Hummingbird | Thursday, September 26, 2002 - 09:17 pm     No contest! It was Marcellus. Did he do anything right? Not using the Golden Veto was the clincher to a poorly played game. |
Adrian | Thursday, September 26, 2002 - 09:19 pm     No brainer. Marcellas. |
Whit4you | Thursday, September 26, 2002 - 10:04 pm     I third that. |
Wendo | Thursday, September 26, 2002 - 10:12 pm     And a fourth here. |
Eden | Thursday, September 26, 2002 - 10:13 pm     Roddy. He was so SURE he was so much smarter than everyone else. He thought this game was going to be a cakewalk. He was shocked to learn differently. |
Itsallgood | Friday, September 27, 2002 - 04:43 am     Fifth that!! LOL Maybe one day Marc will get it. |
Craziel | Friday, September 27, 2002 - 06:03 am     Amy, even more so than Marcellus. Marcellus was vicious and self-centred, but Amy didn't seem to even be aware there was a game going on. It seemed like a big holiday in a house with strangers to her. I dislike Marcellus much more, however. Amy seems to be a nice girl, just not very aware of her surroundings. |
Itsallgood | Friday, September 27, 2002 - 06:10 am     I believe Amy stated that was why she was there! Of course if she got to the finals that was ok too. LOL In my opinion it worked to her advantage, even being on the block 6 times. And look at all she won! I say she did a great job and got some Life Lessons as well! I know this thread is for the worst, but, she was who I was behind 100% from day one! JMO |
Babyruth | Friday, September 27, 2002 - 07:57 am     Agree with the Roddy choice. I guess he thought nobody would catch on to his manipulations if he kept telling them how honest and ethical he was--LOL |
Woodpecke® | Friday, September 27, 2002 - 08:00 am     Marcellas was the worst person, Roddy was the worst player. Roddy made zero positive moves. He was an expert at getting people evicted whenever he got close to them. |
Zachsmom | Friday, September 27, 2002 - 08:42 am     Danielle.. In my eyes for this reason and this reason only. She continually berated Amy with her drinking..making comments that she (Amy) has a problem with it.. Yet one night she (Danielle) not once, not twice but three times tried to get Amy to drink wine..then not a half hour later tried to give Amy a beer.. For what strategic purpose this could serve is beyond me..it was low..below the belt..most despicable act one could do..especially when her mantra was "For my babies"..to try to get someone who you believe has an alcohol problem to drink so you can bring the money home for your babies is just plain sickening and should not be rewarded.. and if it wasn't for strategic purposes..then it was for personal reasons and that is even lower.. Just my humble opinion.. |