Author |
Message |
Jimmer
Moderator
08-30-2000
| Friday, August 14, 2009 - 6:30 pm
Divorce is not easy.
|
Texannie
Member
07-16-2001
| Friday, August 14, 2009 - 6:47 pm
Hailey Glassman Speaks: "I'm Not Some Fame wh*re" Today 5:20 PM PDT by Gina Serpe Jon Gosselin spoke out. Kate Gosselin just made the media rounds. The other other woman even briefly held the media spotlight. Now it's Hailey Glassman's turn. The 22-year-old sat down exclusively with E! News on Friday, dishing on the Plus 8 parents, how her relationship with Jon is holding up in the wake of intense scrutiny and, yes, how she feels about Kate 2.0. "I'm not some fame wh*re," Glassman said to her detractors. "Take my 15 minutes, you can have it back. Please take it back!" Glassman was quick to dispel speculation that her relationship with Jon, unexpected as it was, played any part in the Gosselins' split. "Jon and Kate have moved on with their lives—it's only the viewers who haven't moved on," she said. As for how the rabid interest in her and Jon's personal lives has affected the budding paramours... Glassman, who calls Gosselin her "first love," began their friendship in May—months after Jon and Kate separated—while Gosselin was staying at her parents' house. Although it began innocently, it quickly blossomed into something more. "He was living in my house, the person I joked around with. He was sad and bored, I was home and bored." Glassman, who said her biggest fights with Jon stem from the public scrutiny, also had some fighting words for would-be love rival, all-too-roving reporter Kate Major. "I wasn't worried," Glassman says, adding that Jon and Kate 2.0 were never romantic together. "I know what Jon tells me and I know him...but she's cuckoo, cuckoo, you know?" As for why she has chosen to speak out now... "I want people to know the truth. Right now I'm speaking from my heart, myself. I'm not some celebrity, I'm not some famous person—I'm just a 22-year-old girl who got caught in the middle of all this." (Originally published on August 14, 2009 at 3:15 p.m. PT) ________ That's not all Hailey had to say. Be sure to watch her first-ever TV interview in its entirety on E! News this Monday at 7 and 10 p.m. from enewsonline.com
|
Julieboo
Member
02-05-2002
| Friday, August 14, 2009 - 6:50 pm
"Jon and Kate have moved on with their lives—it's only the viewers who haven't moved on," she said. Spot on for sure!!
|
Texannie
Member
07-16-2001
| Friday, August 14, 2009 - 6:50 pm
Glassman, who calls Gosselin her "first love," began their friendship in May—months after Jon and Kate separated—while Gosselin was staying at her parents' house. Although it began innocently, it quickly blossomed into something more. "He was living in my house, the person I joked around with. He was sad and bored, I was home and bored." the basis for every good relationship.....
|
Julieboo
Member
02-05-2002
| Friday, August 14, 2009 - 6:56 pm
So Jon went to the Glassman's after he left Kate? Weird, huh?
|
Naja
Member
06-28-2003
| Friday, August 14, 2009 - 8:14 pm
Scroll down to the second video on this page and it has the second half of the interview at the fence with Jon that TMZ didn't show. The one at the top is the same one shown on the TMZ page posted earlier. http://tinyurl.com/lk6eqc It's a link to people magazine site
|
Julieboo
Member
02-05-2002
| Friday, August 14, 2009 - 8:15 pm
Aww Naja, can ya give a synopsis? Cant get the link to work for me.
|
Naja
Member
06-28-2003
| Friday, August 14, 2009 - 8:16 pm
I fixed it Julieboo
|
Julieboo
Member
02-05-2002
| Friday, August 14, 2009 - 8:22 pm
Okay. So Kate was the one who called the police? Why? I mean did she not know that that might upset her kids? I mean I know there may be a lot we don't know, but come on, why would she take that chance? (of upsetting her kids)
|
Julieboo
Member
02-05-2002
| Friday, August 14, 2009 - 8:23 pm
Thanks for the links Naja.
|
Naja
Member
06-28-2003
| Friday, August 14, 2009 - 8:25 pm
You're welcome 
|
Brenda1966
Member
07-03-2002
| Friday, August 14, 2009 - 8:36 pm
I don't agree at all that Kate should be free to come and go during Jon's time at the house. If they are going to make this wacky set up work, she's going to have to learn to respect his time there with the kids without her interference and control. Interesting that Kate's the one that called the cops and they told her there's nothing they can do. The word tantrum comes to mind.
|
Jhezzie
Member
07-05-2001
| Friday, August 14, 2009 - 9:18 pm
"Jon and Kate have moved on with their lives—it's only the viewers who haven't moved on," she said. Should the viewers "move on" from their show that they won't let go?
|
Sabbatia
Member
08-15-2005
| Friday, August 14, 2009 - 11:45 pm
From what I understood, Jon had this babysitter coming over and Kate didn't approve, so she was going to take the sitter's place.....I could be wrong, that's just the way I read things. I know it wasn't her time to be there, but what I was reading sounded like she was going there to be the stand in sitter.
|
Roxip
Member
01-29-2004
| Saturday, August 15, 2009 - 12:04 am
That's how I read it too. I have a friend and her husband actually had it put in the divorce decree that if she is going to have a babysitter she has to call him and tell him and give him the first opportunity to "babysit."
|
Keldogg
Member
08-12-2005
| Saturday, August 15, 2009 - 1:34 am
The fact is that a 22 year old girl is giving an interview about her relationship with a still married man, to discuss the love triangle with another woman....this speaks volumes!
|
Texannie
Member
07-16-2001
| Saturday, August 15, 2009 - 6:53 am
that's how i read it too.
|
Julieboo
Member
02-05-2002
| Saturday, August 15, 2009 - 7:11 am
But even if Kate were going there to take the place of the babysitter, that is NOT her call. It is not her right. Like Jon said, "We're good judges of taking care of our kids and when we need babysitters, we need babysitters." Kate has no choice but to respect Jon's choices when it is "his turn." That's just how it is in a divorce. It may suck royally, but to make it as easy as possible for the kids, the parent who is upset just needs to suck it up and not do stuff like call the police. Now if Kate truly felt that the kids were in danger, that would indeed be a different story. But I am guessing child endangerment was never a real possibility. (Plus it sure seemed like Jon was home anyways...)
|
Texannie
Member
07-16-2001
| Saturday, August 15, 2009 - 7:47 am
I don't think not wanting your ex's latest sleepover partner to babysit is all that out of line. bottom line, we really don't know what happened. only what jon has told us. he certainly wouldn't say something that portrayed him badly. what's the old saying. there are 3 sides to every story..yours, mine and the truth.
|
Hukdonreality
Member
09-29-2003
| Saturday, August 15, 2009 - 7:51 am
Mr. "I hate the media" sure spends a lot of time down by that fence talking to them...
|
Cinnamongirl
Member
01-10-2001
| Saturday, August 15, 2009 - 8:16 am
Still, Us Weekly has reported he's been acting like a single man, and even had an overnighter with 22-year-old single mother Stephanie Santoro, one of his babysitters. Kate and Jon got into such a heated argument over Santoro at their $1.1 million Pennsylvania home Thursday night, police ordered her to leave the property. "Kate tried to 'cry it up' with the cops and it didn't work and they said, 'You have to leave,'" Jon said today. "I guess she didn't agree with my babysitting Yes Texannie, I don't think its out of line either. Its sad.. If he thinks Kate should respect his time then maybe he should respect the kids and not have his girlfriend/babysitter at the house. Its pretty gross. I wonder how other mothers in Kate position would have reacted... I doubt many would just sit back and say, well Its Jons time, he can do what he wants..
|
Julieboo
Member
02-05-2002
| Saturday, August 15, 2009 - 8:18 am
I don't think it's out of line either (assuming that is why Kate went there.) If it were me, I would be livid too. If (assuming again) that were the case, I can totally empathize. The difference for me is that I would have not called the police. I would be VERY UPSET if my soon to be ex were having a babysitter sleep over--if I thought she'd be sleeping with my ex, with the kids seeing that happen. The difference is that I would think ahead and realize that the police getting involved may freak the kids out way more than just letting this go the one night and then talking to my lawyers the very next day. Kate seems to be in a very hard place. It does seem like Jon is sewing his oats right in front of his kids, with multiple women. So that has got to really be beyond hard for Kate (on so many levels, personally plus as a protector of her kids). So I do feel for her. I just think it was a bad idea on her part to call the police.
|
Cinnamongirl
Member
01-10-2001
| Saturday, August 15, 2009 - 8:35 am
I have to agree Julie, it was a bit extreme...
|
Texannie
Member
07-16-2001
| Saturday, August 15, 2009 - 8:38 am
we don't know why she called the police, only what jon said. all this reminds me of a friend of mine whose husband had an affair and they divorced. her ex's dad had been a 'serial marrier' and her biggest fear was her ex doing the same thing. she said 'i know what seeing his dad with a constant parade of women did to ex, i don't want my kids having those same scars'. (thankfully for her kids, the ex ended up staying with the mistress and having a long marriage) but i worry about the kids. it seems like jon could keep the ladies to a minimum on his turns till at least the divorce is final and the children have a chance to sort of get used to the new arrangements.
|
Jimmer
Moderator
08-30-2000
| Saturday, August 15, 2009 - 9:04 am
Jon is making some choices in his personal life that I disagree with (and obviously Kate disagrees with) but the bottom line is that they have an agreement and Kate can't just barge in whenever she feels like it regardless of how upset she may be. If you weren't on good terms, imagine how you would feel if your ex just barged in anytime he or she felt like it?
|