Author |
Message |
Panda
Member
07-15-2005
| Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 6:55 pm
Natalie looks very pretty at the veto ceremony..lol
|
Leafsweetie
Member
06-29-2005
| Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 6:56 pm
James looking at memory wall. James: I am so excited for this meeting. I have to go and stab my competition in the back. This has never happened. This is amazing. Everyone its time for the POV ceremony! Everyone inside: Ryan: at this point I feel helpless. Not much I can do to save myself. Sheila: lots has happened. Discovered people I thought cared about me dont' have my back. Very nervous. DOnt know what to expect. James: you have been nominated and I have also won POV and have the right to change my decision. At this time, please make a speech as to why you should be taken off the block Sheila: just want to say from the beginning of this game, definitely made mistakes. Protected people but I've realized that pretty much need to be in this for myself. I want another opportunity to do that. I want to stay. Ryan: Feel like that my word has been truthful have been honest as I can be. Not everyone can say that. I just want to stay. James: Well, I've decided to use the Veto on Sheila. Sheila: are you serious? hugs James. Cries. James: Have decided to nominate Matt. Reason is because last week, you were supposed to be sitting in that chair. Nat, you made the decision to save matt on the chains, and it stuck out that you were playing as two and not as 1. POV is over. I missed what he said to Ryan. Pink hair has defeated the Boston boy, the rivalry is over (Matt in DR). At loss for words, it sucks. Ryan: feel a little better because Matt is the one person they want out as much as me. He's my boy though. Nat: so angry and sad, upset. So full of crap, thats why your eyes are dark brown. God will avenge and take you down. sheila: Blown away, gave me opportunity to start over again. Shows you what kind of person he is. James: finally get to screw everyone who screwed me over last week. Who will be evicted Matt or Ryan? Who will become new HOH... live Wednesday 9/8C after Survivor.
|
Leafsweetie
Member
06-29-2005
| Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 6:57 pm
Nat - I'm offended! My eyes are dark brown and I'm not full of crap! 
|
Klaw73
Member
08-21-2006
| Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 7:02 pm
Great job on spoiling, Leaf and Panda.
|
Wilsonatmd
Member
01-23-2001
| Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 7:05 pm
All this was because James was ticked off Matt didn't vote for him to come back in basically? Jeez...I thought it was more "get rid of the threat" strategy- but it was all personal.
|
Angelicfairies2
Member
07-19-2004
| Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 7:15 pm
It sure was Wilson! I kept saying "James, GET OVER IT"
|
Leafsweetie
Member
06-29-2005
| Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 8:05 pm
Thanks everyone! And thanks Panda for spoiling as well!
|
Jimmer
Moderator
08-30-2000
| Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 8:14 pm
I thought James' stated rationale was that it was because Matt continued to lie to him about voting him back into the house and therefore was demonstrating on an ongoing basis that he couldn't trust him. Of course, who knows if he would have done anything differently had Matt been honest.
|
Panda
Member
07-15-2005
| Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 8:15 pm
you're welcome and thanks! I dropped off at the end b/c of my son, though..lol
|
Trueheart
Member
09-12-2006
| Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 9:45 pm
I thought James' stated rationale was that it was because Matt continued to lie to him about voting him back into the house and therefore was demonstrating on an ongoing basis that he couldn't trust him. Of course, who knows if he would have done anything differently had Matt been honest. I just watched it like 2 secs ago and I don't remember him saying that he was putting Matt up because he lied to him about being the 3rd vote. In fact I was surprised that James did not mention it AT ALL. Maybe James was still not concrete on whether or not Matt was the 3rd vote even though Sharon was positive. He probably would have been more compfortable stating that as a reason if Matt had confessed to not voting James back in. James' speech for putting Matt up was focused on Nat. He said that she made the decision to save matt on the chains, and it stuck out (to him) that she were playing as a couple still. So he said "for myself and everyone else in the house, I have to break that up". So although I do think James' reason of putting Matt up is more personal than he is letting on, I do think it was brilliant for him to blame it on "breaking up the matt/nat alliance". LOL...ok James had just stated that the POV ceremony had started and I paused my DVR and said to my cousin- "This is actually really good for James because he will have two grateful people afterwards! Sheila will feel a lot of gratitude towards him because he took her off and Ryan will be happy to be up against someone that might actually be evicted instead of him." And sure enough they both said as much in the DR after he put Matt up!! I could not help but laugh when Ryan said that he had hope because "Matt is pretty much the only other person in the house that people want gone more than me". I was like...I just said that! Oh and Nat was psycho after wards!! When she said "God will avenge me!" ROFLMBO!!! She sounded fanatical!
|
Leafsweetie
Member
06-29-2005
| Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 10:00 pm
James did let on before the ceremony that he didn't care that he was breaking his word because Matty and Nat continued to lie to him. But during the ceremony he said it was a partners thing.
|
Chiliwilli
Member
09-04-2006
| Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 11:02 pm
Yep, he did and he brought the Mattie/Nattie partnership right out there for all of them to think about. If they don't see it as a problem then they deserve to lose.
|
Bonbonlover
Member
07-13-2000
| Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 11:10 pm
I believe he did put Matt up because mat continued to lie to him. I think if Matt had been straight with James and said he had voted for the mystery box, James would have accepted it... Smart of James to point out the Matt/ Natt partners thing... As we have seen, others have referred to it in the last couple of days.
|
Dogdoc
Member
09-29-2001
| Wednesday, March 19, 2008 - 5:06 am
Sheila was honest about her vote and James told her that is why she went up. Of course he took her off. I think he put Matt up for the same reason. I think I would be bitter and do the same thing.
|
Misosmart
Member
07-03-2005
| Wednesday, March 19, 2008 - 9:00 am
oh I wish I could have seen that one!
|
Curtisahahahaha
Member
07-09-2001
| Wednesday, March 19, 2008 - 9:21 am
Was Matt crying in the diary room? He should have used the waterworks during his entire time in the house. He would have been so much more likeable!
|
Kitt
Member
09-06-2000
| Wednesday, March 19, 2008 - 12:14 pm
So God's going to be a bit busy this week trying to avenge Natalie, is he? Hmmm... Natalie has no real reason to be upset whether James kept to their deal or not (and I kind of think he did, as he didn't put them up first of all), there was no way she could have stayed up their much longer. James could have said no to everything and she'd have still had to get off. It's not like Kaysar and Jen where Kaysar was in no physical distress.
|
Lilac32
Member
07-12-2006
| Wednesday, March 19, 2008 - 12:56 pm
How do I cancel feeds? Have not watched feeds or show since CBS tried to play us by having us vote and then having houseguest vote knowing they would vote James back in because they were afraid someone they were scared of would come back. Are we ,the pubic, supposed to be stupid?
|
Bonbonlover
Member
07-13-2000
| Wednesday, March 19, 2008 - 1:02 pm
Lilac ... just call Real. They can take care of it for you
|
Lilac32
Member
07-12-2006
| Wednesday, March 19, 2008 - 1:06 pm
Thanks BonBon
|
Lilac32
Member
07-12-2006
| Wednesday, March 19, 2008 - 1:20 pm
Just canceled feeds. I will check back now and then to see if James leaves and IF he does I may wach show again
|