TVCH FORUMS HOME . JOIN . FAN CLUBS . DONATE . CONTACT . CHAT  
 Wikia  Quick Links   TOPICS . TREE-VIEW . SEARCH . HELP! . NEWS . PROFILE
Archive through February 17, 2007

The TVClubHouse: General Discussions ARCHIVES: Jan. 2007 ~ Mar. 2007: The Entertainment Place: Hollywood gossip, news & milestones (Archives): Archive through February 17, 2007 users admin

Author Message
Hypermom
Member

08-13-2001

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 9:56 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Hypermom a private message Print Post    
The nanny filed that in December...after she was fired by Anna. They think she is going to sue for being fired.

Escapee
Member

06-15-2004

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 10:35 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Escapee a private message Print Post    
Anna's doctor said that during her delivery she was healthy and drug free and that the baby was born without complication and was drug free as well.

I hate that people want to tarnish an already rusted name, and on top of that, of a dead woman. It's sad. I hate the media when it is like this. Why can't they try to find the good instead of focusing on the bad? (because bad sells, I know I know, but I hate that, it doesn't make me feel better)

Julieboo
Member

02-05-2002

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 10:43 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Julieboo a private message Print Post    
The baby looks pretty thin to me. Hard to tell, only by weighing her and charting her percentile could you tell. At 5 months old, a lot of babies have those sumo wrestler cheeks, which she does not. Doesn't mean that she was underfed, but I would not be surprised of that story was true...

Seamonkey
Moderator

09-07-2000

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 10:49 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Seamonkey a private message Print Post    
Probably because it is difficult to find much "good" here. A baby isn't a football, or a "lovey" to be used by dysfunctional adults to keep them alive or to weep all over. A baby isn't just handed to someone because they rush home to claim them after leaving them with caretakers while they go off to another country to party at prize fights and buy expensive boats. Sorry, just because Howard "loves" and "needs" this little one doesn't mean he should just "win the prize", does it? This is the same person who basically admitted he's holding the child hostage so no one else can "have" or hold her. Refusing to give the DNA sample out of fear and spite.

Of course there should be a guardian ad litem!

Karuuna
Board Administrator

08-31-2000

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 12:40 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Karuuna a private message Print Post    
Well, the will wasn't much help. Apparently the baby gets nothing. Everything was left to Daniel, with Howard as trustee. The will specifically *excluded* future children.

So, if Daniel is the sole heir and he is deceased, will it then go to his heir? And would that be his grandmother? Or Danielynn?

ETA: or possibly Daniel's father?

Costacat
Member

07-15-2000

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 12:51 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Costacat a private message Print Post    
I'm with Escapee on this one...

Until it's been PROVEN that the baby is malnourished, it's just a nasty rumor. And coming from someone who was (apparently) fired, I'd definitely withhold judgement.

I think it's very sad how people are reacting. It's like a feeding frenzy. A human being died, and left behind loved ones, including a child.

I think it's very sad that Anna Nicole Smith still isn't getting any respect.

I think it's very sad.

Native_texan
Member

08-24-2004

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 12:52 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Native_texan a private message Print Post    
Strictly going by Kar's post, according to one of our estate attorneys (I told him to bill the time to the firm LOL), since Daniel died before her and if there is no secondary heir (which would be unusual in a will), her estate would revert back to her line of direct descendants, which would be Dannielynn.

The part they may have specifically excluded future children could be a standard sentence that there are no future children expected.

Darrellh
Member

07-21-2004

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 12:52 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Darrellh a private message Print Post    
Didn't the grandmother raise Daniel for many of his early years? If so, I don't think ANS knew how to take care of a baby.

Karuuna
Board Administrator

08-31-2000

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 1:04 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Karuuna a private message Print Post    
NT, thanks for that. The will specifically excluded future children AND spouses (oddly enough). That would have included Howard and Danielynn. The will is dated 2001.

What's sad to me is that Howard as her attorney didn't prep a new will for her after Daniel died and the baby was born. Some attorney!

Native_texan
Member

08-24-2004

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 1:05 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Native_texan a private message Print Post    
The will is posted at cnn.com. It is a very simple will, but what struck me as interesting (and ya'll know I hate all this speculation going on) was the fax header on the will of 2/3/2007, meaning this will was sent to someone (fax number is also shown - poor folks have probably already had to change the number)five days before she died. Of course this could just be because Anna Nicole and Howard were going to Florida and leaving Dannielynn in someone else's care in the Bahamas.

Karuuna
Board Administrator

08-31-2000

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 1:07 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Karuuna a private message Print Post    
NT, an attorney on CNN is agreeing with you. The language saying that even if she does have another child, the child is still excluded is missing. So Danielynn would still inherit, with Howard as executor, and Ron Rale as the next executor.

It does seem with Stern and Rale as executors, they will get to say her final wishes about her remains.

Native_texan
Member

08-24-2004

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 1:12 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Native_texan a private message Print Post    
Kar, it excluded future children, spouses and step-children. If you think about it, I can understand the spouse and step-children part to prevent any possible foul play and to prevent those people from contesting the will. Using the term "future children" could have been meant as additional protection against step-children.

I'm wondering how many girls are going to pop up now saying they had Daniel's child.

ETA: Kar, I typed this before seeing your last post.

Karuuna
Board Administrator

08-31-2000

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 2:11 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Karuuna a private message Print Post    
Yeah, it does seem like standard language, just odd that it excluded future *children*. Makes this all messier, of course.

I just hope that the will allows for Anna Nicole to be buried with her son. I find it reprehensible that her mother doesn't care about that.

Pamy
Member

01-02-2002

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 2:18 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Pamy a private message Print Post    
poor Anna was surrounded by incompentant legal ppl!!!! She should have had a trust...why she didnt surprises me! A will even if Daniel was alive would still have to probated(costing 1000s and could even be protested!) a trust would not

Pamy
Member

01-02-2002

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 2:21 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Pamy a private message Print Post    
When her mom is in court asking for baby I hope they show in court the tape of Anna saying how she hated her mom....they would be enough to persuade me not to give the mom any rights

Wargod
Moderator

07-16-2001

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 2:31 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Wargod a private message Print Post    
Mom wanting to bury her in Texas instead of in the Bahamas next to her son would be enough to persuade me not to give her any rights. That is just horrible to me.

Mamie316
Member

07-08-2003

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 2:48 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Mamie316 a private message Print Post    
Britney Spears checked into a rehab facility and then abruptly checked out, a source confirms to PEOPLE.

Spears, 25, checked herself into Eric Clapton's Crossroads Centre in Antigua "two or three days ago" but left after just one day and headed to Florida, the source tells PEOPLE.

TV's Extra first reported that the singer had entered a treatment facility. TMZ.com later reported that she checked out less than 24 hours later.

Tishala
Member

08-01-2000

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 3:01 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Tishala a private message Print Post    
Very sad story.

Mamie316
Member

07-08-2003

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 3:04 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Mamie316 a private message Print Post    
It really seems like she's a "Behind The Music" show, just waiting to happen.

Sheilaree
Member

07-19-2002

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 3:24 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Sheilaree a private message Print Post    
I just saw an add for Dancing with the Stars, and I thought it looked like Anna but they just showed it very quickly. I saw that and who is taking care of her children?

Seamonkey
Moderator

09-07-2000

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 8:22 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Seamonkey a private message Print Post    
I would think that the video of Anna talking about her mother, plus the fact that she buried her son in the Bahamas and bought a second plot next to him should (logically) at least settle where to bury her.

The only other remote possibility was I gather she once mentioned being buried next to Marilyn Monroe and it so happens that Hugh Hefner does own a plot or two next to Marilyn.

But I'd say next to Daniel makes emminently more sense.

Certainly shouldn't be up to her mother <shudder>

Sheilaree
Member

07-19-2002

Friday, February 16, 2007 - 8:34 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Sheilaree a private message Print Post    
Nope, I agree. The mother is just out for the $$$$ & fame

Sadiesmom
Member

03-13-2002

Saturday, February 17, 2007 - 1:44 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Sadiesmom a private message Print Post    
Britney is now bald!

Help her someone.

Twiggyish
Member

08-14-2000

Saturday, February 17, 2007 - 5:12 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Twiggyish a private message Print Post    
Is that real? She's gone off the deep end now.

Texannie
Member

07-16-2001

Saturday, February 17, 2007 - 7:02 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Texannie a private message Print Post    
well, they are talking about her shaved head on the Today show this am!
OMG! it looks like that she left some hair in the back and it's very dark too!