Author |
Message |
Ericzj
| Thursday, December 04, 2003 - 11:12 am
Is is a cool concept of seeing the celebs play cards. I much prefer the conversations on Dinner for 5 on IFC. Looks to me they are trying to copy that program with a poker slant instead of food. I wonder if Jon Favreu plays poker?
|
Ketchuplover
| Thursday, December 04, 2003 - 8:08 pm
I don't have cable. However,I believe I'm safe in saying that next week's players will WEST WING IT.
|
Sherrie
| Thursday, December 04, 2003 - 8:53 pm
I want to play! Q1. Who is eliminated first? Timothy Busfield Q2. Who is eliminated second? John Spencer Q3. Who is eliminated third? Richard Schiff Q4. Who is the runner up (4th)? Martin Sheen Q5. Who wins tonight? Alison Janney Q6. Who goes all in first? Timothy Busfield Q7. How many all in(s) will we see? 7 Ketchuplover - That was very funny!
|
Tess
| Friday, December 05, 2003 - 3:08 am
Q1. Who is eliminated first? Martin Sheen Q2. Who is eliminated second? Timothy Busfield Q3. Who is eliminated third? Allison Janney Q4. Who is the runner up (4th)? John Spencer Q5. Who wins tonight? Richard Schiff Q6. Who goes all in first? Timothy Busfield Q7. How many all in(s) will we see? 6
|
Konamouse
| Friday, December 05, 2003 - 9:26 am
This is not gonna be easy (more like luck of the draw - sort of like hoping for a good flop). Q1. Who is eliminated first? Timothy Busfield Q2. Who is eliminated second? John Spencer Q3. Who is eliminated third? Richard Schiff Q4. Who is the runner up (4th)? Martin Sheen Q5. Who wins tonight? Allison Janney Q6. Who goes all in first? Timothy Busfield Q7. How many all in(s) will we see? 5 'squeek'
|
Puttergirl
| Friday, December 05, 2003 - 5:42 pm
I'm changing my all ins to 7
|
Ketchuplover
| Friday, December 05, 2003 - 10:20 pm
Sherrie-will you marry me?
|
Sherrie
| Saturday, December 06, 2003 - 8:49 am
Ketchuplover - LOL! I knew if I waited long enough someone would ask!
|
Ginger1218
| Saturday, December 06, 2003 - 12:39 pm
Q1. Who is eliminated first? … Timothy Busfield Q2. Who is eliminated second? … Martin Sheen Q3. Who is eliminated third? … Richard Schiff Q4. Who is the runner up (4th)? … John Spencer Q5. Who wins tonight? … Allison Janney Q6. Who goes all in first? … Martin Sheen Q7. How many all in(s) will we see? …6
|
Puttergirl
| Saturday, December 06, 2003 - 4:45 pm
Caroline, Reiki, and Kady, I increased your all ins by 4 to account for the 4 automatic ones. If you want it changed, let me know before the next one airs.
|
Kady
| Saturday, December 06, 2003 - 5:12 pm
Thanks...I didn't know there were automatic ones. Just shows ya I know nothing about poker. I just like playing games with you.
|
Azlen
| Sunday, December 07, 2003 - 10:50 am
I wouldn't call them automatic considering the player still has to make the decision on whether they will do it or not. The word I would use would be "guaranteed".
|
Puttergirl
| Sunday, December 07, 2003 - 4:11 pm
What I meant is that there will automatically be 4 per show, so each person's picks needs to include those 4 plus however many they think will happen.
|
Pamy
| Sunday, December 07, 2003 - 4:29 pm
Q1. Who is eliminated first? Martin Sheen Q2. Who is eliminated second? Timothy Busfield Q3. Who is eliminated third? Allison Janney Q4. Who is the runner up (4th)? John Spencer Q5. Who wins tonight? Richard Schiff Q6. Who goes all in first? Timothy Busfield Q7. How many all in(s) will we see? 7
|
Maris
| Sunday, December 07, 2003 - 4:36 pm
Q1. Who is eliminated first? John Spencer Q2. Who is eliminated second? Allison Janney Q3. Who is eliminated third? Martin Sheen Q4. Who is the runner up (4th)? Timothy Busfield Q5. Who wins tonight? Richard Schiff Q6. Who goes all in first? Martin Sheen Q7. How many all in(s) will we see? 8
|
Bob2112
| Tuesday, December 09, 2003 - 4:01 pm
Q1. Who is eliminated first? Allison Janney Q2. Who is eliminated second? Martin Sheen Q3. Who is eliminated third? Richard Schiff Q4. Who is the runner up (4th)? Timothy Busfield Q5. Who wins tonight? John Spencer Q6. Who goes all in first? Allison Janney Q7. How many all in(s) will we see? 6
|
Bob2112
| Tuesday, December 09, 2003 - 4:06 pm
Questions about the "All In". Sometimes a person with more chips says they are "All In", but it is really the other person (with less chips) that is "All In". If this happens for Question 6, is the correct answer the person who has less chips and is actually "All In" or is it the person who says it but is actually not "All In"? And for question 7, are you only counting "All In" bets that are matched by another better or are you also counting them if all other players fold? Thanks.
|
Azlen
| Tuesday, December 09, 2003 - 4:27 pm
Here is my understanding, though Puttergirl can clarify for the sake of the game. In your first example, both would be considered "all in" even if the pot was reduced because the person who called the bet had fewer chips because the initial bet was an "all in". If everyone else folds it still counts as an "all in" because the bet was still made. The only time I wouldn't count an "all in" is when someone on a short stack goes "all in" first and someone with more chips calls them. In that case the first bet would be an "all in" where the second bet wouldn't be. Unless of course they raised the bet and went "all in" themselves.
|
Puttergirl
| Tuesday, December 09, 2003 - 6:01 pm
ANSWERS to Bob2112 questions: Whoever begins the "all in" will be counted as the one who initiated it for the sake of the 7th question. I'm going to define "all in" as someone pushing all their chips in and stating they are "all in", regarDless of their chip count. It also won't matter who has the most chips- him/her or others at the table who call. An "all in" is NOT: someone calling a bet with all of their chips. It has to be the first bet or a raise, NOT A CALL! For the other question, when an "all in" is initiated, again by whoever begins it regardless of chip count, that "all in" will count as only one. It won't matter how many others go "all in" with him/her. Does this answer it sufficiently?
|
Puttergirl
| Tuesday, December 09, 2003 - 6:10 pm
We have 13 players in the POLL now!!! Funny- we unanimously don't like Timothy Busfield's chances- lol!!!
|
Bob2112
| Tuesday, December 09, 2003 - 7:07 pm
Lucky 13! Cool! Answers look good to me. Any answer is good. I just wanted to cover them before the show and not after, since it could makes sense to count them several ways.
|
Azlen
| Tuesday, December 09, 2003 - 7:21 pm
The answer is good, but that means that there are no longer four guaranteed all ins and technically there could be none. So I am going to drop my guess to 5.
|
Puttergirl
| Tuesday, December 09, 2003 - 7:25 pm
I was thinking about how it went last week. There were alot of "all ins" and they all fell within my definition above. The only person I remember going out on a call was Emily Proctor.
|
Puttergirl
| Tuesday, December 09, 2003 - 7:31 pm
Oops, I've got John Spencer to win and he started like an idiot!!!!! Please, let me in a game with these people- they stink!!!! I can't believe nobody tried to take the second pot!!!
|
Azlen
| Tuesday, December 09, 2003 - 7:38 pm
It's a loose-passive table, very easy table to make money on.
|