TVCH FORUMS HOME . JOIN . FAN CLUBS . ABOUT US . CONTACT . CHAT  
Bomis   Quick Links   TOPICS . TREE-VIEW . SEARCH . HELP! . NEWS . PROFILE
Disposable digital cameras

The TVClubHouse: General Discussions: 2004 Aug - Oct: Disposable digital cameras users admin

Author Message
Julieboo
Member

02-05-2002

Friday, October 01, 2004 - 3:28 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post    
Anyone know how the pricing for developing works? At our Walgreens (where I swear the people who work at the camera counter do NOT have a clue) regular processing is 7.99 for 2 sets of 24ex. 4x6. (second set is free). For $4 more you can get all the pix on a disc.

Well I bought the kodak digital camera (where the disc is supposed to be free) and they said the price is 11.99 (due to the higher quality of processing-called something like kodak quality processing or something.)

Does that sound right? cuz i paid more for the digital camera, assuming the processing price would be the same.

I do know the solution is to just get a "REAL" digital camera.

but in the meantime...

Anyone?

Juju2bigdog
Member

10-27-2000

Friday, October 01, 2004 - 8:31 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post    
Julieboo, I have seen the ads for the kodak quality processing at the Walgreens checkout counters. The pictures in the ads do make a compelling argument for paying the extra money for the kodak quality processing. The ads show ordinary developing, and the Kodak. The Kodak looks like every photo was custom edited, and it probably was. That is probably why you are paying the extra.

Jed245
Member

11-01-2002

Saturday, October 02, 2004 - 9:40 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post    
I got in trouble once for telling how to mod a disposable camera into something that it wasn't meant to be. :o)

Julieboo
Member

02-05-2002

Saturday, October 02, 2004 - 9:54 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post    
oh, do tell....

Forum_moderator
Moderator

01-01-2004

Saturday, October 02, 2004 - 10:35 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post    
Julie, The reason the information was not allowed to remain on this site is that it was a dangerous process.

Julieboo
Member

02-05-2002

Saturday, October 02, 2004 - 10:55 am   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post    
Oh, then good...Jed, you are so bad!!!

Babyruth
Member

07-19-2001

Saturday, October 02, 2004 - 7:54 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post    
tries to picture Jed rolling and smoking a disposable camera...