Realitytvaddict | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 08:50 am     Okay, the show could make Eric use the veto this week. I like it. This way things are going to get interesting instead of Amy just being thrown out like this. It is really upsetting to me that they have no heart when it comes to her eviction. Also, since Mar has already been saved before he can't be saved this time. Amy will automatically be spared and then they have to nominate someone else. |
Eliz87 | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 08:53 am     Interesting point. I didn't know that a person couldn't be "saved" twice. |
Realitytvaddict | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 08:54 am     I made up that part! lol I'm trying to give this game a new life. It is dying out quickly from what I see. I just don't see how the producers that LOVED Amy are going to let her just go out of this house. Maybe it's just wishful thinking on my part. ;) |
Anneph | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:18 am     I think it should have been that whoever got the power of veto should also be the one to name the replacement - that would really twist things up. I would love to see Amy and Marc BOTH saved this week somehow - though I know it isn't going to happen. Wouldn't it be a hoot if Eric chose to save Marc - then nominated Roddy as a "joke" - and it came back and slapped him upside that cocky little head of his!!! |
Marcieb | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:36 am     Anne--you are so deliciously twisted! I was thinking before the competition maybe Chiara had the you-know-whats to mess with Rodman that way. But now that it's Eric, that would be priceless--or as Amy says incessently, "CLASSIC!" Yea, Eric has all this pent-up hostility at being Roddy's whipping boy and he puts him on the block! Can't wait! |
Mystery | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 10:51 am     I think the rule should be, a person who doesn't use the power of veto must join the others as nominees for eviction. I also like the idea that the POV person could choose the replacement, or maybe they should make it totally random and pull names from a hat and make THAT person choose the replacement. |
Spunky | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 11:11 am     Then if they're forced to use veto it's no longer having "power of veto". Power means also to decline if they want to. However, the rule should have stated that veto must be used and if you don't intend to use it (because you like the nominations as they are) you should forfeit the challenge beforehand. |
Paulyaceiii | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 11:46 am     I like that one, Spunky....use it, but you cant lose it.. Maybe a better idea would be this: If a HG fails to use his/her veto, he/she would be ineligible for HOH the following round, along with the HOH, until the field is down to less than 5. |
Pirate | Sunday, July 28, 2002 - 11:50 am     I'm scatching my head Realitytvaddict trying to follow your logic. Having to use the veto and not being able to save a person the second time just defeats the purpose. They wouldn't have even needed to have the contest this week. Amy would have been automatically saved, so why would Roddy even nominate her? Anneph, I like your suggestion. That would really shake things up. Or how about, a HG can not be nominated twice in a row, just like a HG can not be HoH twice in a row. |