TVCH FORUMS HOME . JOIN . FAN CLUBS . DONATE . CONTACT . CHAT  
                  Quick Links   TOPICS . TREE-VIEW . SEARCH . HELP! . NEWS . PROFILE
Archive through April 29, 2010

Reality TVClubHouse Discussions: General Discussions ARCHIVES: January 2010 ~ April 2010: The Entertainment Place: Hollywood gossip, news & milestones: Archive through April 29, 2010 users admin

Author Message
Nyheat
Member

08-09-2006

Sunday, April 25, 2010 - 5:25 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Nyheat a private message Print Post    
You probably know his songs with the band Poison from the 80s--"Every Rose Has Its Thorn" "Talk Dirty to Me," etc. My sister and I went to an autograph signing way back then at a local record store. They had to go before we could get to them; when they passed thru the crowd all you could see of CC Deville was his teased blonde hair he was so short (lol).

Brain injuries are always so difficult to hear about. The prognosis is always bad it seems. I really hope Bret is ok.

Mameblanche
Member

08-24-2002

Monday, April 26, 2010 - 8:17 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Mameblanche a private message Print Post    
Here's the link to Bret Michaels' official website with updated info:

http://www.bretmichaels.com/

Warning: It's VERY slow to load.

Cwcoop
Member

04-19-2008

Monday, April 26, 2010 - 4:48 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Cwcoop a private message Print Post    
I had forgotten about this until my DH reminded me.
At the Tony award show last year, June of '09, Brett was hit in the head with a prop that fell on him.
Here is a link from the thread - there was more discussion about it there too.


http://www.eonline.com ....

The most recent blame for his current condition is his recent emergency surgery for appendicitis (sp?), but I wonder, just wonder, if that incident at the Tony's had anything to do w/ this brain hemorrage.

Pamy
Member

01-02-2002

Monday, April 26, 2010 - 6:17 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Pamy a private message Print Post    
oh wow never thought of that...I hope the docs are as smart as you and are cking into that

Prisonerno6
Member

08-31-2002

Tuesday, April 27, 2010 - 5:42 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Prisonerno6 a private message Print Post    
In one of the articles posted here I read that doctors already considered that. Since that injury took place several months ago, any damage caused by it would have shown up already. They also ruled out any involvement with his appendectomy and his diabetes.

http://www.people.com/...

This article suggests it was an aneurysm, which is something you're born with.

I'm sure the doctors are checking into everything, even those things us with no medical training would have no clue about.

Cinnamongirl
Member

01-10-2001

Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - 6:56 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Cinnamongirl a private message Print Post    
Sandra adopts a baby & divorces Jesse. People Magazine

In public, Sandra Bullock has been through the best and worst of times this year – from winning her first Oscar to enduring the breakup of her marriage. In private, she was quietly keeping a joyful secret – his name is Louis, and he is her newborn son.

"He's just perfect, I can't even describe him any other way," Bullock reveals exclusively in the new issue of PEOPLE, announcing that she is the proud mother of Louis Bardo Bullock, a 3½-month-old boy, born in New Orleans. "It's like he's always been a part of our lives."

Bullock, 45, and husband Jesse James, 41, began the adoption process four years ago and brought Louis home in January but decided to keep the news to themselves until after the Oscars. Their close friends and family – including James's children Sunny, 6, Jesse Jr., 12, and Chandler, 15 – were essential in keeping the adoption a secret.

Then, just 10 days after the March 7 Oscars, Bullock and James separated following reports James had cheated. Bullock says she is now finalizing the adoption as a single parent.

Cinnamongirl
Member

01-10-2001

Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - 7:01 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Cinnamongirl a private message Print Post    
Is it April Fools? Is this for real? They were waiting til after the Oscars to reveal a new baby and then all hell breaks loose. How crushing. But I guess now she has a different focus to keep her going forward. Good for her

Goddessatlaw
Member

07-19-2002

Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - 8:02 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Goddessatlaw a private message Print Post    
Slow clap. Standing O. Good for you! Lady!

Bullock is made of awesome. Apparently the press thinks so, too, because there is NO WAY they didn't at least know something of this and chose too keep it under hat until she was ready to face the public again. There wasn't even a sniff of a rumor in the press. Well done.

Jimmer
Moderator

08-30-2000

Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - 8:12 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Jimmer a private message Print Post    
I think this is a good example of how the press treats celebrities that they like and celebrities that they genuinely feel deserving of privacy. On the other hand, I suspect that some other celebrities deliberately flaunt themselves to the press and then whine about excessive negative coverage.

Happymom
Member

01-20-2003

Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - 8:29 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Happymom a private message Print Post    
wow! :-)

Kookliebird
Member

08-04-2005

Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - 8:30 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Kookliebird a private message Print Post    
Good for her. Forget about Jesse. That's the past. Live your life. You have a more important little person that needs you. Congrats!

Brenda1966
Member

07-03-2002

Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - 8:57 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Brenda1966 a private message Print Post    
Congrats to Sandra and her baby! Yes, very curious that there was no leaking or rumor of this adoption that took years to come together.

Seamonkey
Moderator

09-07-2000

Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - 12:00 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Seamonkey a private message Print Post    
What a shame that it is up to the hounds of hell that mostly make up the press today to deem one person worthy of respect and privacy and others aren't allowed to go anywhere in a non-flashy manner just to get in a car or buy a loaf of bread.

And of course the average Jane might not have been able to complete the adoption as single but clearly Sandra has the means and the heart to support a child on her own.. the child has just lost a potential family (but the potential daddy.. probably best lost anyway).

And yes.. scoop up that baby and run, Sandra, run.

Friend
Member

05-21-2008

Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - 12:32 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Friend a private message Print Post    
Edited: Was trying to link to People where there is a picture of the new little cutie but can't seem to pull it off so here's the whole thing, hopefully it will work.

People

Texannie
Member

07-16-2001

Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - 12:55 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Texannie a private message Print Post    
Bullock told PEOPLE she didn't want the baby pulled into “the awards season energy” and after she brought him home she kept virtually all visitors out of her home, including stylists and make-up artists working with her for the awards.

“I did not want him brought into a world that would not have been too sincere to him as I wanted,” Bullock told PEOPLE. “I wanted to be alone with him as long as I could then we had to tell his story




Read more: http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/36813942/ns/today-entertainment
/#ixzz0mQVUKZvV


Brenda1966
Member

07-03-2002

Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - 2:29 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Brenda1966 a private message Print Post    
The sight of that picture with her baby just made me cry.

It really goes beyond means as to why single women have a harder time adopting (which is not to discount the huge expense adoption can be). Some agencies and international countries just flat out won't work with a single woman.

Grooch
Member

06-16-2006

Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - 2:45 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Grooch a private message Print Post    
Well, there is that woman that just sent her adopted son alone back to Russia because she didn't want him any more.

Brenda1966
Member

07-03-2002

Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - 3:34 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Brenda1966 a private message Print Post    
I think goes a bit beyond simplifying it. She made a very big mistake, but she was sent a child with severe problems. To say she didn't want him anymore doesn't even begin to dig into the real problems of attachment disorder, fetal alcohol syndrome etc.

Seamonkey
Moderator

09-07-2000

Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - 9:39 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Seamonkey a private message Print Post    
Well, Sandra's baby is totally adorable and while of course the reason for the breakup had to be devastating but that little guy will be keeping her quite busy, in a happy way.

Hermione69
Member

07-23-2002

Thursday, April 29, 2010 - 8:51 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Hermione69 a private message Print Post    
Sooo... Julia Roberts has the 4th cover for People's annual Most Beautiful issue. Is she deserving or not?

Hukdonreality
Member

09-29-2003

Thursday, April 29, 2010 - 9:10 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Hukdonreality a private message Print Post    
In my mind, yes. I love all Julia Roberts movies!

Nyheat
Member

08-09-2006

Thursday, April 29, 2010 - 9:34 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Nyheat a private message Print Post    
No. The Most Beautiful picks are always stale as hell, like George Clooney 50 years in a row. Fresh meat, please.

Very tired and cranky today so it's all gonna be like that folks!

Hukdonreality
Member

09-29-2003

Thursday, April 29, 2010 - 9:36 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Hukdonreality a private message Print Post    
Would you prefer Lady Goo Goo?

Hermione69
Member

07-23-2002

Thursday, April 29, 2010 - 9:38 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Hermione69 a private message Print Post    
I'm gonna try to turn this into a poll question. No pressure, Heyitslori!

I'm not a huge Julia fan and I've heard she is really snooty, but she is very pretty.

Cinnamongirl
Member

01-10-2001

Thursday, April 29, 2010 - 9:44 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Cinnamongirl a private message Print Post    
Sure, she's pretty... But she'll always be a husband stealer to me and thats so not beautiful. I'd rather see someone else on the cover (and NO, not Angelina!! LOL)