Archive through September 07, 2000

The ClubHouse: Big Brother 2000: General - Favorites: Big Brother and astrology: Archive through September 07, 2000

Geistlich

Saturday, September 02, 2000 - 04:48 pm Click here to edit this post

Well, let's see here - the hg's are going to be training Pugita. I've trained a lot of dogs and it's not exactly gripping viewing. So a wander down the OT path seems entirely appropriate to me :)

It is screamingly obvious who the "tells people what they want to hear while being rather self-serving" person is, but then I COULD be blinded by my preconceived notions! And frankly the good stuff about the other did surprise me. I'm pretty cynical about the whole thing but support them anyhow since the one I really wanted lost in the primaries. Hopefully Mr Smary is in for a loss.

So.... what's George writing on his Jello-ink signs now anyhow?

Scoobettenq

Saturday, September 02, 2000 - 05:35 pm Click here to edit this post

OK. Mom's final predictions for BB banishments and the winner. This is assuming that after the next one, the banishments will be 1 per week on Wed nights leaving the final 3 on 9/27, and winner announced 9/30. Didn't bother with nominations this time because with a small group it doesn't matter who the race is between. If these dates aren't correct then I don't know what to tell ya...lol

Banishments:

9/13 - Jamie

9/20 - George

9/27 - Josh

Final 3: Curtis, Cassandra, Eddie.

Winner: Cassandra

Yes I asked if she's sure, she says that Cass is the one with the stars all lining up in her favor. I didn't ask her to write up all of the reasoning this time because she's put so much time into this already while working full time and doing readings on her days off.

This should be really interesting to see how it plays out! We'll see, I guess... :)

Scoobettenq

Saturday, September 02, 2000 - 05:42 pm Click here to edit this post

OH and as for the walkout on Wednesday for the 10 grand. She said that George is the only one of them that she even halfway feels might do it. She doubts he'll go though. The rest she says not even a chance.

IF on an off chance he walks, that will change the dates for the future banishments (who knows how CBS will rearrange it) so the predictions will change. But I think he'll stay. :)

Geistlich

Saturday, September 02, 2000 - 05:51 pm Click here to edit this post

Cool - I will be happy to see it work out that way. Many thanks to you and your Mom!

Why

Saturday, September 02, 2000 - 09:28 pm Click here to edit this post

Somehow, some way, we need to get a message to George that says "Teresa says take the money"! Oh how I wish he'd take the dough and go!

Ccc

Saturday, September 02, 2000 - 11:03 pm Click here to edit this post

Scoob, just wanted to make sure you didn't think that I was inferring bias by your Mom watching the shows.

I was thinking about something she said about Britt "Is she working positive traits ... by being centered, direct,... Or is she falling back on negative traits ... by acting scattered, superficial, ... so the way she chooses to conduct herself in this situation will have a direct impact on whether or not she'll win the cash."

Sounded to me like the way Britt chose to deal might determine the outcome. I just figured that she started watching to see how the people seemed to be handling themselves - so she'd have greater insight as to what path they were taking.

ccc

Ccc

Saturday, September 02, 2000 - 11:05 pm Click here to edit this post

duplicate post

Fruitbat

Sunday, September 03, 2000 - 04:58 am Click here to edit this post

Thanks Mom! This is very interesting. Who do you think will nominate Jamie other than Eddie? I thought she may miss being up again.

This is the best thread. I have a lot of faith in Astrology.

Fruitbat

Tuesday, September 05, 2000 - 07:52 am Click here to edit this post

Scoo. Can you ask your Mom.....What is going on in Eddies chart this week? His behavior is seen by some to be more extreme than usual and he is certainly taking some heat today.

Munch

Tuesday, September 05, 2000 - 11:46 am Click here to edit this post

Scoo,

I know a little about astrology and I respect the science and I respect you and your mom too.

Astrology is a big help in determining the tendencies or probabilities.

But I think there is a good chance someone (especially Cass) may take the $20K.

It depends how it is offered. It is much more likely someone will take it if they announce the nominations first.

If only two HG's are nominated, and say one of them is Josh, then anyone up against Josh will almost certainly be banished. And I think they know that. So they would be very likely to take the $20K.

It will be interesting to see if the producers are smart enough to offer the $20K after telling them the nominations. It would be pretty funny if they didn't do it that way.

Dee1953

Tuesday, September 05, 2000 - 12:15 pm Click here to edit this post

If Cassandra has the stars lined up on her side,
I sure hope she doesn't exercise her free will and take the money.

Also, I was looking at the charts. Alot of these people, imo, have karmic ties. This is why they are so civilized to each other.

Eddie has Neptune at 20 degrees Sag.
George has Saturn at 20 degree Sag.
Early on Eddie said that George was like a father figure to him and maybe in a past life he was.
Ed is not able to see what George is up to.

Just a couple of other observations:
Curtis has 3 degrees Leo on the cusp of his 5th
house (romance)
and Jamie's moon is 3 degrees Leo
Curtis has Jupiter at 13 Sag.
Jamie has Neptune at 13 Sag.
These 2 may be more attracted to each other than they are letting on.

Just a couple of thoughts...

Fruitbat

Tuesday, September 05, 2000 - 12:20 pm Click here to edit this post

Interesting Dee. This show is not popular enough for any press to follow them around so we may not even know who keeps in touch with who.

Explains why Eddie is so blind to George. It has been a mystery as to why Eddie isn't annoyed by this obnoxious man.

Scoobettenq

Wednesday, September 06, 2000 - 10:03 am Click here to edit this post

Now that it's been upped from 10k to a rumored 50k, any of them could walk except Eddie and probably Cass.

Ccc

Wednesday, September 06, 2000 - 05:38 pm Click here to edit this post

Scoob - Jamie CAN'T be banished now. Now what??

Scoobettenq

Wednesday, September 06, 2000 - 05:43 pm Click here to edit this post

Don't have a clue, looks like mom was off this time. Oh well.

I'm really, really sad that those 3 are nominated and one has to leave. :( :(

Gomer

Wednesday, September 06, 2000 - 05:45 pm Click here to edit this post

So much for the stars-back to the ol'dartboard

As pappy said-even a blind squirrel turns up an acorn now and then :) :)

Ccc

Thursday, September 07, 2000 - 12:18 am Click here to edit this post

I'm not sure we're back to the old dartboard just yet.

Scoob - did your mother work out the nominations first? If not, then free will of nominations (ie unknown nominations) will skew whoever's stars say it's time - cause they're immune.

I suspect she's done with all this - BUT IF NOT - would she consider doing this week's banishment based on who's nominated? She DID get it right on last time and I still have faith in astrology.

I thought I'd asked you if she worked out the nominations first (very important), but I can't find the post - so I must have dreamed it. Seems like you'd have to use the nomination dates to even determine who COULD be banished and work from there. DAMN, I wish I could do this. Zelda, am I right on this assumption?

Worst case - we could always fall back on Jayavy's prediction by signs - would either be George or Cass - so it would have to be Cass !!
I just don't like his method because it looks like Jamie would win the whole thing.

Fruitbat

Thursday, September 07, 2000 - 05:43 am Click here to edit this post

Ccc...I think she said she looked at all charts and did not try and figure out the nominations. Makes sense too. It is a minor thing, really. A chart couldn't really show something that insignifigant. They are all taking the nominations pretty much in stride.

I am very interested to see what she has to say about Curtis, Cass and Eddie.

I think it is safe to assume that if Jamie had been nominated she would have been out. No question about that. Just so happens she ducked that bullet but got another one instead. Something is probably up with her and the Brit incident. Her behavior this week may get her nominated next time.

OK Mom, we are very greatful and anxiously await the next installment. Please. We love this.

Astrology cannot tell the future, but it can show where there is possibility for strife, struggle, smooth sailing, etc. I am convinced whatever Jamie has going on in her chart will show up in another way on banishment day. Something will be evident and we are already seeing her escalating toward it. Her grip is loosening.

Geistlich

Thursday, September 07, 2000 - 08:04 am Click here to edit this post

On a slight tangent, if you do the chart for the first show, you can see that the Moon just finished squaring Pluto which isn't the best possible thing for mass public appeal. Also the very obvious Mercury retrograde which promises all sorts of confusion, failure and mangled communications.

I used July 5th, 6pm PDT, Los Angeles. It came on at 9pm eastern that first night, right after Survivor, correct?

Scoobettenq

Thursday, September 07, 2000 - 09:48 am Click here to edit this post

Ccc, thanks... that's true, I had posted that on another board last night. The free will of the nominations overruled the banishments - and if they were all nominated I believe that Jamie would have gone this time for sure. Brit sealed Jamie's fate tonight, if it wasn't already.

She didn't focus on the nominations, just on the banishments because being nominated is too hard to predict - it has a big effect on some (like George and Brit) but has little or no effect on others (like Curtis and Cass). So who knows.

I'll ask her if she'd be willing to decide out of the charts of people nominated this time, who she thinks will be banished.

BTW in defense of my mom, I didn't appreciate the blind squirrel turning up an acorn comment. Predictive astrology is VERY hard to do - and it's not something she usually does in readings, trying to predict and time exact events to the day and hour. So she was nice enough to take the time to do this as a hobby, and I stand by what I said before and know for a fact - my mom's a damn good astrologer. You couldn't find better. So there. :)

Spright

Thursday, September 07, 2000 - 10:21 am Click here to edit this post

Scoob, I hope your mother is not offended by anything she read here (I haven't read all the postings) and I hope she tries again! I found it all very entertaining and I appreciate all the work that went into it.

Chixdigeddie

Thursday, September 07, 2000 - 10:34 am Click here to edit this post

astrology = bunch of BS

no offense but come on get real...even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while

Fruitbat

Thursday, September 07, 2000 - 10:40 am Click here to edit this post

Scoo....there are plenty of us who understand how astrology works and we would be greatful to see what is happening in the charts of those nominated. Just ignore the other comments.

Jayavy

Thursday, September 07, 2000 - 10:41 am Click here to edit this post

Ccc said, "Worst case - we could always fall back on Jayavy's prediction by signs - would either be George or Cass - so it would have to be Cass !! I just don't like his method because it looks like Jamie would win the whole thing."
--------------------------------------------

Please, Ccc, this "order of sun signs" was just my observation of what has happened, not my prediction or my method. However, if this order continues--Leos (Will and Jordan), Virgos (Karen and Brittany)--then the Libras would be next: Cassandra would go this time and George next.

Personally, Curtis is my favorite house guest, so I hope for his sake this sun sign order does not continue.

Scoobettenq

Thursday, September 07, 2000 - 10:46 am Click here to edit this post

Spright, she's not offended by the comments because I choose not to read the rude ones to her. It's comments like the ones from "Chixdigeddie" that I wouldn't bother to share. It's easy for people to trash what they don't understand and aren't smart enough to figure out. Even the insult wasn't original.

My mom is turning 70 in a week and doesn't look a day over 50... she works full time, has studied astrology for 25+ years and does readings on her days off. She was offered the position of president of the WSAA (Wa State Astrological Association) several years ago and turned it down because she simply didn't have the time.

So I doubt she would really be hurt by ignorant comments on a Big Brother messageboard...lol But it hurts me though. Because after all, that is my mom, you know? And I put her words out here. So I am protective. That's all.