Was what Josh did a harmless prank?

The ClubHouse: Big Brother 2000: General - Archives: Questions, questions and more questions: Was what Josh did a harmless prank?
 SubtopicMsgs  Last Updated
Archive through September 28, 2000 25   09/28 06:48pm

Voyeur

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 07:07 pm Click here to edit this post

Realize that the HG believe that only four of the cameras are "internet" cameras, and Eddie identified the one that indicated itself as an internet camera, and Josh probably believes that at worst (or best?) a camera in the camera cross got him and he knows they wouldn't show that on TV without "covering up."

Battlestar

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 07:27 pm Click here to edit this post

Zyxoid----Piffle

Moon

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 07:27 pm Click here to edit this post

it's a good point that anger should be directed at the camera choice and not at josh.. but one thing I do have to take issue with was the statement that "boy's will be boys" how many people both male and female have to be hurt by a good old boy society slogan that condones lack of personal judgement???

Josette

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 07:29 pm Click here to edit this post

Have you not read the warning on the
website where the live feeds are? NOT for
younger viewers. Don't watch and then •••••.
And if your kids were watching, that's your
damn fault for not having Net Nanny. I am
tired of people being so easily shocked.

I'd rather see genitals than PUKING any day
of the week. Now THAT was disgusting. I won't
watch again, lest the fratboys start another
hurlfest.

but quit griping. There IS a warning that
this is where people LIVE and party and get
NUDE and anything can happen, language-wise
and otherwise. grow up

Ocean_Islands

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 07:29 pm Click here to edit this post

If any children were allowed to watch the live feeds by their parents, those parents should be arrested for child abuse.

Josette

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 07:33 pm Click here to edit this post

Why is it sweet and adorable for Josh to drunkenly expose himself to half the world on the internet--even if it is to adults--when the local pervert would be arrested for doing the same thing in a parking lot from under a trench coat?

===the difference is that YOU are tuning in to watch BY CHOICE, not being FORCED. You might
expect to see some R-rated stuff with three
20 something men alone with drinks in a house.
You fill in the URL and sit there. That's
not the same as someone exposing themselves
to you on a parking lot.

case closed.

Voyeur

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 07:48 pm Click here to edit this post

Call CPS then. I keep the live feeds running while I work in the kitchen with my 6 year old and 1 1/2 year old nearby. I'm sure they have glanced at it every now and then. It wouldn't even bother me if they saw HG nude or even engaging in sex. It would however bother me if they were to see them beating the crap out of each other, or knifing or shooting each other.

Lafatme

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 08:15 pm Click here to edit this post

kearie, i'm playing twister now! LOL (where are you, it's your turn)

Curtandeddie

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 08:27 pm Click here to edit this post

The problem I have is with you calling Josh a sex offender. I suppose the woman on the German BB who repeatedly exposed her breasts is a sex offender as well in that case. NOT.

Curtandeddie

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 08:30 pm Click here to edit this post

PS I am specifically referring to your first thread where you out and out called him a sex offender. You cleaned it up for this thread. Anyway, I still don't agree with you.

Jimmer

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 08:53 pm Click here to edit this post

It really baffles me why so many Americans think that nudity is a bad thing. Can someone explain that?

Kearie

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 08:56 pm Click here to edit this post

I'm right here LAF.

Left foot on blue

Omigosh you utterly crack me up.

Mbliving

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 08:57 pm Click here to edit this post

I don't know what the big deal is here. My kids do not watch the livefeeds, its stressed that it is for adults only. The shows did much better in Europe where nudity and sex was part of the BB experience.

He was drunk, he's young and he was letting it all hang out, literaly.

Caged

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 09:01 pm Click here to edit this post

My God People!~ Must you make a BIG DEAL out of every little issue? They were DRUNK....Didn't you ever do anything crazy when you were drunk? If your answer is no, whether drunk or sober, I think you need to go shopping......FOR A LIFE!! Ocean~You're so perfect? Every time I read something from you, you are always critizing someone. Remember the old saying..."People shouldn't throw stones at glass houses."

Lafatme

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 09:26 pm Click here to edit this post

kearie, sorry, i decided to catch up with the guys so i had a few beers and am now lying FLAT on my face. (oww)

Kearie

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 09:29 pm Click here to edit this post

lol

just when I was about to put my left hand on Green. Move your booty and let the games continue.

Renee

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 10:08 pm Click here to edit this post

Why did you single out Josh? There are now nude pictures of Josh And Eddie on the net, as well as the previous ones of Britt, why hold him to a different standard than the other guy?

Whit4you

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 10:22 pm Click here to edit this post

FLASHING CHILDREN??? For christ sakes... some people are so desperate to put their fantasies into words it's pathetic. ANY parent who allows their child on the net - to view a site who's got more "disclaimers" about "NOT SCRIPTED, NOT SUITABLE FOR CHILDREN" - and then acts outraged because they might happen to see a "gasp" penis
and THEN act OUTRAGED because of it.. needs to be shot.

FIRST of all there is NOTHING wrong with a PENIS - it's a part of every man's body dead / or alive.
There's nothing bad/ dirty or disgusting about it.
If anyone HERE is stupid / or brain dead enough to think the "worst" thing an unsupervised child will be EXPOSED to is a man's PENIS - then they really need to get educated or take their computer OUT of their house IMMMEDIATELY.

The same child left UNSUPERVISED also has access to things beyond most peoples wildest imagination.

The people judging CBS or Josh for exposing his PENIS - need to really THINK - think damn hard about reality these days.

If you allow your child on the net alone and unsupervised - you are subjecting him or her to the feeding ground of pedofiles everdywhere.
Anyone judging JOSH or CBS for this public display of a male PENIS - obviously has those perverse thoughts in mind to begin with. Keep in mind every pedofile out there has those same thoughts and will act upon them in this new candy-store for pedofiles.

If YOU as a parent - let your child be exposed to a male PENIS - when he/she wasn't old enough or mature enough to understand there is nothing WRONG with one of those *things* / nothing dirty/ disgusting or pervers about them. Then you as a PARENT need to wake up and smell the coffe and realize that if your child has access to THIS unsupervised then there are many things that would make you faint/ would shock you/ would chock even the most open minded adult. BE a parent don't leave it up to Josh or CBS.

Until your child is ready/ able to handle/ comprehend or understand things I wouldn't even mention here - things that make BDSM pale in compairson - then YOU need to take care of watching your child - not hold CBS and Hosh responsible for your child!

I laugh - when I see posts saying "gosh Josh is showing his PENIS to 6 yr old girls!!"
any fuggin parent who would let their 6 yr old child alone unsupervised on a site of unscripted 20 yr olds being themselves needs to get a CLUE... but if they are truely doing this I doubt they could get a clue if they were in a herd of clues covered in clue musk in the middle of clue matting season.

Josh did NOTHING wrong - CBS has enough disclaimers on it's live feeds that any parent pathetic enough to allow a 6 yr old unsupervised on this site - is disgusting in my eyes.


And YOU - the one who's looking at Josh exposing his PENIS and envisioning 6 yr olds all over the country watching unsupervised - needs counseling!!
GET IT FAST! TRUTH HURTS! But my comments here are to protect the children the net is a feeding ground for pedofiles - CBS and JOSH are the least of our problems - parents who leave their children alone / unsupervised in this feeding ground IS.

my point? I do have one - you were grasping at straws - it was beyond pathetic and I AM CALLING YOU ON IT!

Lafatme

Thursday, September 28, 2000 - 11:21 pm Click here to edit this post

okay, booty appropriately moved.

Sanfranjoshfan

Friday, September 29, 2000 - 12:55 am Click here to edit this post

Zyxokid-

The answer to your question (the name of this thread) is simple:

Yes, what Josh did was a harmless prank.

(Go Josh Go)