Author |
Message |
Cinnamongirl
Member
01-10-2001
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 12:08 pm
High Road??...ahahahahhahahhahh. yeah... okay
|
Tishala
Member
08-01-2000
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 12:15 pm
Well, one can surmise whatever one wants--guilty conscience or whatever--but of course nobody knows the intimate details of their personal life. ALL we know about it, in fact, comes from the weeping Ms Aniston. Re; the Vaughan affair. Let's just say this: it was fabricated. To help both of them. I'll stay away from particulars because when I say something truthful, there is always someone to come along to say I'm being mean.
|
Texannie
Member
07-16-2001
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 12:17 pm
Cinnamongirl, what did Julia Roberts do???
|
Escapee
Member
06-15-2004
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 12:21 pm
I just want to know how you know that, that's all.
|
Twinkie
Member
09-24-2002
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 12:29 pm
Oh yeah, its a real high road to take someone else's husband. That seems to be a pattern for her too. Billy Bob was engaged to Laura Dern when he met Angelina.
|
Vacanick
Member
07-12-2004
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 12:32 pm
Twinks ... it takes two. One person cannot MAKE someone do something they don't already want to do.
|
Tishala
Member
08-01-2000
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 12:39 pm
I believe I said that Mr. Pitt and Ms. Jolie's decision not to go to the press was the high road, and it is exactly the opposite of what Ms. Aniston did. And it didn't stop there. Since the breakup, Mr. Pitt bought out Ms. Aniston's share of their production company and she has teamed up with Courtney Cox-Arquette to form another production company. And it just so happens to happen that Mrs. Cox-Arquette's husband recently went on Howard Stern's radio show and bad-mouthed Mr. Pitt for "hurting" Ms. Aniston. Maybe it's because the production company Mrs. Cox-Arquette and Ms. Aniston now own can't get funding for feature film projects (as neither has a profitable film career) and, in Mr. Arquette, they have a good proxy. But who knows?
|
Brenda1966
Member
07-03-2002
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 12:42 pm
I hear you Tishala and agree with it all. I find it interesting that people believe the media that says "Aniston DID want kids" but don't believe the media that says Pitt and Jolie did not "get together" until after the breakup with Aniston. I don't know Jolie, but if anyone is brutally honest I would say it is her. She will say whatever is on her mind. If she says she didn't have a fling with Brad until after he split with Jen, then I have no reason to not believe her. I love seeing pictures of Pitt with his new family. I never did enjoy seeing them of him and Jen. Brad talked a lot about having kids and they were married how long? It certainly didn't appear to be a priority for Jen.
|
Escapee
Member
06-15-2004
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 12:43 pm
David Arquette didn't bad mouth Brad Pitt. He didn't say anything bad about anyone on the show. He said something along the lines of Jen being fine and Brad being a good guy and that he'd seen Brad not too long before.
|
Tishala
Member
08-01-2000
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 12:49 pm
David Arquette didn't bad mouth Brad Pitt. He didn't? David Arquette says Angelina Jolie broke Brad Pitt - Jennifer Aniston's marriage link David - who is married to Jennifer's best friend Courteney Cox - is convinced Jennifer and Brad's marriage would have survived if he hadn't met Angelina. In an interview with US DJ Howard Stern, the actor said: "Jennifer is great. When her marriage to Brad ended, it was sad. I love Brad, he's a great guy but he did some stuff that hurt our friend. "Finding out he was sleeping with Angelina was pretty much a surprise. They wouldn't have broke up if not for that." [... and then there's this...] The 35-year-old actor also dismissed rumors that Jennifer's relationship with her 'The Break-Up' co-star Vince Vaughn was a sham. LOL! Anyhow, I don't think anyone is a prince or a princess in this whole thing. I just utterly reject the idea that one of them is "guilty" and the other is "innocent." And I am very happy that Mr. Pitt and Ms. Jolie seem happy, even if their happiness proves to be fleeting. I wish Ms Aniston the same semblence of happiness, instead of a repeat of the PR-created "affair" she had with Mr. Vaughan.
|
Kitt
Member
09-06-2000
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 12:57 pm
Is Kelly Preston pregnant or is it just this picture? Ug, picture is too big. It's in this link, just slide down to the Travoltas. http://www.tvguide.com/Special/oscars-2007/gallery-live1.aspx Her bust and tummy both look bigger.
|
Maris
Member
03-28-2002
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 1:04 pm
If she is I feel sorry for her. I sure wouldnt want to be pregnant at 45. having a teenager at 60 UGH
|
Escapee
Member
06-15-2004
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 2:01 pm
My favorite picture of the night:

|
Scooterrific
Member
07-08-2005
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 2:04 pm
uuggghh!
|
Maris
Member
03-28-2002
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 2:06 pm
Gore looks like he might be feeling no pain in that pic either. I gather it was towards the end of the evening.
|
Escapee
Member
06-15-2004
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 2:08 pm
That's not Al gore.. That's Leonardo DiCaprio. ETA: Oh, I see him now in the background, duh.
|
Kitt
Member
09-06-2000
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 2:44 pm
I've been looking for other angles on Kelly Preston, and I think it must have been just that photo, or maybe the dress. I didn't realise she was 45, she looks younger. Leo looks so much older than in Titanic in that photo, and Kate Winslett looks just the same.
|
Twinkie
Member
09-24-2002
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 3:07 pm
Leo looks toasted.
|
Wink
Member
10-06-2000
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 3:16 pm
I'm pretty sure I saw Travolta being interviewed somewhere in the last couple of weeks saying either they were having or wanted to have another child.
|
Colordeagua
Member
10-25-2003
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 3:20 pm
If she is I feel sorry for her. I sure wouldnt want to be pregnant at 45. having a teenager at 60 UGH I have friends who have been married for about 20 years. With her at 45, they had their first about a year ago -- planned. I'll admit that I don't understand it. Waited for 20 years? Not for anyone else to question. Mom and baby are healthy. Baby is cute and happy. They're going to try for another.
|
Vacanick
Member
07-12-2004
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 3:31 pm
I'm 41 and if I could have a second child at my age, I would. It'll be interesting to hear if they're pregnant.
|
Wargod
Moderator
07-16-2001
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 3:34 pm
I wouldn't though it's not cuz of my age. Having an 8 and 10 year old I'm used to my kids being self sufficient. They go potty by themselves, feed themselves, shower, pick up, they don't always sleep through the night but after giving me a quick wake up, they just climb in bed with me and we all go back to sleep, lol. I love when my nieces and nephews come over and I can do the whole baby/toddler thing with them, but to tell the truth, it's a relief to be able to send them home to their parents!
|
Native_texan
Member
08-24-2004
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 3:37 pm
It would be easy to say that at 48 I wouldn't mind having another child, but that's because the factory has been sealed and padlocked.
|
Wargod
Moderator
07-16-2001
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 3:41 pm
LOL NT.
|
Escapee
Member
06-15-2004
| Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 3:43 pm
I wanted more kids, but DH, not so much, so he had a snip snip done, and now there will be no more. He was afraid that in 20 years I'd say "honey, let's have another" just when our rug rats were out of the house.
|