Tatloopie | Tuesday, November 12, 2002 - 06:22 am     I really feel like the producers should sequester evicted HGs once they leave the house in BB4. It would make for a much more interesting show if they don't know what has been said about them thru looking at DR rants and only being able to decide who wins by what they experienced and saw while in the house. If this had been the case with BB3, I think Lisa would not have had such a landslide victory. How does anyone else feel about this? |
Toolhound | Tuesday, November 12, 2002 - 03:58 pm     I think anyone evicted in the first 3 or 4 weeks would hate everyone on the show after being sequestered 8-10 weeks. I also think part of winning is the strategy of keeping from being evicted and keeping the evicted liking you enough to vote for you to win. If you have only done one of these things you will not win. If all the players are kept in the dark about the others after eviction then we just have 12 people sitting around telling lies and the best liar wins. Sounds boring to me. |
Ruditoo | Tuesday, November 12, 2002 - 09:55 pm     The best lair did win,the power to sway who came in lst over number 2. I think they should beef up the contract they have to sign and implant them so BB can really know what they say to who. Then open up a site where we can listen and have LFT. |
Tatloopie | Wednesday, November 13, 2002 - 06:02 am     You have to realize though that BB is the only reality show where contestants who decide who ultimately wins gets to see the intimate conversations of their competitors. On Survivor, they don't get to see what has been said about them before they vote for the ultimate survivor. |
Crossfire | Wednesday, November 13, 2002 - 06:43 am     I'm not sure what the problem is here? The system in place has shown itself to be a good one that results in proper outcomes that the majority of viewers who understand the game agree with. You have to realize that to change the system in the way you suggested Dani might have won. |
Zachsmom | Wednesday, November 13, 2002 - 08:48 am     Tatloopie..then I suggest those who want to win a game without their fellow competitors hearing what is being said about them..try out for survivor.. Big Brother is a totally different type of game then Survivor! |
Misslibra | Wednesday, November 13, 2002 - 08:49 am     I agree if the HG's would have been sequestered Lisa would not have won by such a wide margin. But I don't think any HG's would want to be sequestered for so long. BB runs longer then Survivor, and BB is all the way live 24/7, where as Survivor is taped. So it makes it a lot easier for MB to keep who is saying what about who from the other's. And when they do see it, it's edited for the show. I like who won and how BB turned out this year, so I have no complaints about the way it is set up now. |
Keiffer | Wednesday, November 13, 2002 - 03:02 pm     Just to sum up mostly what has been said that I agree with so far. 1st: BB last for three months, and if you get kicked out the first week then you would have to be away from your life for a very long time, and the producers would have to make that worth while to them. Would you put them all in a single place were they could talk to each other after being evicted like they do in Survivor? 2nd: What makes BB difficult is not that you have no food, have to sleep outside, have physical challenges under the elements... but rather finding ways to get people voted off, and then laster with complete information available to the evicted get them to vote for you to win. What exactly would be the challenge if once the people left you could say anything about them you want with no reprocutions? |
Ruditoo | Wednesday, November 13, 2002 - 10:38 pm     For all of you who didn't recognize the outrageous suggestion as just that. I feel BB3 had better twist and surprizes in it than any so far and that we can expect no.4 to be even better. The sequestering of the envolved houseguest seemed just the right amount of time and I havn't heard of any complaints as to the locations they were sent to nor the money they continued to be payed. If it works don't fix it. I'm sure AS' people are aware of what we didn't like(thinks mostly to boards like this one) and we will see appropriate changes next yr. I liked the last three final line up and would give the show a B- (with a X rateing for internet viewers). |
Mlt | Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 06:17 pm     I think there is an added problem with sequestering the HGs in that, as well as not seeing what Dani said behind their backs, they also wouldn't have seen the brilliant alliance between Jason and Dani. Now, assume that Jason and Lisa had made it to the finals. Not knowing about the alliance, the vote would have been nothing more than a popularity contest - who do you like better, Lisa or Jason? I think that would have been a shame. |
Sia | Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 09:32 pm     You know, what would be as much fun as having live feeds in the BB house would be having live feeds in a SECOND house for evicted hamsters where they'd be sent to be sequestered....and it would be even MORE fun if each house could monitor the other--while thinking the feeds were going only one way!! Wake up, that's never gonna happen!! LOL! |
Toolhound | Monday, November 18, 2002 - 07:02 am     I think the perfect Big Brother 4 would be the first 4 evicted from each of the 3 Big Brother shows. And maybe a couple of extras picked by viewers from the rest of the former HouseGuests. My pick would be BB2 Will and BB3 Dani. |