Archive through July 25, 2002
MoveCloseDeleteAdmin

The ClubHouse: General Discussion Archives: Archive Two: Eric just told Roddy !!! Third base it is!!: Archive through July 25, 2002

Wcv63

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 09:48 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Don't know wink but know what it sounds like!!

Heyteach

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 10:27 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
And to think I have just been wandering around out here in right field! What I really don't understand is why there was no hint of all this on tonight's show. You wouldn't think they would miss the chance to tittilate (would that be second base????) the viewers. Maybe there is a bit of coaching going on in the DR hoping for a score???

Maris

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 10:39 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
It would depend on who you are, for example someone Like Tonya, first base might be a home run to us regular folk, second base for her is the ring and the home run is the divorce and alimony.

Marcellasfan

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 10:41 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
LOL. Classic, Maris!

Mssilhouette

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 10:42 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
LMAO wow BB sure brings about the most interesting of conversations.

We're discussing what exactly is 3rd base! LOL Too funny.

I think we can agree that 3rd base is a manlipuation of the gentials using hand and in some cases mouth. I'm going to assume from those feed pix that it was mostly hand jive going on. Since doing it orally would grab the serious attention of the camera folks.

Sanfranjoshfan

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 10:48 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Still picking on poor Clinton....tsk tsk tsk....actually, according to Merriam-Webster's....Bill Clinton did NOT have sexual "relations" with whatsername. (see # 2 and #3 under "plural" in the definition below)

I don't think they have a definition for first, second and third base, though. :-)


http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=relations

Main Entry: re·la·tion
Pronunciation: ri-'lA-sh&n
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English relacioun, from Middle French relation, from Latin relation-, relatio, from referre (past participle relatus) to carry back
Date: 14th century
1 : the act of telling or recounting : ACCOUNT
2 : an aspect or quality (as resemblance) that connects two or more things or parts as being or belonging or working together or as being of the same kind <the relation of time and space>; specifically : a property (as one expressed by is equal to, is less than, or is the brother of) that holds between an ordered pair of objects
3 : the referring by a legal fiction of an act to a prior date as the time of its taking effect
4 a (1) : a person connected by consanguinity or affinity : RELATIVE (2) : a person legally entitled to a share of the property of an intestate b : relationship by consanguinity or affinity : KINSHIP
5 : REFERENCE, RESPECT <in relation to>
6 : the attitude or stance which two or more persons or groups assume toward one another <race relations>
7 a : the state of being mutually or reciprocally interested (as in social or commercial matters) b plural (1) : DEALINGS, AFFAIRS <foreign relations> (2) : INTERCOURSE (3) : SEXUAL INTERCOURSE

Lurknomore

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 10:52 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Mss the great part is we are sitting here discussing what is third base is and we are still on topic LOLOL

Sanfranjoshfan

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 10:53 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Lurknomore....omigod....we have become the sex-pack! YIKES!

Wcv63

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 10:54 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
SanFran wasn't picking on Clinton. That whole "trial" was an outrage if you ask me. It was conducted by hypocrits. Point is that he stated that he did NOT have "sexual relations" with that woman. Later he apologized and was hauled up on perjury accusations.

Twas not MY definition prior to that mess.

Kat

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 10:59 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Not going to get into a big tangent here but in the Paula Jones trial the judge had set a very specific and limited definition of what sexual relations was. By the definition set forth by the judge in the Jones trial Clinton was able to skirt the issue.

Sanfranjoshfan

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 11:02 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
"skirt the issue?"

Hmmmmmmm......was that a blue, stained one?

LOL

Sanfranjoshfan

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 11:03 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Somebody email that judge and get a legal definition of what constitues "third base".

Btw, are the bases loaded?

Can one legally STEAL base?

Kat

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 11:08 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
I am getting into my teacher mode, but in the Paula Jones trial the judge together with the attorneys for both side negotiated a definition of sexual relations which basically came down to it being defined as an activity which brought sexual satisfaction and stimulation to the woman. This is where he was able to get around the issue since the activities they engaged in had NOTHING to do with Miss Lewinskys obtaining any kind of satisfaction. That is why President Clinton answered in his deposition that he didn't have sexual relations with Miss Lewinsky. It also explains his famous quote about the definition of "is"

Wcv63

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 11:10 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Sexual satisfaction to the woman? As a woman I can state that I've had sexual relations a lot less than my husband thinks I have! :)

Sanfranjoshfan

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 11:17 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Wcv63 - ROTFLMAO!!!!

(careful....does he read these boards?)

Sanfranjoshfan

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 11:19 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
"since the activities they engaged in had NOTHING to do with Miss Lewinskys obtaining any kind of satisfaction."

Now we gotta define "satisfaction".....I was under the impression that Ms L got a great deal of satisfaction for her performance. She never said she didn't enjoy anything she did with him.

Wcv63

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 11:20 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Well come on now, if Meg Ryan can do it so can the rest of us!

Sanfranjoshfan

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 11:21 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Wcv - Meg Ryan? Huh? I may be dense but I don't know what you mean....

Wcv63

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 11:23 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Never saw "When Harry met Sally" and witnessed that infamous diner scene where she simulates sexual satisfaction?

Sanfranjoshfan

Wednesday, July 24, 2002 - 11:27 pm EditMoveDeleteIP
Doh! Okay....I get it now.

Vinnyinla

Thursday, July 25, 2002 - 12:12 am EditMoveDeleteIP
Back to the subject of this board: Eric was using Lisa's "Palm Pilot"

Sanfranjoshfan

Thursday, July 25, 2002 - 12:24 am EditMoveDeleteIP
At least they were discreet....now, only the whole world knows about it.

Squaredsc

Thursday, July 25, 2002 - 06:19 am EditMoveDeleteIP
rotflmao, this is 2 hysterical. but im glad we got the definitions of the bases clear 'cause my boys will be teenagers in a couple of years and i will need to know what they are talking about.

Sobaditsgood

Thursday, July 25, 2002 - 06:31 am EditMoveDeleteIP
Anyone else find it funny that Eric runs to Roddy to regale him with this stuff... and meanwhile Roddy is lecturing Chiara about how 'if we wanted everybody to know what we were doing we wouldn't do it under covers' - hah, can you say double standard?! Ok not technically since Roddy isn't the one telling, he's only listening, but I haven't noticed anybody posting on the LF's that Roddy lectured Eric about kissing and telling, like: 'Eric, that's great and all but I think you shouldn't be here telling me this, it might upset Lisa if she knew and she might not care for the whole world to know it. She seems like a more reserved girl than that.' Has anybody gotten the sense at ALL that Roddy in any way was uncomfortable hearing about it or discouraged Eric from talking about it? I doubt it because the man is playing the game, I think way 'deeper' than anyone else, he's just more low key about it. He LOVES to know what everyone else is doing in as much detail as possible, it plays into his hand.

And I agree with whoever said in a different thread that he's just screwing around (no pun intended) with Chiara to manipulate her for her usefulness in the game. He obviously fancies himself superior to most folks.. I cannot see him *really* hooking up with someone of Chiara's, uh, caliber ... with or without the 'insanely beautiful body' or whatever line he fed her last. Drunk driving? Fooling around with quasimarried men? I dunno, it's just a hunch but I think Roddy would not spend much time with a Chiara type in the real world.

Jan

Thursday, July 25, 2002 - 06:46 am EditMoveDeleteIP
sobad actually it wasn't that Eric came to Roddy boasting about his sexcapades...Roddy interrogated him and got him to admit it. Then Eric said "don't tell Lisa as I promised her I wouldn't tell you" ...and that occurred shortly Eric had lectured the women on how men didn't gossip like women do

so these two are all about double standards for men and women!