Archive through August 27, 2003
MoveCloseDeleteAdmin

TV ClubHouse: ARCHIVES: Big Brother USA 2003 General Discussions Part 1: Someone else leaving?: Archive through August 27, 2003

Darlingal

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:13 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
They are extending by two episodes to help promote the new season. Perhaps the "removal" is to allow one houseguest to attend a taping of a new show. They can cross promote that way.

C1mag

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:13 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
It's irritating isn't it? I'm still thinking too hard about it. He got us die hards good on this little twist didn't he? So many choices. To leave means a person can come back. To be removed suggests that a person is taken out and won't return. The idea that the sequestered house would now have any say so in who stays and who goes doesn't work for me at this point. When you are evicted you are through with the game inside the house. Arnold says he doesn't even like to give penalty nominations because it would mess with how that particular group that still remains is playing the game. I'm leaning towards this being something soooooo overtly stupid that we are all gonna say.. "how LAME" and it will have something to do with all the things that they have "removed" these past couple of days. If they allow the sequestered to come back then he lied cause he said no one would be coming back. If they allow the sequestered to take someone out then they have messed with the game inside the house in order to control their game as they have chosen to play it. So I think it's gonna be something lame. My question to anyone who is paying attention... I know by the time they went to bed last night they had not told them that they would be voting live. They simply thought that must be the case. Have they been told today that they will be voting live or do they still just assume this? Because I think if that is true that there has been no confirmation of when they vote yet and then with this removal of items both things are going to be tied together. It's weird that they started taking things away right after the veto was not used. Remember? If they are going to give Jack another shot at this game knowing he is the one targeted to go then he is directing the house and again that goes against his statement that they play for certain ones in the house. We shall see. I give him kudos because he got us good on this one. Now lets see what it is DANG IT!!

Misslibra

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:15 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Exactly Kaili, not tainting the jury was apparently a big issue last year which is why they sequester the evicted HG's and they aren't allowed to see anything but the comps of the show.

C1mag

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:19 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
A mole in the house? Hmmm... I don't buy it. It's a nice little twist but a bit stupid and Jack as the mole doesn't make too much sense. He only played for one side and didn't do to much damage at all. He never talked anyone into doing anything so he sucked as the mole if he was one LOL

Theo

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:21 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
I agree C1 but the battle lines in this house were drawn so early no-one not even a mole could have affected this game

C1mag

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:25 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Thats true Theo. I just think that the final answer to all of this mystery will be a bit more on the stupid side and we are all gonna be complaining about it after it's over.

Theo

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:29 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
in that my friend i have no doubt...

Dee

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:38 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Well, I'm going to vote that it's a helicopter ride or another boat trip that a hamster will win.

I wonder if there's something going on in LA tonight - an awards ceremony or something like that. Or maybe something that Coors Lite is sponsoring. (Maybe a ball game? Hey, box seats!)

R151996

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:38 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
This year's jury pool cannot be corrupted more than it already is. Housing them together lets them reinforce lies and half-truths during the sequester period, and that is much worse than letting them see everything as was done last year.

Kaili

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:42 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
I got it! Amanda was a houseguest. Her picture was removed. It's just a big (not funny) joke!

Ruditoo

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:44 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
The unexpected turn in events,sounds like BB didn't plan this one but, is dealing with it as in someone breaking the rules as in EATing. Now I like that one. Caught on tape, sneaking food. Now who's the culprit. My mind can conjure up everyone doing this except Jack.

Also I think it's suspect that Julie didn't say a word about Jee revealing he accepted POV after her direct instructions NOT to. Did she tell anyone else not to reveal their choice? I don't recall that she did,only Jee. I can see it taking time to decide what to do about that, given the whole scene with everyone else saying they didn't and that it was JEE that did. Still, he spoiled Julie's annoucement and "Disobeyed BB",but tossing him out for that I would consider rather lame as an excuse and heavy handed punsishment.

AS said they "watch" that know one breaks the rules "like eating when their on "PBJ" and Robert,Ali,Jun especialy ranted about the PBJ. Erica has to be on that same list even though I doubt she would, she seems very foucused. Unless she has a screct that only BB is aware of. She does look very very very thin.

Just having alittle fun with this don't anyone take offence.



By the way Ali's little friend did come to viist,so she said. Not that I think they would put her out if she was.

Galelia

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:45 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
What if someone is leaving the SEQUESTER house and is going back into the Big Brother house?

Scorpiomoon

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:48 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Wow...this is the first time I have come to this thread. I can't believe you guys are investing so much energy into trying to figure this out when you all know Arnie always lets us down.

It's going to be the turtles, you guys. I would bet anything they will be "removing" the turtles.

Misslibra

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:49 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Kaili some of us already said it was Amanda's picture but other's said no because a picture is a object, not a HG.

The first thing I thought was that it was Amanda's picture. :)

Seanflynn2003

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:49 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
C1 et al

The key here is the word remove. It implies, but does not definately guarantee,no coming back. If a guest is allowed to go outside but return, I would regard it as a bad red herring and misleading, but it still would not be an outright lie.

AS is also on record as to no ejected HGs returning. And to put someone new in at this point seems absurd.

To have the sequestered HGs vote off one of the HGs without replaving him/her AND adding another week seems unlikely, but maybe they have some really fun ideas (go figure) to fill up the time -- maybe a week long HoH contest and one week without nominations.

At the end, my best guess is that they are misleading us with the word remove.

Hamsterlady

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:49 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
I thought the turtles were already gone? I haven't seen them around since they closed up the Desert Room.

Denecee

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:50 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Before Jee told that it was him who accepted the POV, the other hg figured it out. I know somebody could have been lying but still they each revealed that they did not accept the POV. So they all get evicted and the sequested guest come back plus David!

Misslibra

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:52 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
They already did the turtles, and the turtles would be HG's, not HG. :)

R151996

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:54 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
The entire deal segment was edited to show only certain portions of each HG's time in the DR. Jee was the only HG to accept a deal, so it was logical to show only Julie's rule explantion to him. Jee followed the rule along with everyone else until the results that someone DID accept a deal were announced.

The HGs were shown saying goodbye to the tortoises on Saturday's show.

C1mag

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:55 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Ok heres yet another stupid thought... If they were all put on PBJ were they allowed to endulge in the mcdonalds meals? Were they all setup and they all get a penalty nomination? Just another stupid thing to think about.

Kaili

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:57 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Do you think they will physically pick up and remove the person? LOL- that's the image that "remove" brings to my mind- being carried or led out unwillingly.

Misslibra- I saw that- after I posted that I finally decided to read a few of the archives...

Also, it seems to me that all (one) of their twists since the golden veto all the time thing have been sort of a scrambled, tossed together thing with little to know promotion. It's like this year they forgot to plan for anything and are making all their decisions on what to do with the houseguests as they go along. Granted, the competitions seem pretty well planned...

As for "unexpcted"- I assume they mean unexpected for the houseguests. Still, if it was important it seems like we would have had some more clues leading up to this- like last Wednesday Julie saying to tune in for it. Wednesday is their highest viewer night-anything big should be announced then.

I know I'm going in circles- I just have no idea.

Misslibra

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:58 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
But since Jee was the only one who accepted the offer he may have been the only one givin those instruction not to talk about it. I don't remember Julie saying not to talk about it to anyone but Jee.

Charvie

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 01:59 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
My vote is the person removed will be going to a luxury outside of the house. THe only thing is how are they going to do all this? THey have the live voting, the interview of the evicted an HOH competion and probably a luxury competition. With as slow and fooling around BB likes to do I can't imagine how they are going to get that all done in an hour as well as their love of doing a half hour to an hour of recap.

Wgm

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 02:00 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Galelia, I totally agree with you. I think that BB knows that someone rigged the HOH competion in which Justin won and Nate was voted out. I think that Nate will come in after another HG will be removed. The person that could be removed is Jee because he told people that it was he who took the veto deal. Jee is the HOH and therefore his nominatios will be nulified. Jack and Erika stay in the house and Alison is evicted and will take Nate's place in the jury.

C1mag

Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 02:00 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Ok scratch my last stupid idea as a thought because Arnold said in the interview that when they break a rule they warn them and if the infraction continues then they would consider a penalty nomination. So it's not gonna be that somone broke any rules. They would have been warned. It was interesting that Jee kept reading the rule book though. Still think we are giving this more energy than it will deserve. The key will be the removal of things and how it relates to the next hoh contest and by next week someone through the hoh contest will have removed themselves from the game just like the items were removed starting right after the veto ceremony. They just probably haven't been paying attention.