Author |
Message |
Eeyoreslament
Member
07-20-2003
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 11:33 am
Maybe they threw water in his face the same way that you throw water in someone's face who is acting hysterically, accompanied by a dramatic delivery of "SNAP OUT OF IT!!" Maybe they felt Tom needed to "snap out of it". LOL
|
Maris
Member
03-28-2002
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 11:36 am
apparently it was a skit for a comedy show in the UK. they had already done the same to Sharon Osbourne who apparently retaliated by dumping a bucket of ice on their cameraman. The network has apologized to Cruise saying it was all in good fun and I think he is going to sue. His publicist said they havent decided what action they will take but they will take action.
|
Tishala
Member
08-01-2000
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 1:01 pm
Some engaging tidbits So here's what I'm hearing about that relationship. A source VERY close to the deal is saying there's a contract. It's worth $5 million. It's for five years. There will be no sex. The deal was sealed June 7. That's what I'm hearing. NY Daily News
|
Mizinvanccouver
Member
02-22-2003
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 3:08 pm
Tishala...I can't figure out who they're talking about in the article. Please tell me!!
|
Tishala
Member
08-01-2000
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 3:30 pm
I don't know! You know I just found out that a friend of mine has a gossip blog--I just found out in the past hour when we were talking about gossip. It's a pretty good one, too--I know cause I borrow stuff from it sometimes! <--That's my gossip for today.
|
Maris
Member
03-28-2002
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 3:31 pm
come on Miz "Engaging????" and lets see which male actor who is engaged and has long been whispered about regarding his sexual orientation, might possibly do a prenupt type contract which states NO SEX and which twenty something actress might give up five years of her life to be a trophy for $5 million.
|
Mizinvanccouver
Member
02-22-2003
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 3:54 pm
Well the only couple I've heard about being engaged is Tom & Katie and Ben & Jen. Ben and Jen are out because she's pregnant. Now I didn't know about this 'No Sex' clause...at first I was thinking Michael Jackson?? But the mother of his children, she's not an actress. If it is Tom & Katie I didn't know he doesn't like sex.
|
Maris
Member
03-28-2002
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 4:31 pm
Miz, rumor has been abound for many years that Mr. Cruise likes sex with men not women.
|
Marysafan
Member
08-07-2000
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 4:42 pm
$5 million doesn't seem like much all things considered...especially the time. IF there's a contract...I sure hope it's better than that. Secondly, it must be a real slow news cycle because this whole Tom Cruise gets squirted in the face and call the guy a jerk sure has gotten a ton more airplay than it warranted.
|
Mizinvanccouver
Member
02-22-2003
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 4:57 pm
Maris-This is the first I ever heard of Tom's sexual preference. Call me naive I guess. lol
|
Tishala
Member
08-01-2000
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 5:04 pm
I have never ever never ever heard that Tom might be other than heterosexual. And if I had heard that--and I haven't--I would never repeat it because, like most heterosexual celebs, he sues people for a hundred million dollars when they say it! I did hear that about him not liking sex because of something or another, like it saps his life force or something. But Mimi Rogers, I think, said he'd thought about becoming a priest or something like that, so maybe it's rooted in that.
|
Maris
Member
03-28-2002
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 5:13 pm
Tish I had heard for years that he was gay. So he wanted to be a priest............Perhaps he and Michael Jackson have a little more in common than I thought.
|
Twinkie
Member
09-24-2002
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 5:31 pm
Can't have it both ways, folks. He got Nicole pregnant but doesn't have sex with women. Come on!
|
Maris
Member
03-28-2002
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 5:37 pm
Twinkie, we have to cover all the bases. it is gossip after all.
|
Tishala
Member
08-01-2000
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 5:52 pm
No, the story about Nicole having the miscarriage was that it wasn't his child, which was the reason for the breakup.
|
Kitt
Member
09-06-2000
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 6:47 pm
But didn't she have a DNA test done after the miscarriage which proved the baby was indeed Tom's?
|
Supergranny
Member
02-03-2005
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 6:48 pm
Remember there is Paris & Paris engagement!
|
Mizinvanccouver
Member
02-22-2003
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 7:05 pm
Oh yes, I forgot about that engagement! But I'm pretty sure the 'no sex clause' wouldn't apply to them. hee hee
|
Spygirl
Moderator
04-23-2001
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 8:17 pm
I believe Tom was actually in the seminary for a year before dropping out. He then dropped his Catholic faith entirely in the early 90s and embraced Scientology because it cured him of his dyslexia. <shrug> He seems to march to his own drum.
|
Costacat
Member
07-15-2000
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 8:35 pm
All's I gotta say is... If I were "her" I'd be asking for a lot more than $5mil. And that no sex clause? Oh definitely, please NO sex with Mr. Engaging! Ick! (Heck, I'd demand that clause!) And yeah, I've heard those rumors for years, too. About sex, and lack thereof with those of the female type, possibly. (Then again, raise your hand if you remember the infamous "gerbil" incident, which was NOT with Mr. Engaging! <snicker>)
|
Juju2bigdog
Member
10-27-2000
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 10:23 pm
Oh dear! <sits on hands and everything else>

|
Tabbyking
Member
03-11-2002
| Monday, June 20, 2005 - 10:35 pm
i remember when tom divorced from mimi rogers she said they didn't have sex....... i always thought he might be gay, too. and i do remember the gerbil incident with another party, although i heard it was a hamster. i remember the joke going around our e.r. that hampsters 'don't drive because they can't get out of geer'.
|
Marej
Member
09-20-2002
| Tuesday, June 21, 2005 - 6:24 am
More interesting tidbits about Mr. Engaging at Fox.com's 411 column today.
|
Tishala
Member
08-01-2000
| Tuesday, June 21, 2005 - 6:28 am
Oprah Reportedly Gets The Boot In Paris Newspaper Column Says Winfrey Denied Entry To Hermes There are published reports that talk show queen Oprah Winfrey was denied entry into an exclusive Paris boutique. A source told the New York Post's Page Six column that Winfrey was denied entry into Hermes in Paris. The source said, "when she tried the door, they refused her entry because they have been having trouble with North Africans." [...] link like 99% of us, oprah could not buy Hermes in paris. i love oprah, but my heart is not bleeding because of this
|
Konamouse
Member
07-16-2001
| Tuesday, June 21, 2005 - 6:48 am
Well, that was interesting. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160192,00.html "There are 16 missing days on her calendar from April 2005. No one seems to know where she was during that time.There are 16 missing days on her calendar from April 2005. No one seems to know where she was during that time." "Sometime that week, her friends say, she flew to Los Angeles for a meeting with Tom Cruise about a role in "Mission: Impossible 3." The meeting took place after April 11. The next time anyone heard from Katie Holmes was on April 27, when she appeared in public as Cruise's girlfriend and love of his life." "Curiously, since the Cruise-Holmes situation popped up, we have heard over and over again that Cruise was the young actress' idol when she was growing up. That's certainly interesting because all of the publicity that used to run on Holmes — still found all over the Internet — lists another Tom as her favorite actor. That would be Tom Hanks" 'squeek'
|