Archive through August 03, 2002
TV ClubHouse: Archives: Archive Two:
What do U think next week's "New Twist" that "will send shock waves" will be?:
Archive through August 03, 2002
Spunky | Friday, August 02, 2002 - 08:02 pm     Ooops the former hg would have to be HOH for a week... |
Sanfranjoshfan | Friday, August 02, 2002 - 09:00 pm     I think the new twist shoud be this: BB should put that chemical in the jacuzzi and pool that makes the water turn a bright color if urine is introduced into it.....they should do this withOUT telling the HGs. Then the first person who discolors the water is automatically made into the week's third nominee! The rest of the HGs just get to totally freak out. LOL |
Tatyana | Friday, August 02, 2002 - 09:03 pm     If it was a BB 2 HG, I would want it to be Will, would love to see him play with their minds. ;) |
Whit4you | Friday, August 02, 2002 - 09:13 pm     Ya but Will's a doc worth at least a million (if he got any ads or endorsments etc...) I doubt he'd be willing to go on this show - he walked out a winner don't think he'd want to take that sorta chance with his current love-to-be-hated by America image. The perfect place for Will really would be to play himself on a soap "Evil Doc" but not in the sense they usually do it on soaps but basically he just plays himself within a story line on one of the soaps.. that soap would get 1000's of new viewers (all of us ya know) And once your hooked on a soap you tend to watch it for years .. the producers of soaps should do this |
Calgaryperson | Friday, August 02, 2002 - 09:40 pm     He probably blew all his money on that home they showed on BB3 two weeks ago. At least he has/had that job on NBC, as the host of that show(already put on hiatus). |
Sanfranjoshfan | Friday, August 02, 2002 - 09:41 pm     Calgary....what show was that? I was under the impression that he was hosting a reality show called "Love Shack" due to debut in the fall....or later this month. |
Kappy | Friday, August 02, 2002 - 09:57 pm     "the one that is not evicted will become the next HOH." Good one, SFJosh! Your second idea would be great fun for the live feed watchers if nothing else! |
Bohawkins | Friday, August 02, 2002 - 10:04 pm     I am holding to the theory which I advanced on the other thread of the same topic (in which most of the same theories given here were presented). My thought is that since it is already a matter of course that the jury which decides the final winner is made up of evicted houseguests, the new twist is simply that the jury begins its activity now. The four (after Thursday) will vote along with current houseguests on each eviction. This means that a tie will be impossible from then on, because there will always be a voting jury of 9 (three always ineligible). Last year the voting got strange as the numbers diminished. I think this combined (and ever changing) jury approach will make for interesting nominations, and people playing for the cameras to influence the hidden jury of banished people. |
Eden | Saturday, August 03, 2002 - 09:21 am     I don't like that idea at all, Bo. Wasn't that the problem with BB1, the houseguests had no reason to scheme since they didn't make the evictions? Your scenario would set up the same sort of "one big happy family" bunch of HGs that was such a doze before. If anyone other than the people in the house have a say in who goes the drama leaks out of watching them because no one will want to be heard or seen scheming. In my opinion, the players have to be able to actively influence votes and manipulate fellow HGs in order for this game to be fun! Having them be prey to an ever increasing jury of non-HGs would ruin the best dynamic of the game. |
Cajunrambler | Saturday, August 03, 2002 - 02:25 pm     The only logical thing is for someone or the house to override the veto like they do in congress. |
Lexie | Saturday, August 03, 2002 - 02:34 pm     What it there isn't a veto.... would that "someone" be able to take the power and use it ?? |
Nessietessie | Saturday, August 03, 2002 - 02:41 pm     I think Lori, Tonya, and Amy will come back to the house on Thursday night. I think they will be able to vote for eviction, but not win the game. I think all the evictees will stay in the house and vote each week with the others. They will not enter any contests and will have plenty of food to eat. The ones who are left in the game will have to kiss *** to the ones who are evicted in order to get their vote, so they are not eliminated. |
Kellirippa | Saturday, August 03, 2002 - 02:58 pm     That is possible nessietessie, last year were they not removing chairs around the table as hg were eliminated? This year all chairs remain, makes you say hmmmmmm |
Woofy | Saturday, August 03, 2002 - 03:21 pm     I'VE GOT IT! They're going to introduce a tapeworm into the PB&J ... that will generate lots of entertainment value for all. |
Zeyna | Saturday, August 03, 2002 - 03:24 pm     Good point Kell! They did remove those chairs last year, and the table got smaller and smaller as each HG left. |
Puttergirl | Saturday, August 03, 2002 - 03:30 pm     Nessietessie, I love your idea!! Imagine all the butt kissing that would go on. I think it would be more fun to go back in as one of the jury members than to still be playing the game!! Good idea, but alas, I doubt that BB is that creative! |
Puttergirl | Saturday, August 03, 2002 - 03:35 pm     I've got an idea that takes Nessietessie's and takes it one step further. How many of you have played in a double-elimination match play tournament. You're not out until you lose twice! Losers go into a loser bracket, and the last person left in the loser bracket plays the winner for the cash. What if all of the evicted hgs return and keep playing the game as before, except each week we would now have an evictee from the winner bracket and the loser bracket. The final "loser" and the winner go head to head at the end in a winner take all competition. |
Cheerleader | Saturday, August 03, 2002 - 03:41 pm     I think the twist will be that the person that has the power of veto also gets to put someone up in the person they veto's place! I hope so...then we can get josh out of there! |
Wcv63 | Saturday, August 03, 2002 - 03:43 pm     Interesting concepts but the only evictee I'd like to see back in the house is Amy. Possibly Lori. Not Tonya. I do wonder what interesting twist Arnie has up his sleeve. For some reason I keep thinking that it's gonna be something to thumb his nose at the internet viewers. Don't know how. Don't know what. But he does seem to feel as if we are his adversaries. |
Wink | Saturday, August 03, 2002 - 03:44 pm     Nessie I really like your idea altho the idea of having to listen to Tonya for the next 6 weeks kind of puts a damper on it for me. |
Wink | Saturday, August 03, 2002 - 03:45 pm     Well there ya go Wcv. If he wants to thumb his nose at the internet viewers putting Tonya back will accomplish that goal. You people will be watching FOTH ad nauseum. |
Kellirippa | Saturday, August 03, 2002 - 05:21 pm     I've got it!! They intend to turn the hg's world upside down by introducing a POT BELLIED PIG into the house!!! |
Espen | Saturday, August 03, 2002 - 05:54 pm     Does anyone else wonder if the mention (and footage) of Hardy could be "foreshadowing" for what might happen on Thursday? If they did bring Hardy back (for a while at least) it would support that rumor last week, and be pretty interesting at that.. Especially if Eric is gone.. Unlikely I know, but makes you go "hmmmm" |
Emelbe | Saturday, August 03, 2002 - 06:40 pm     I doubt this is the "twist", but I would like it if the person who wins the pov gets to choose from three different options. 1. Leave it alone 2. "Save" a person from elimination (HOH picks replacement) 3. Pick a third candidate for eviction I think that would add even more strategy to the game, but also might make alliances a bit stronger. |
Bohawkins | Saturday, August 03, 2002 - 06:42 pm     Well, Eden, your critique of my conjecture is a good one. However, in my opinion, it would have perhaps have more validity if the BB1 viewer voting, and the BB3 jury idea was totally a parallel comparison. However, in BB1 the remaining houseguests had no vote at all, only the call-in viewers. In the jury scenario I describe for BB3 the existing houseguests would start off with the majority power; five votes vs four on the jury. The next week, the power would shift to the jury, but old loyalties might remain or falter. Two keys are important. First, remaining houseguests would always contribute until the the point where the jury would the same structure and power as when the game ended last year. Secondly, what might be interesting about this concept is that (like we saw in Survivor) original alliances could change with the evicted players. Plus, with a "dynamic jury" approach, we could see those old alliances change week by week. Existing houseguests would play to the banned houseguests the way they do now. But, up to now (and last year), they were just hoping for their good grace on the final vote should they be in the final two, but instead of a "maybe, someday" thing, it would be quite precipitous each week. However, it might turn out to be the same old "one big happy family" you mentioned, and that would be a real drag. |
|