Laisey | Sunday, August 03, 2003 - 09:51 pm     Lurk, wear a heavy shoe. I doubt we'll get to see it live strictly because of the time frame. I'm hoping that they'll show us the house during the time slot they've been using for the BB3 folks and use that time each week for clips from the second house. I can't quite see them taking the time for her to get to the car, the short drive, and her reaction to the house and then have the HOH comp. I expect we'll see a well put together clip next Thursday. |
Lurknomore | Sunday, August 03, 2003 - 10:19 pm     FINE throw ice water at me Laisey it's OK...NOT!!!!! lol Can we at least see them tell her that the new house is on the lot?!?! Then we can see her face, while the audio guy is there chewing valium with his finger on the BLEEP button! That should be amusing enough for the time being. |
Seanflynn2003 | Sunday, August 03, 2003 - 10:34 pm     The HGs were speculating today that the house could be on the lot, so we might see disappointment, but not shock |
Trubycat | Sunday, August 03, 2003 - 10:55 pm     Yeah, I wondered where they even got the idea they'd be sequestered on a beach somewhere. It was different in BB3 because it was 4 people they needed to sequestered ALONE APART so the wouldn't talk with each other too much before one went back into the house. I actually think it was Dana who started it all - she kept saying she just wanted to make the jury so she could spend the summer getting her stipend while on a beach. |
Xarph | Sunday, August 03, 2003 - 11:07 pm     Truby, the sequester house is on a beach. See the picture at the bottom of the August 02 archieve of this thread. ../10972/1095124.html?1059847814 |
Trubycat | Sunday, August 03, 2003 - 11:08 pm     LMAO, Xarph. I wish it were true! |
Lostintheglades | Monday, August 04, 2003 - 08:33 am     I'm dying here Xarph!!! Tooo funny! |
Laisey | Monday, August 04, 2003 - 08:45 am     Lurk, that wouldn't fit in with the soap opera theme. Would you deprive Arnie of the opportunity to do the "Tune in next week to see Dana's reaction to her new home" bit? Opps, cancel that question -- of course you would. lol |
Sasman | Monday, August 04, 2003 - 09:53 am     Looks like where the Beverly Hillbillies came from. I still haven't stopped laughting! |
Gina8642 | Monday, August 04, 2003 - 10:22 am     I think sequestering only seven gives the show some lee way in case someone walks or is ejected, a la Scotty. If Dana or someone else doesn't want to be sequestered, they can ask one of the non-sequestered back. I'm sure David would be happy to do it. This helps out with the potential of a tied jury. |
Smokeit | Monday, August 04, 2003 - 10:26 am     omg That picture cracked me up. |
Spunky | Monday, August 04, 2003 - 10:38 am     Will the two PLASMA SCREENS be connected?? They could see each other from their respective houses and the sequestered hgs will keep bugging those left in the BB house...eh, eh.. |
Lurknomore | Monday, August 04, 2003 - 12:36 pm     LOLOL Laisey you sure got that one right about me/Arnie. And with the greatest of pleasure too Spunky you just scared me...if I still have to listen to Dana's voice I may shoot myself. Canceling feeds might be a more practical solution. And btw I loved that house shot too! |
Bohawkins | Tuesday, August 05, 2003 - 08:17 am     I just can't imagine having only one person in the sequestration house. My theory was that they will have Amanda, Michelle and David join Dana there. Maybe they will allow them to do chat room guest appearances. Michelle has already done one (on Jokers site) and I noticed that she said that she had watched the tv show, but not the live feeds. Since we have heard that they are limited in where they can go for public appearances, I wonder if that was controlled by the producers? |
Bastable | Tuesday, August 05, 2003 - 08:23 am     I don't see how they can allow Amanda, Michelle,or David into the house--they have all seen the DR segments that have aired. It would spoil the purpose of sequestration. More likely, they will allow Dana to have books and movies during her first week. |
Jpgramma | Tuesday, August 05, 2003 - 08:27 am     Perhaps they'll be books and movie videos available in the house. Perhaps they'll even allow the HGs to request what books and videos they'd like, even to include videos of favorite soaps or TV programs or news they've been missing. If so, after having been in the BB house for so long, a week reading and watching videos wouldn't be all that bad. In fact, I'd think it would be very welcomed. In addition, they may have the BB shrink at the ready for incoming jury members. I rather doubt they'll have any of the already evicted guests there. The whole point of sequestering them is to keep them from learning about the BB buzz from DR talks, livefeeds etc. Any of the already evicyed guests would have that info and BB wouldn't risk their sharing any of it with the sequesterees (is that a word?) lol edited to add that your post was added while I was still (slowly) typing this Bastable. You said the same thing I did, but much more concisely. lol Brevity IS the soul of wit, but I fear I may be working with only ½ of my wit. ;) |
Laisey | Tuesday, August 05, 2003 - 08:28 am     I read somewhere on this board that the evictees would have contact with CBS people. I don't know if that's fact or fiction, but there would be no reason that BB couldn't provide a companion of some type for some or all of the first week. We could even have competitions for BB staff members and the loser gets to spend a day with Dana. |
Cliotheleo | Tuesday, August 05, 2003 - 08:32 am     I'm not clear as to what the sequestrees (is that a word?) are supposed to be basing their final vote on? I've heard them mention that all they'll get to see is footage of the various competitions. How is performance in a food comp. supposed to be something that they should base their votes on? I keep trying to compare it to Survivor. I know they bring in the jury for the last few eviction (that's not the right word for Survivor, but I can't think of it at the moment) ceremonies, but is that all they base their votes off of? The whole thing just seems weird to me. I think they should have access to the live feeds. |
Cliotheleo | Tuesday, August 05, 2003 - 08:34 am     Actually ......... it would be ideal for the sequestration house to have flatscreens all over it pumping in the live feeds so the evicted HGs would HAVE to watch those still in the game and see what they're doing. |
Maris | Tuesday, August 05, 2003 - 08:40 am     I think they should have access to the live feeds to. The diary rooms are irrelevant. Yesterday I heard enough from the HGs to know now for sure that the Diary rooms are totally managed by BB. Alison said that they told her what to say. Dana and Jun said the diary room was manipulating them by making suggestions about what other people were saying. Live feeds are the only way they can see the truth of what is going on. |
Cliotheleo | Tuesday, August 05, 2003 - 08:42 am     LOL! Well, IF I thought the jury was going to see the diary room sessions (which we know they won't) and IF I were one of the HGs I'd be telling everyone that the producers were controlling what I said too! "Dana, you won't believe those awful producers, they're MAKING me say that I hate you in the DR!" |
Laisey | Tuesday, August 05, 2003 - 08:48 am     The only thing CBS/ASP has said officially is that they will not see DRs. They have never said exactly what they will be allowed to see. For some reason I had the impression they will see the TV shows minus the DRs. I wish someone from the press had asked about the live feeds, AS's answer might have been interesting. |
Maris | Tuesday, August 05, 2003 - 08:48 am     Lol Clio except that you have three different HGs saying it. Then remember last year the Chiara/Amy blow up? Everyone knew the diary room set that up. I am just saying the diary rooms dont have the same meaning as they had back in BB2. I think the evicted should see the feeds because it will really open up their eyes. Imagine Dana watching the feeds and seeing what Robert and Jun really had to say about her? They could kiss her vote goodbye, I bet she would even vote for Ali for the win over them. At the same time, it lets the sequestered see like we see, who is really playing the game. Who is pulling the strings. That is who should win this thing, not the people sitting on their duffs or the people following the leader. |
Cliotheleo | Tuesday, August 05, 2003 - 09:18 am     Does the idea of the jury ONLY seeing the show, in other words, the producers' version of what's happening scare anyone else besides me? I mean that's WAY worse than the whole alleged Roddy tampering last year. |
Zachsmom | Tuesday, August 05, 2003 - 09:19 am     no comment...just wanted to 100  |