TVCH FORUMS HOME . JOIN . FAN CLUBS . DONATE . CONTACT . CHAT  
 Wikia  Quick Links   TOPICS . TREE-VIEW . SEARCH . HELP! . NEWS . PROFILE
Archive through February 28, 2007

The TVClubHouse: General Discussions ARCHIVES: Jan. 2007 ~ Mar. 2007: The Entertainment Place: Anna Nicole Smith (ARCHIVES): Archive through February 28, 2007 users admin

Author Message
Maris
Member

03-28-2002

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 9:24 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Maris a private message Print Post    
Virgies attorneys have already said they will take it up to higher courts of the appeal is denied. I think Virgie sees this as step one in getting the baby, the courts rule that she is next of kin where the body is concerned, then she is de facto next of kin where the baby is concerned. I think this is just her stepping stone towards the millions.

Maris
Member

03-28-2002

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 9:28 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Maris a private message Print Post    
One more thing, I believe that Howard Stern will ultimately give the baby to Larry Birkhead but is agenda right now is two fold:

1. remain on the books as executor and trustee of the kids money - guaranteeing him an income for at least the next twenty five years.


2. keep himself safe from being criminally charged with fraud. I dont think it is an oversight that the birth certificate was not signed and notarized as required in Bahamanian law. Stern on the one hand could have come up with this idea for Anna that he be named the father to put Larry out of the picture, but as an officer of the court he couldnt knowingly be a party to Anna (his client) signing a false affidavit or his signing a false affidavit. if he can present a face of well he thought the baby was his because Anna told him, it keeps him out of harms way regarding criminal charges. He will have enough to worry about with investigation into illegal prescriptions is completed.

Grooch
Member

06-16-2006

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 9:30 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Grooch a private message Print Post    
Milstein is who's lawyer again?

Maris
Member

03-28-2002

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 9:37 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Maris a private message Print Post    
Millstein is the babys appointed guardian

Grooch
Member

06-16-2006

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 9:47 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Grooch a private message Print Post    
Thanks! I'm used to Texas & Florida as names. lol!

Karuuna
Board Administrator

08-31-2000

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 10:00 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Karuuna a private message Print Post    
Maris, their ability to go to Supreme Court may be limited, depending on the apellate court ruling. If they have a simple ruling, ie, we decline to rule, there is no appeal to the Fla Supreme Court.

My best guess: they'll send it back to Seidlin and tell him to leave the guardian in charge, but also formalize that the guardian must act in accordance with Anna's wishes. They did keep asking why Judge Seidlin didn't just do that already.

Karuuna
Board Administrator

08-31-2000

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 10:08 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Karuuna a private message Print Post    
In the paternity case:

Florida Judge ordered release of Anna's DNA to Birkhead's experts for DNA testing. (in favor of the request by Birkhead's attornies).

In the request to order DNA from Daniellynn, he ruled that he couldn't take jurisdiction from the California court.

Karuuna
Board Administrator

08-31-2000

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 10:45 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Karuuna a private message Print Post    
Correction: I may have the Florida Supreme Court appeal backwards. Now I've heard them say that if the apellate court issues a response like: we affirm the ruling, THAT can be appealed. But if they write an opinion and/or clarification, then it cannot be taken up a step to the Supreme Court level.

So, I'm confused. I guess we'll see!

Seamonkey
Moderator

09-07-2000

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 11:00 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Seamonkey a private message Print Post    
According to Jeffrey Fieger (sp) and other pundits on Court TV the other night the big issue is to be the FIRST to "Open up the estate" and they opined that Howard and Larry would join forces so that they could be first because if Virgie (or her attorneys) get there first, then they will be more likely to have control of the money.

So perhaps the guys are joining forces to keep the money or control of same away from Virgie.

Twinkie
Member

09-24-2002

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 11:39 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Twinkie a private message Print Post    
Good! They need to keep her out of the picture. What she is doing right now shows what kind of person she is. Oooh, I wish I could call her what I really want to call her but I'd be modded 6 ways to Sunday. LOL

Karuuna
Board Administrator

08-31-2000

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 11:42 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Karuuna a private message Print Post    
I agree, they should keep her out of it. Honestly, the woman should have just stayed in Larry's good graces. He was willing to work with her, and since even Howard seems to be quietly admitting that he's the real dad, he's going to get custody. But with her being so self-serving, Larry may rethink how kind he wants to be to her when he does get custody.

Native_texan
Member

08-24-2004

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 11:45 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Native_texan a private message Print Post    
The longer Anna is above ground, the longer Vergie gets to live the good life. After all, who wouldn't prefer the Atlantis and limos to their $60K house in Houston. I wonder just how unhappy she is that she lost last week.

Grooch
Member

06-16-2006

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 1:46 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Grooch a private message Print Post    
PNEUMONIA KILLED ANNA NICOLE SMITH, PRELIMINARY FINDINGS INDICATE

Pneumonia — not a drug overdose — killed Anna Nicole Smith, the National Enquirer has learned exclusively.

In the new issue just hitting newsstands, The ENQUIRER reports that preliminary findings reveal that tests performed during the autopsy show Anna Nicole had a severe case of pneumonia. Prescription drugs that she had taken made the condition worse and did play a role in her death. The full toxicology report has not yet been completed.

Sources very close to the death investigation told The ENQUIRER that the prescription drugs masked the seriousness of her pneumonia. Anna Nicole had previously been hospitalized for pneumonia in the Bahamas after her son died.

This time, the painkillers Anna Nicole was taking masked her symptoms and quickened the deadly effects of the pneumonia.

Link

Karuuna
Board Administrator

08-31-2000

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 2:12 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Karuuna a private message Print Post    
That article is from the National Enquirer. Probably close, but maybe not totally accurate? They've been sued multiple times for false reporting....

Karuuna
Board Administrator

08-31-2000

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 2:25 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Karuuna a private message Print Post    
CNN reporting that the apellate court is lifting the stay, issuing an opinion, and ordering that the body be released to the guardian of Danniellynn to be buried in the Bahamas.

Sheilaree
Member

07-19-2002

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 2:41 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Sheilaree a private message Print Post    
Anna is going to the Bahamas to be buried, and also she died of phneumia spelling wrong.

Maris
Member

03-28-2002

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 2:45 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Maris a private message Print Post    
lets see because Virgie said all along she would take it to the Florida supreme court. I look at Virgie and I just keep thinking Grifter

Karuuna
Board Administrator

08-31-2000

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 2:50 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Karuuna a private message Print Post    
Maris, I'm still confused about whether this ruling can be appealed to the Supreme Court. I keep hearing different things.

Landi
Member

07-29-2002

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 2:58 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Landi a private message Print Post    
the spelling is correct sheilaree. Pneumonia. see this link http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,255418,00.html
for the news report


Twinkie
Member

09-24-2002

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 2:59 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Twinkie a private message Print Post    
The longer she drags it out the guiltier she looks, of being just that.

Wink
Member

10-06-2000

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 3:02 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Wink a private message Print Post    
>>>>That article is from the National Enquirer. Probably close, but maybe not totally accurate? They've been sued multiple times for false reporting....<<<<

Well this whole group act like they're lawsuit happy so here's another notch to go on someone's belt.

Sheilaree
Member

07-19-2002

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 3:22 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Sheilaree a private message Print Post    
Thanks Landi wasn't sure.

Native_texan
Member

08-24-2004

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 3:29 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Native_texan a private message Print Post    
Well, if the report is true, while pneumonia is not as exciting as a drug overdose, at least the naysayers can be happy with the possibility that drugs did contribute. And we will all know the pneumonia part will be conveniently forgotten.

Scooterrific
Member

07-08-2005

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 3:34 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Scooterrific a private message Print Post    
NT go to your folder!!!

Karuuna
Board Administrator

08-31-2000

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 3:42 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Karuuna a private message Print Post    
Nah, we'll be angry that someone didn't see to it that she had proper medical care when she was reportedly running a 105 degree fever the night before. An in-room nurse is not sufficient.