Tonya being sequestered...article in Las Vegas Paper link
The ClubHouse: General Discussion Archives: Tonya being sequestered...article in Las Vegas Paper link
Barbiedoll | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:05 am     http://www.lvrj.com/lvrj_home/2002/Jul-28-Sun-2002/news/19288385.html |
Marcieb | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:13 am     Thanks for the link! I have a question, though. I remember Tonya saying she adored one of her ex-husbands, they "got along GREAT." Could there have been another one before these two (who don't seem to care all that much for her if one's got and the other's seeking custody of the kids)? And with all the finger snapping, could anyone keep straight which ex she was referring to? |
Grannygrunt | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:14 am     Hey, thanks for the link. Very interesting reading. What DOES Arnie have up his sleeve?? |
Jan | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:22 am     OK here is my question on the sequestering. If the plan is to let one or more HG back into the house...how are they going to do it fairly? Either the evicted HG will be at a decided disadvantage as they have been sequestered, have not seen the shows, have not been in the house and, therefore, have no idea what has been going on. (and on top of that, if they aren't allowed TV etc or outside contact they will be going absolutely stircrazy!) or...if they are allowed to see the TV shows and the internet feeds, they will know way, way too much and it will be decidely unfair for the existing HG's Now I doubt Arnold worries about fairness....my question actually is: Which way will Arnold go...keep them in the dark or let them know everything? |
Angelbleu | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:25 am     Oh boy is Amy in for a shock.....she is all excited to get out of the house so she can resume her life....what a slap in the face this will be!!! |
Maris | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:25 am     They may be sequestering the HGs just to keep the game honest. I am not sure what the rules of the game are but I am assuming that the evicted HGs have to vote on the winner. Their vote should be based on their experiences in the house with the remaining players and not on anything they learned outside the house. Lets face it, Tonya would never vote for Danielle to win if she learned about what Dani said after she was evicted. |
Csnog | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:32 am     I am wondering if when they get 3 evicted HG that they will be able to choose either the HOH or Who will be evicted out of the 2 nominees that week. |
Wilsonatmd | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:39 am     I think the twist will be near the half-way mark....notice they said the sequestering was "for an indeterminite period". The evicted HG may have some information I think, even the Survivor jury got to see the tribal councils. My guess is Arnie is going to wait until he thinks the time is right, bring one of the evicted HG's back, then release the rest of them. Keeping them until the end doesn't make sense, and they would have been told about it beforehand if they were going to do it. |
Grannygrunt | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:40 am     I am trying to remember on Survivor when they bring back the ones who have been evicted. Seems like I remember them coming to the Tribal Council and listening to what the others say. Am I delirious? Too much BB3? Is it just on the last night of the final show? Someone please refresh my memory. (having a senior moment I guess). Maybe the evictees get to listen to why the next one got evicted. I would imagine Amy would pitch a royal fit if they tried to keep her there for the remaining time. Ole Miss football starts a couple of weeks from now. And she really wants to be home for that. I live just outside Memphis and I am hoping our local TV station says something about it. Will keep you posted if any news breaks here about what they are gonna do. |
Duncan | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:40 am     I think it might be kind of cool if one of the evictees is made HoH. That could stir up the pot some. Hmmmm....two 10 minute phone calls per week? Think Tonya has called her kids yet? |
Wcv63 | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:40 am     I didn't read anywhere online that Tonya was accusing her first husband of domestic abuse as that article alledges. If she said something to that effect it must have been FOTHed or I missed it totally. Perhaps he's taking a proactive defensive position before any allegations are made? |
Ketchuplover | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:41 am     Did the HG's know about the sequestering before entering the house? Lori works in a bank. Does her employer know where she is? I believe it is against the law to restrict a persons movement without their consent. I smell a lawsuit. |
Angelbleu | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:46 am     From the way they are talking about what they are going to do when they leave I don't think they know they are going to be sequestered and they have even discussed who would be there to meet them when they are evicted. But they are under contract for a year.....and remember when Marcie said after they talked to BB about walking out that it would not be that easy....that CBS owned them... |
Tabbyking | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:49 am     i think their contracts mentioned 'up to 100 days' or something thereabouts. it did not say it had to be IN the bb house. how awful, though, to think you were out, which already meant you couldn't win...only to find out you were still a captive, but maybe all alone! if they knew in advance, they would fight to stay in the house! i doubt even lori and tonya are together because then lori could find out what tonya learned since she left, which might affect lori's final vote, etc. two 10-minute calls a week and they are 'listened in on'. |
Northwestmom | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:53 am     I'm sure that they all knew/anticipated (hoped!) that they could be in that house until September and scribbled their names on to a contract that gave Arnold this piece of their lives. I can't wait to see whatever he has in store for them and the houseguests. I'm smiling knowing that Tonya is holed up in a hotel and not making the rounds on all the talk shows as the poster child for silicone enhancement. |
Floresmama | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:54 am     Yes the HGs knew about the sequestering they have talked about it. I think that in the past they haven't been sequested and have been able to find out everything. I think that ASP should let them watch the feeds and nothing more. The fact that they can't talk about the show leads me to think that they are not being allowed any media sources which would be pretty boring. But we already know from this group and last years that BB doesn't do that good of a job keeping the HGs under control when they are in the hotel. |
Loriwillwin | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 11:01 am     What is the value of sequestering? How can Tonya, or Lori, make a good judgment of who has played the game best if they can't watch TV/feeds? This way, it turns into a popularity contest: yeah, Roddy, I'll vote for him 'cause he seemed nice enough. They would have no idea about whether Roddy played the game well, winning challenges, making good nomination decisions, not losing his temper, not violating the "trust" of those he needed to keep as allies, etc. What if, in the next few weeks, Josh turns into a "comeback kid" kind of the way Will did last year? Lots of people respected the way Will toughed out all his nominations with calm and dignity. If Tonya, Lori, etc. don't get to see this stuff, how can they properly determine who the winner should be? |
Jesse | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 11:09 am     During the first week of the live feeds (which seems like eons ago now) I remember Gerry and Lori talking about what a bummer it would be to be sequestered after eviction for the duration of the show . . . their convo impied that sequestering was a possibility, but they didn't seem to have any more info than that (i.e. purpose for sequestering, what access to outside info they would have, etc.) |
Woofy | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 11:26 am     My guess is that these guys didn't bother to read their contracts ... or if they did, they didn't know what they'd signed. I remember Curtis during BB1 saying that he did read the contract and was really shocked how CBS and the production company really had total control over them for a period that expended PAST the run of the show. As an attorney, he didn't like that. But he signed anyway because (a) he received the contracts literally "just before" he was dragged off to the show, and (b) cuz he realized that if he didn't sign them, he wouldn't be on the show. |
Thefan | Monday, July 29, 2002 - 01:25 pm     Wouldn't it be cool if they are in another house with 24/7 cameras and a "new BB" is going on there with a twist. Every week, a new HG is brought it, the one who just got booted. Now that would be cool to watch. |
|