TVCH FORUMS HOME . JOIN . FAN CLUBS . DONATE . CONTACT . CHAT  
                  Quick Links   TOPICS . TREE-VIEW . SEARCH . HELP! . NEWS . PROFILE
Archive through April 11, 2008

Reality TVClubHouse Discussions: General Discussions ARCHIVES: Apr. 2008 ~ June 2008: The Entertainment Place : Celebrity Buzz : Hollywood gossip, news & milestones : Archive through April 11, 2008 users admin

Author Message
Holly
Member

06-19-2005

Monday, April 07, 2008 - 8:27 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Holly a private message Print Post    
<Ok Gloria Swanson scares me.>

Gypsy Rose Lee's eyebrows scare me!

Goddessatlaw
Member

07-19-2002

Monday, April 07, 2008 - 8:32 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Goddessatlaw a private message Print Post    
Veronica Lake looks like she has a Swiss-Miss reject thing going on there, Greta Garbo was really rocking the fug before her makeover (whomever saw the glamorous movie star under that was truly gifted), but it appears Grace Kelly and Ingrid Bergman were never NOT gorgeous.

Ladytex
Member

09-27-2001

Monday, April 07, 2008 - 10:11 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Ladytex a private message Print Post    
X17 very quietly Apologizes to Eva Longoria and Tony Parker for Lies about His Supposed Affair

I hope they get sued out of existence. If there was a lawsuit induced apology, it should have been on the same page that they posted their lies.

Goddessatlaw
Member

07-19-2002

Monday, April 07, 2008 - 12:09 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Goddessatlaw a private message Print Post    
That was so wrong. Eva made Tony follow her around for days carrying her oversized gold gucci bag, and he did it to try to get out of the dog house. Tony should get an extra monetary award for the doing time in the doghouse humiliation factor.

Seriously, that had to be hard on a young marriage.

Eeyoreslament
Member

07-20-2003

Monday, April 07, 2008 - 1:58 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Eeyoreslament a private message Print Post    
Agreed Ladytex. These gossip people are WAAAY too capricious with the stories they run, and that can shatter trust in a marriage despite the brave face they may put on. Waiting several months with that shadow of doubt can't be good for any marriage.

Seamonkey
Moderator

09-07-2000

Monday, April 07, 2008 - 3:11 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Seamonkey a private message Print Post    
Agree, too.. quiet apology, simply inadequate.

Urgrace
Member

08-19-2000

Monday, April 07, 2008 - 7:09 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Urgrace a private message Print Post    
GAL said That before photograph of Marilyn Monroe looks surprisingly like Britney Spears after she buzzed her head.

When any girl pulls all of her hair straight back into a ponytail, it takes away the softness of her face. They must have tried to find the worst picture of Marilyn possible! I did notice they tried to match hairstyles of most, but Veronica Lake didn't wear her hair like that after picture. She had the famous "peek-a-boo" bleached blonde style. Grace Kelly and Ingrid Bergman were "Helen of Troy" eternal goddesses. ETA Clara Bow looked better before they messed with her! LOL

Urgrace
Member

08-19-2000

Monday, April 07, 2008 - 7:13 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Urgrace a private message Print Post    
Lies in the media don't make all of us believe their tripe. Glad they had to publish an apology, and glad some people got to read it before it went into oblivion. Eva and Tony rock!

Nyheat
Member

08-09-2006

Monday, April 07, 2008 - 7:18 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Nyheat a private message Print Post    
Loved Clara Bow's before pic--love the Gibson Girl look. Love Audrey, eternally. A lot of good bone structure that someone thankfully noticed way back when. Liked Ingrid too--always a beauty.

Thanks GAL--very entertaining!

Beekindpleez
Member

07-18-2006

Tuesday, April 08, 2008 - 9:48 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Beekindpleez a private message Print Post    
I heard a little blurb about Kathleen Turner losing a lawsuit to Nicholas Cage, but didn't hear the whole story.
Does anybody know anything about this?

Maris
Member

03-28-2002

Tuesday, April 08, 2008 - 9:58 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Maris a private message Print Post    
THis is what Ms. Turner wrote in a book and he wasnt happy:

He caused so many problems. He was arrested twice for drunk-driving and, I think, once for stealing a dog. He'd come across a chihuahua he liked and stuck it in his jacket.

On the last night of filming, he came into my trailer after he'd clearly been drinking heavily. He fell on his knees and asked if I could ever forgive him. I said, "Not right now. I have a scene to shoot. Excuse me," and just walked out.

Nicolas didn't manage to kill the film, but he didn't add a lot to it, either. For years, whenever I saw him, he'd apologise for his behaviour. I'd say: "Look, I'm way over it." But I haven't pursued the idea of working with him again.

link

Apparently it was all a lie

Beekindpleez
Member

07-18-2006

Tuesday, April 08, 2008 - 9:59 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Beekindpleez a private message Print Post    
Maris...thank you very much! I really appreciate it.

Escapee
Member

06-15-2004

Tuesday, April 08, 2008 - 10:02 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Escapee a private message Print Post    
Yeah, I am sure you could look up his past DUI's right? Isn't Miss Turner quite the imbiber herself?

Jasper
Moderator

09-14-2000

Tuesday, April 08, 2008 - 6:27 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Jasper a private message Print Post    
I read a blurb from her book and I think she talked about how much she drink to kill the pain, I think she has rheumatiod arthritis. I imagine that is why she looks bloated at times from the medication.

Scotchbright
Member

10-05-2006

Wednesday, April 09, 2008 - 8:27 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Scotchbright a private message Print Post    
From EOnline, April 8, 2008

Swayze Thanks Fans for "Good Thoughts"
Patrick Swayze—and, even more importantly, his doctor—continues to look on the bright side.

In a statement released Tuesday, the actor and his wife thanked fans for their ongoing support as he undergoes treatment for pancreatic cancer.

"We're thrilled and grateful for the positive response Patrick has shown towards his treatment," Swayze and Lisa Niemi, who's been married to the Dirty Dancing star for 32 years, said in a statement to People.

"Also, we can't help but feel that all the prayers, meditations and good thoughts sent his way by everyone has made a difference. Thank you!"

Word got out about a month ago that the 55-year-old actor and classically trained dancer was seriously ill, but both Swayze's family and his doctor were quick to refute reports that his condition was hopeless.

"Patrick Swayze continues to respond well to his treatment for pancreatic cancer," his personal physician, Dr. George Fisher, said Tuesday. "Because of his excellent response, he will continue the same therapy at Stanford [University Medical Center]."


I hope he continues to do well.

Herckleperckle
Member

11-20-2003

Thursday, April 10, 2008 - 10:29 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Herckleperckle a private message Print Post    
Getting Married: Johnny Depp and Vanessa Paradis on June 14, 2008

jdvm

April 10, 2008 06:37:39 GMT
by Staff Writer
Johnny Depp, Vanessa Paradis
© Lee Roth / RothStock/PR Photos



Added fuel to the previously existent wedding talk, Johnny Depp is said to have been planning to wed Vanessa Paradis on June 14 later this year. The pair, who have been together for ten years and already had two children together, have always insisted they don't feel the need to make their relationship official, but French singer Vanessa is now keen to walk down the aisle.

Vanessa recently told Johnny she'd like to get married, a source close to the Paradis-Depp family has stated. And Johnny, being the amazing man he is, is willing to make it happen. "Johnny loves Vanessa very much, and he said if that's what would make her happy, then he'd marry her," the source added.

The wedding reportedly will likely take place in Georgia's Tybee Island since "They wanted to make it convenient for Johnny's family in Florida." Depp and Vanessa's children, Lily-Rose and Jack meanwhile "are really excited about it. Actually the whole family is excited," the source went on saying.

Invitations, still according to the same source, will be sent out in a few weeks.

Depp who previously was married to makeup artist Lori Anne Allison in the 80s, has previously said of his relationship with Vanessa, "For all intents and purposes, we are married," adding that, "if [Vanessa] ever said, 'Hey, let's get hitched,' I would do it in a second."

No official verification nor denial issued by the couple and their camps just yet.

Herckleperckle
Member

11-20-2003

Thursday, April 10, 2008 - 11:29 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Herckleperckle a private message Print Post    
Joker Scene Cut Off From 'Dark Knight'?

heath ledger

April 11, 2008 02:20:03 GMT

Though it was said earlier that the sudden death of actor Heath Ledger would not affect his upcoming feature film projects, the latest rumor apparently shows the opposite. According to CinemaBlend, the 28-year-old actor's highly anticipated film "The Dark Knight" allegedly will have one of the Joker's scene cut off due to his tragic passing.

Reporting on the speculation, the site noted their source has revealed that one particular Joker scene in which Ledger's villainous character is captured on camera pretending to be dead and put in a body bag won't be included in the Warner Bros. Pictures' film. Further, the site explained that the film's executives are considering to lay aside the specific scene after many test audience gave out discouraging reactions towards it.
...


Well, geesh, they couldn't have figured that one out without test audiences?

Mocha
Member

08-12-2001

Friday, April 11, 2008 - 5:47 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Mocha a private message Print Post    
Eh I think they should keep that scene. It's a movie and could be pertinent to the story.

Jimmer
Moderator

08-30-2000

Friday, April 11, 2008 - 6:28 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Jimmer a private message Print Post    
I can see them cutting it if it makes the audience uncomfortable. After all a good part of Hollywood is about making money.

I personally don't see why it should be uncomfortable though. They are showing a film and it is acting and it is his work.

Kitt
Member

09-06-2000

Friday, April 11, 2008 - 9:10 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Kitt a private message Print Post    
I think it would make me uncomfortable. You don't want to risk taking your audience out of the movie and into real life thoughts, and that would do it for me. I'm sure they can edit back in any pertinent story.

Nyheat
Member

08-09-2006

Friday, April 11, 2008 - 9:27 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Nyheat a private message Print Post    
I bet that on the eventual extended version DVD, the scene will be included in the extra features or in the director's cut. It sounds like the film is pretty dark already--if the scene wasn't integral to plot, I can see why they would want to remove it.

Tvfreak
Member

04-09-2008

Friday, April 11, 2008 - 9:31 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Tvfreak a private message Print Post    
I work in marketing/PR, and I was actually anticipating an issue of this nature to come up. I think if the scene can be edited out without affecting your plot, then it should be done. This will a) show respect to the family and b) make sure that your audience feels comfortable. IMO, if the film's message is compromised by taking steps to make your audience feel more comfortable, what message were you going for in the first place? And are we sure that's the right message?

Grooch
Member

06-16-2006

Friday, April 11, 2008 - 9:53 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Grooch a private message Print Post    
Personally, I would want it removed as a viewer.

If I did go to see the movie, once I got over my discomfort about the fact that he has passed away (and partly because of this movie) and I become absorbed in it, I know that seeing a scene of him being put in a body bag would jolt me out of the fantasy world a movie puts a person in and just totally creep me out and make me feel depressed.

I don't need to waste money on something like that. And like NY said, it will be included on the dvd.

Herckleperckle
Member

11-20-2003

Friday, April 11, 2008 - 10:13 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Herckleperckle a private message Print Post    
Out of deference to his family, I think that was the proper decision. But I do see your point in your last sentence, Jimmer. Just would have been too hard for me to withstand if I were a loved one.

Grooch, I'm right there with you on this.

TVfreak, loved your comments, esp the last two sentences.

Eeyoreslament
Member

07-20-2003

Friday, April 11, 2008 - 10:29 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Eeyoreslament a private message Print Post    
As a viewer, I could see myself feeling a bit of discomfort at the scene. BUT, I can also believe that Heath Ledger probably wouldn't have wanted it cut out on the account of his death.