossfire | Friday, September 05, 2003 - 04:36 pm     Minor nitpick, that happened at five. |
Meggieprice | Friday, September 05, 2003 - 04:37 pm     Wendo- I would not feel any differently.I feel at this point in the game the chips fall where they do and I have always loved that the HOH and one person get to decide this week. I fully expected Erika would be nominated and still felt that way. My biggest hope was that the three women would end up together and I looked forward to seeing the best one win without caring which of the three- and that includes Ali, Wendo! lol! I admire her game even thoug I do not like her at all. Actually, I wasn't talking about it being fair or unfair- I was addressing the fact that Bastable said the producers said no one would re-enter the house but they also stated something that would have meant there would not be a veto now and look what happened. They can do anything they want. |
Wendo | Friday, September 05, 2003 - 04:37 pm     Caycaye, No, Marcellus was voted out when there were five left. Amy was voted out when there were four left. Dani was HOH. She put up Lisa and Amy. Jason voted out Amy. |
Caycaye | Friday, September 05, 2003 - 04:42 pm     Oh really Wendo?? Then I beg many pardons...I really thought that Marcellus and Amy were put up by Danielle and Jason voted Marcy out when he failed to veto himself off...but I FORGOT about Lisa!!! OMG!!! She only WON The whole thing!!! LOL Sorry again. |
Caycaye | Friday, September 05, 2003 - 04:42 pm     Well...when there were four left last year...DID they have a Veto?? |
Wendo | Friday, September 05, 2003 - 04:44 pm     No, last year there was no veto at four. And no problem, I mix things up all the time. LOL! |