Author |
Message |
Seamonkey
Moderator
09-07-2000
| Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 5:22 pm
From TSG: Most 17-page documents we've published have had a dead spot here or there, places where the narrative drags or reads like boilerplate. And then there's the blistering court declaration filed last week by the actress Denise Richards in her divorce case against Charlie Sheen. With its allegations about drugs, gambling, death threats, sketchy web sites, and ladies of the evening, the Richards document is a stunning page-turner. So read it here: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen1.html
|
Christiii
Member
07-07-2005
| Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 5:24 pm
I just cant see if she was so afraid of him and knew about all the problems BEFORE marrying him...that she went ahead..married him and had not one but TWO kids in a really abusive relationship...I think if you put your kids at risk like that than YOU should be at fault too....now..that being said...Im not married and dont have kids, but I did dodge a few bullets and could have been with a couple of guys like that, that needed saving....I sooooo see how you can get sucked into that...BUT if anyone even looked wrong at my dogs, I was done....no way was I going to stand for that...and those are just my doggies...I can only imagine with kidlets!! Wow....she put them in harms way a LOT even before they were born....usually you hear of women in this situation that cant get out because of financial reasons...but she could have easily left him when the first, second of fifth trouble started...soo...Im just taking her acusations with a grain of salt...Im so not on his side either....but this whole thing just seems really odd the way it is playing out....like they said somewhere...most celebs opt to just put irreconcilable (sp??) differences so they dont have to make all the seedy details public record....but she chose to put it all out there....I know she wants to make sure her kids are safe, but there are other ways of doing that..... hey...its just my two cents....and really...what the heck do I know??
|
Twiggyish
Member
08-14-2000
| Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 5:32 pm
I think you're right Eeyore. It's another way of looking at it. After reading your post and others above, I can see he has a history of this behavior. The man had everything including a successful career and a beautiful family. It's very tragic and sick. I'm happy for Denise and Ritchie, but I do think they need to keep it low key. It might be used against her. I can only shake my head at Britney. I don't know if gossip is right about her, but it seems she is having trouble handling the first child.
|
Christiii
Member
07-07-2005
| Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 5:43 pm
wow...I guess Im really in the minority in my feelings....hontestly...I dont usually side with the creep in the story...but this whole thing just feeels really wierd to me....Im happy for Desnise moving on too...but with her close friends hubby?? I just dont get it I guess......
|
Maris
Member
03-28-2002
| Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 6:23 pm
I agree with you eeyore. I think Ritchie asked Denise one day how she was and she just replied in a deep voice "I am not so very how" and it all took off from there.
|
Irishtxgrl
Member
12-07-2005
| Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 8:09 pm
I think Britteny is prego from looking at the pics but who knows
|
Eeyoreslament
Member
07-20-2003
| Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 9:15 pm
Awwww Christiii....you could definitely be right about her; we just don't know. I think once things get abusive, I stop questioning the rational thought of a woman. There are some women who are really strong (I am like you, I'd be gone if a guy sneezed wrong at my pets), but it seems like a consistent story in women's tales of abuse is that they stay FOR the kids (many women say the man only abuses them, and not the kids), and they keep hoping things will change. Perhaps one rationalizes that the kids aren't yet old enough to understand yet, etc. It seems like that last pushing incident involved the possible harm of her child, and maybe that is what woke her up. I really think the Richie Sambora thing has been happening for a while, and the PDA and court filings were just a bad coincidence in timing, but not purposeful. Looks worse than it is. The Britney possible pregnancy reminds me of a funny story. It is "summer hire" time at my restaurant. We hired this hostess, who is young, but very tall (about 6 ft). She's got decent sized boobs, and she wears modest yet stylist tighter-fitting clothing. She has a large gut, and every single person at work is truly wondering if she is pregnant, or if it is a case of a tall girl who maybe doesn't "suck it in" in good posture, and the clothes just don't flatter her either. Our decision is that we wait a month, and try to see if the ponch gets bigger. LOL. So we need to wait a month or two with Britney, and see if the ponch gets bigger.
|
Seamonkey
Moderator
09-07-2000
| Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 10:51 pm
I've seen and heard it all over today, on TV, etc., that Brittney is definitely pregnant.
|
Tanzanite
Member
06-29-2005
| Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - 2:45 am
Maybe all of her actions are calculated attempts to save her life, such as staying visible in the public eye and in the company of a male suitor so as to avoid a repeat of the Simpon style slayings, All of this is so unfortunate. I will be keeping them in my prayers. I really like Charlie Sheen. I pray the best occurs for all involved and that he finds freedom from the chains that are trying to destroy his life and any hope for true happiness.
|
Mak1
Member
08-12-2002
| Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - 4:18 am
Access Hollywood or ET (look like the same show to me) reported yesterday that Britney is four months pregnant.
|
Irishtxgrl
Member
12-07-2005
| Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - 1:11 pm
Hate it that reports say she is not happy about this pregnancy but then again with kevin as the dad I can totally understand
|
Colordeagua
Member
10-25-2003
| Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - 1:13 pm
Cruise Spends Four Hours with Fans Tom Cruise, who was expected to withdraw from a publicity tour to support his Mission: Impossible 3 following the birth of his daughter Suri, has resumed it with a vengeance. British reports said that he spent four hours on the red carpet outside the London premiere of the movie, signing autographs, talking to fans, and chatting with their friends on cell phones. He is due to be on hand for the French premiere in Paris tonight. From the IMDB Guess the new baby thing has worn off for Tom. Katie can escape?
|
Spitfire
Member
07-18-2002
| Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - 1:19 pm
I can't personally decide one way or the other how I really feel about Tom with all I have heard about him lately. What I do believe is that it seems that no matter what the guy is gonna do is going to be wrong.
|
Crzndeb
Member
07-26-2004
| Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - 1:43 pm
So, is Britney one of those, " I thought I couldn't get pregnant when I was breastfeeding"? Geez.....
|
Texannie
Member
07-16-2001
| Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - 3:45 pm
I just hope Tom doesn't forget he has two other kids.
|
Seamonkey
Moderator
09-07-2000
| Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - 4:21 pm
Annie, oh no, the other two kids have assignments already for helping with the baby, so he hasn't forgotten them, at least in terms of assignments. I've seen that in some article and he mentioned it in his interview with Diane Sawyer.
|
Julieboo
Member
02-05-2002
| Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - 4:29 pm
Why is so much attention given to the birth of this child? (As opposed to the birth or adoptions of his other two kids.) Wasn't Nicole just as popular of an actress as Katie is?
|
Texannie
Member
07-16-2001
| Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - 4:56 pm
it makes me crazy how he is acting like this is the 2nd coming!
|
Kristylovesbb
Member
09-14-2000
| Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - 6:15 pm
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/04/26/costner.court.ap/ Kevin Costner named in sex allegations
|
Twiggyish
Member
08-14-2000
| Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - 6:50 pm
I totally agree with you Julie!
|
Maris
Member
03-28-2002
| Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - 6:54 pm
Perhaps it is because Nicole is a more private person and wouldnt allow herself to be treated like Charlie McCarthy's dummy
|
Seamonkey
Moderator
09-07-2000
| Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - 7:09 pm
1. She didn't walk around pregnant for 9 months since her kids are adopted. 2. She's more private. There weren't continuous public displays and declarations going on. 3. Tom wasn't jumping on couches. 4. Tom wasn't bashing other people for their choices at that time. 5. Maybe he didn't have a movie to promote? 6. There wasn't such a large age-gap in that relationship.. oh and they were actually married, too!
|
Jasper
Member
09-14-2000
| Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - 7:57 pm
quote:it makes me crazy how he is acting like this is the 2nd coming!
It's always struck me that the media is the one making the biggest deal out of the whole thing.
|
Seamonkey
Moderator
09-07-2000
| Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - 8:35 pm
Hmm, I'd say they are getting some awfully juicy quotes from Tom.
|
Spitfire
Member
07-18-2002
| Thursday, April 27, 2006 - 6:44 am
I agree with you Jasper. I also wonder if it would not be such a huge deal if there was not as large an age gap between the two. Isn't that what actually started all the "hoopla."
|