Author |
Message |
Mamie316
Member
07-08-2003
| Wednesday, December 19, 2007 - 2:30 pm
That's funny!
|
Twiggyish
Member
08-14-2000
| Wednesday, December 19, 2007 - 5:09 pm
She's losing her teenage years. This is going to force her to grow up fast.
|
Mamie316
Member
07-08-2003
| Wednesday, December 19, 2007 - 6:31 pm
I don't think that either of the Spears kids had much of a childhood, let alone teenage years. They have been made to become parent-supporting adults.
|
Neko
Member
08-03-2001
| Wednesday, December 19, 2007 - 8:40 pm
quote:She's losing her teenage years. This is going to force her to grow up fast.
Pfft, anytime she wants to be a "normal" teenager again, she'll just give the baby to a nanny, just like Brit-Brit did, before she lost custody of her kids... She's getting 1 million from OK! for the photo shoot of the baby, and she's got money for Zoey 101, so she's gonna be going shopping with this baby, and acting a normal teenager. Which will glamourize teen pregnancy, and stupid girls will think having a baby is just that easy, and that they're gonna have money to go shopping. LOL I'm pretty happy Mama Spears' book isn't getting printed now, cause who would want to read about how to parent their kids from someone who allowed her 16 year old daughter (Who was actually only 15 when she moved in with him, and 13 when they started dating..) to move in with her 19 year old boyfriend.
|
Kitt
Member
09-06-2000
| Wednesday, December 19, 2007 - 9:20 pm
Reports are saying the boyfriend is 18, not 19, now. Access Hollywood mentioned the statutory rape thing but said it does not apply because of their close ages. Hmmmm, seems like they don't apply that rule Genarlow Wilson equally.
|
Oldtex
Member
03-06-2006
| Wednesday, December 19, 2007 - 9:37 pm
I'm not saying that any of this news is good, but what good would come from charging the father of the baby with statutory rape. Heck, he's just a kid too. I'm sure this is hard on all of the families involved. I just pray for this baby. Hopefully lessons have been learned.
|
Kitt
Member
09-06-2000
| Wednesday, December 19, 2007 - 9:41 pm
No good at all. They definitely shouldn't charge him, but I'm surprised, given some of the rules out there, that they haven't.
|
Wilsonatmd
Member
01-23-2001
| Thursday, December 20, 2007 - 8:49 am
You did hear that the magazine that broke the story (OK!) isn't paying her for this interview- but is rumored to be paying $1 million for the baby photos later on....(The only way I'd accept this is if this is going straight into the baby's trust fund- and even then it's still a head-shaker to me)
|
Twiggyish
Member
08-14-2000
| Thursday, December 20, 2007 - 6:53 pm
I think both sisters will do anything controversial to get in the news. Jamie Lynn is probably enjoying the attention.
|
Herckleperckle
Member
11-20-2003
| Thursday, December 20, 2007 - 7:04 pm
1. Is the word 'contraception' not known in the Spears home state of Louisiana? 2. Since abortion is an realistic option, thinking Jamie Lynn DID want the publicity. Course she just ruined her mother's questionable taste book deal, but hey. 3. The family certainly has beauty genes but appears to be missing a certain cranial trait in their gene pool.
|
Neko
Member
08-03-2001
| Thursday, December 20, 2007 - 7:16 pm
"2. Since abortion is an realistic option, thinking Jamie Lynn DID want the publicity. " That's assuming she believes in abortion. Some people don't feel it's right, and no matter how much a pregnancy would screw with their lives, they'd still have that baby, since it's better than "killing it." So perhaps that's how JL feels.
|
Ddr
Member
08-19-2001
| Thursday, December 20, 2007 - 7:26 pm
Yes Herc, birth control is something we know about in Louisiana.
|
Herckleperckle
Member
11-20-2003
| Thursday, December 20, 2007 - 7:30 pm
Sorry, Ddr. Just burns me up, Neko and Ddr, that someone could be so selfish as to usher in a new life without any pretense at having attained any understanding of the responsibility involved.
|
Spygirl
Board Administrator
04-23-2001
| Thursday, December 20, 2007 - 7:55 pm
I'm afraid I have to admit that - at 33 years old - I ushered in a new life thinking I had an understanding of the responsibility involved...but after nearly 10 months, I have to admit I didn't have a flippin' clue. I barely feel like I know what I'm doing now!
|
Herckleperckle
Member
11-20-2003
| Thursday, December 20, 2007 - 8:06 pm
Well, at least you actually did have a clue, Spy. And realizing that it's so much more than you first thought shows that the age at which you had your child makes so much more sense, doesn't it?
|
Seamonkey
Moderator
09-07-2000
| Friday, December 21, 2007 - 10:24 pm
I believe in choice, but I also believe in best place for a child and I can't help but thinking I wish it was a little child that had rights to solid parents, not children who have the "right" to become parents, so much.
|
Jan
Moderator
08-01-2000
| Sunday, December 23, 2007 - 9:04 am
not Hollywood, but good to see just the same. I just saw Caroline Kennedy ( don't know her married name) on TV and she has obviously not ever even had a botox shot let alone any surgery. To me she looked wonderful just letting her wrinkles speak for her character!!!!
|
Mamie316
Member
07-08-2003
| Sunday, December 23, 2007 - 5:59 pm
With a light snow falling outside, Katherine Heigl exchanged vows with musician Josh Kelley in scenic Park City, Utah. The private reception was witnessed by Grey's Anatomy costars T.R. Knight – who told PEOPLE it was "incredible and beautiful" – and Sandra Oh, as well as Private Practice star Kate Walsh and new husband Alex Young. Taking place in a small, private tent at the Stein Eriksen Lodge, the nuptuals lasted about 30 minutes in an area decked out in white flowers and white candles. A walkway from the tent to the nearby reception was lined with white candles, illuminating the fresh snow. The ceremony was officiated by Unitarian minister Tom Goldsmith. Heigl walked down the aisle to an acoustic song written by Kelley and performed by a cello and guitar players. According to a source, the bride and groom wrote their own vows.
|
Mamie316
Member
07-08-2003
| Wednesday, December 26, 2007 - 6:51 pm
They are known to bring good luck in the new year, but one Black-Eyed Pea got lucky early. After 3 years of dating, Fergie and Josh Duhamel are engaged, his rep confirms to PEOPLE. "Fergie called a lot of her girlfriends today to tell them the news," a source close to the singer told PEOPLE. "She said they don't know what kind of wedding they want yet, but that she is the happiest girl on earth." The Las Vegas star's rep would say only that they got engaged "recently," but not on Christmas.
|
Twinkie
Member
09-24-2002
| Wednesday, December 26, 2007 - 7:42 pm
Awww that's sweet. I hope they will have years of happiness.
|
Mamie316
Member
07-08-2003
| Friday, December 28, 2007 - 9:04 am
Sean Penn and wife Robin Wright Penn are divorcing, their rep, Mara Buxbaum, confirms to PEOPLE exclusively. No other details were immediately available. The couple, who've been married 11 years, have two children together, Hopper Jack, 14, and Dylan Frances, 16.
|
Vacanick
Member
07-12-2004
| Friday, December 28, 2007 - 9:15 am
Very sad news .. whatever happened to 'happily ever after'?
|
Cinnamongirl
Member
01-10-2001
| Friday, December 28, 2007 - 9:33 am
Yeah, this was one couple I figured would make it. I also thought they were married more than 11 years. (thanks for all the tidbits mamie, this thread doesn't see as much action as it should )
|
Mamie316
Member
07-08-2003
| Friday, December 28, 2007 - 10:01 am
I try to keep it up! They were together for a while before they got married. (Obviously when you see the ages of the kids)
|
Cinnamongirl
Member
01-10-2001
| Friday, December 28, 2007 - 10:16 am
Ahhhhh yes! makes sense...LOL
|