Author |
Message |
Wilsonatmd
Member
01-23-2001
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 2:48 pm
It's getting to the point where I'm really starting ot get worried for her personal safety....
|
Cinnamongirl
Member
01-10-2001
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 2:57 pm
It sure doesn't seem that long ago when I was happy for her to be out of that marriage to KFed, she looked great and she was with those two boys constantly...now the tables have turned and KFed is the good guy with the kids (and inlaws) and shes sinking fast. What a difference a year makes. I hope this snaps her out of her troubles, although I'm sure its much deeper than any of us realize
|
Supergranny
Member
02-03-2005
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 2:59 pm
I just wish I felt that Kevin wants the kids because he loves them. I have that nagging feeling that the child support has a lot to do with his working so hard to get them. He just asked for an extension on his alimony and it was denied...now he's taking the kids...hummmm And those boys are darling, they deserve loving home and parents and not be used as pawns. Oh well the lives of the rich and famous, I don't need to worry about those problems!
|
Mameblanche
Member
08-24-2002
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 3:51 pm
I don't seem to remember him fighting for custody of his other kids... hmmm But that Brit is definitely a parental disaster. If he's even got her parents behind him, then he's okay with me as the primary, custodial parent.
|
Escapee
Member
06-15-2004
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 4:04 pm
Maybe he's not worried about their safety with Shar Jackson, she seems pretty grounded, except for having 3 kids with K-Fed. My dad didn't fight for custody of my sister and I, but he did we my youngest 3 sibilings because the home they had with their mother was unstable and unsafe, and he knew that he could offer them better than what they had. He fought for child support from their mother, but did NOT get it. He got the kids anyway and said that's what was most important.
|
Seamonkey
Moderator
09-07-2000
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 4:04 pm
Bottom line, the kids seem safer with him right now.. The kids are pawns no matter where they are, unfortunately.
|
Mocha
Member
08-12-2001
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 4:09 pm
Probably cuz Shar was never flashing her or driving into parked cars or did 3 stints in rehab. And Shar has 2 kids with Kfed not 3.
|
Ahnicka
Member
08-08-2007
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 4:12 pm
Supergranny, I agree. I know Brit's a mess, but I hate that Kevin is getting the kids, because I believe he only wants them because of the child support he'll get for them. I hate that Brit is playing right into his <100> hands.
|
Twinkie
Member
09-24-2002
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 4:13 pm
I just saw on TV Brit driving her kids to turn them over to Kfed. What is she doing driving again with no license??
|
Escapee
Member
06-15-2004
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 4:16 pm
Yes, I meant two. So sorry. Does seem iffy that he asked for more alimony. I can see him getting child support, he will be supporting them and it's the right of the child to be supported by both parents.
|
Mocha
Member
08-12-2001
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 4:16 pm
Dang they filmed that?
|
Escapee
Member
06-15-2004
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 4:21 pm
I wonder if that's actual footage, because you'd think he'd get to go get them.
|
Goddessatlaw
Member
07-19-2002
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 4:22 pm
Ya, apparently she still doesn't have a Cali driver's license. And was driving the children around all weekend, at one point in the back of an open convertible IN their child safety seats but without being buckled. Oh, and the kids had no eye protection for the buffeting they'd take in the back of that car. Did I say it was in the back of an open convertible? I read somewhere else that she hadn't observed the court orders to take parenting classes weekly or her drug tests. She may have failed a drug test, who knows. The kids are better off with Federline. I'm glad she forked them over early. Now she can continue partying without worrying about pesky issues like whether the kids have been fed or are observing a healthy schedule or hate driving around in a car for hours and hours with cameras flashing in their faces.
|
Escapee
Member
06-15-2004
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 4:27 pm
Or worrying if their teeth have been brushed. I know that one's been bothering her.
|
Holly
Member
06-19-2005
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 8:33 pm
Has she been checked for post-partum depression? I just can't help but think that might be a very serious, underlying problem with her. I definitely think something beyond immaturity is wrong with the girl.
|
Ahnicka
Member
08-08-2007
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 9:03 pm
I agree Holly. I've thought for some time now that she may have post-partum depression. Her behavior is just really odd & unusual beyond just drugs, alcohol, & immaturity. There's something else underlying there. I know she's hard headed, but I can't believe no one is doing anything to help her, even if they have to force her by questioning her sanity & reasoning in a court of law. I hope we don't wind up watching her completely unravel like we did with Anna Nicole Smith.
|
Beckie03
Member
07-05-2007
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 9:22 pm
I think she just grew up too fast. She didn't really have a childhood since she started out in Mickey Mouse Club and it just grew from there. I think this "acting out" happened way before the kids. She was sleeping with K-Fed when she barely knew him and was just talking about it like it was nothing. She did this to herself, nobody made her do the things she did and with her pushing away her entire family and not wanting to accept help...there is nothing anyone can do. She is defintely not 51/50... I only feel bad for the kids...
|
Holly
Member
06-19-2005
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 10:24 pm
Well I feel bad for her AND her kids. I think it's just a very sad situation and wish her the best. I hope someone comes along who can help her get over whatever is pulling her down to this level. She must be hurting very badly.
|
Eeyoreslament
Member
07-20-2003
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 10:49 pm
Question: are there residency rules in the States? The only reason we in Canada need to state our province of residence, is to get medical care, and pay taxes to that province. But I would imagine one could own homes in many states or provinces if they could afford it, couldn't they? I just don't understand why the license is such a big deal. Also, down in the States, you actually have to be re-tested for a license in a different state? Here in Canada, we just walk in with a valid license, and I think proof of residence, and BOOM, new license. I hear the "test" why she has been avoiding the DMV.
|
Max
Moderator
08-12-2000
| Monday, October 01, 2007 - 11:17 pm
Different states have different nuances to their traffic laws. For example, in some states, it isn't legal to make a right-hand turn on a red light unless the intersection has a sign saying it's permitted. In other states, you can do that as long as it's safe. In some states, it's the law that if it's raining and you have your windshield wipers on, you must also have your headlights on. Other states don't have such a law. I believe the laws about getting a license in each state may hold different requirements as well. Some require you to take a test, some may just issue a new license as long as your current one is valid. And yes, you need to have a license from the state in which you reside. Here in Oregon, I believe you have 30 days from the time you establish residency to transfer your license and get new plates for your car. After that, you are in violation -- of course no one will know unless you get pulled over for something else. And yes, you can own homes in any state you like. However, you need to choose one as your primary residence, which then establishes where you get a driver's license and where you vote, etcetera. Taking a test for a driver's license is not a big deal, provided you are halfway proficient at operating a vehicle and have read the booklet provided by the State DMV that outlines all the rules. It's a rite of passage. If she can't pass the test, she shouldn't be driving, period. THe whole thing is just plain sad. I just hope that K-fed is really fighting FOR those kids and not some other reason. And I hope Brit gets some help that WORKS soon, before she makes a mistake that takes her own or someone else's life.
|
Twinkie
Member
09-24-2002
| Tuesday, October 02, 2007 - 4:44 am
I didn't have to take any kind of test when I moved from FL to NY. Just turned in my FL drivers license to the DMV and they gave me a NY license. She's been living in CA for a very long time. I don't understand why she has turned it into such a big problem.
|
Twiggyish
Member
08-14-2000
| Tuesday, October 02, 2007 - 5:53 am
It's a sick situation. I feel bad for those children.
|
Marej
Member
09-20-2002
| Tuesday, October 02, 2007 - 6:38 am
According to many sources; (People.com, x17online.com, PerezHilton.com)(x17online is on Team Britney) after she dropped the kids off, she went to the DMV and took care of 1 of the things she has to do. She hasn't taken care of the other things, the drug testing, the counseling, etc and that was the main reason for the temporary handover to Kevin. There is another hearing coming up and to be continued.
|
Denecee
Member
09-05-2002
| Tuesday, October 02, 2007 - 10:14 am
I was watchng CNN about Brittany yesterday, and damn, why do the paparazzi(sp) feel the need to lean on the back of her car to flash the boys over and over and over. I will not support any of the tabloids.
|
Ophiliasgrandma
Member
09-04-2001
| Tuesday, October 02, 2007 - 10:43 am
Dene, are you going to quit watching CNN also. Sounds like they were doing a little 'paparazzing' of their own. I've been noticing on Entertainment Tonight that their cams are always right in the thick of it too.
|