Author |
Message |
Tanith
Member
08-25-2006
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:30 pm
Beek, I just read she told Sheila if it comes to a tie she;ll keep Josh. Was wondering what her motivation for that is..?
|
Beekindpleez
Member
07-18-2006
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:31 pm
FWIW...I don't think Natalie is all that concerned about Matt being with Chelsia. And I also don't think she's all that gaga over him. Last night she was talking about how he wouldn't do all the things he did if he really loved his girlfriend as he claims. She was also wondering what her next boyfriend would be like. Sheila told her she'd find a nice guy, that she has a lot to offer. Natalie talked about knowing that she and Matt would never be a couple but would be friends.
|
Beekindpleez
Member
07-18-2006
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:32 pm
Where'd you read it?
|
Kminfinity
Member
06-29-2005
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:33 pm
Bee... Your posts and analysis of the BB players is "spot on." Team Christ has its flaws but they are behaving this way in response to the past play of "Team Pink Mohawk." I HATE when religion gets dragged in, so for me to be approving of a team that names itself "Team Christ" is pretty telling.
|
Tanith
Member
08-25-2006
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:35 pm
Jokers, Beek. Wondering if it's accurate..
|
Victoryrm
Member
09-20-2007
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:35 pm
I hope her next boyfriend never tries to leave her. That could be dicey. lol 
|
Beekindpleez
Member
07-18-2006
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:36 pm
Thanks, Km...I calls 'em as I sees 'em. But I really do value them all. Anyone who is willing to give up three months of their life like this is valuable to me.
|
Beekindpleez
Member
07-18-2006
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:37 pm
Aahhh, Tanith...the grain of salt must be taken. I didn't hear that.
|
Lurknomore
Member
07-07-2001
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:38 pm
TY Bee, that is exactly what I would have replied. Nat's only danger is they realize that she is lying for jury votes knowing he is going and they force her to break the tie and show her hand. And I never said Nat wasn't lying. But as with everything else in this game, it's all in degrees. Nat never swore on a bible and gave her word. She did truthfully lie more than I'd care for, but her lies are so minor compared to all the others that while not liking them, it doesn't really tarnish her in my eyes as it would if others were being 100% honest.
|
Tanith
Member
08-25-2006
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:39 pm
Jokers, Beek. Wondering if it's accurate..
|
Lurknomore
Member
07-07-2001
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:39 pm
Bee, what she told Sheila is how she doesn't want it to be a tie because she might have to keep Josh thinking about her long term game. The point of saying it wasn't to keep Josh...it was to make sure there wasn't a tie and he left. So it shows she is being totally honest with Sheila at least
|
Tanith
Member
08-25-2006
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:39 pm
grrr, why did I double.
|
Bonbonlover
Member
07-13-2000
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:40 pm
Nat did tell Josh that if it came to a tie she would keep him. She says that Sharon is boring and Josh promises her his end vote and to not put her up next week
|
Tanith
Member
08-25-2006
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:40 pm
Josh needs to go. He'll prove more deadly to James if he stays, IMO. 
|
Bonbonlover
Member
07-13-2000
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:41 pm
When Nat and Josh were talking she said that she wants to talk with James tonight (not after HOH) and she wants to get a promise out of him... She has always wanted to work with James, but she is afraid she cant trust hi. Josh tells her that James wants to win her trust. She also agrees that her "side" is about to implode...
|
Nana731
Member
07-06-2005
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:42 pm
There are degrees of lies? Please explain.
|
Lurknomore
Member
07-07-2001
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:42 pm
To further clarify, based on MH0 lol, remember yesterday James threated Nat that if she voted Josh out they lost all 4 of their jury votes, which would virtually insure even if she made final 2 she would lose the game (even though she might still get one more vote but it would be hard). So Nat is trying to fix it so she doesn't lose all their jury votes but still gets Josh out.
|
Tanith
Member
08-25-2006
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:44 pm
Nat can't fix it. Funny that James is trying to make her think she can. I don't think they would ever vote for Nat. Maybe over Sheila.
|
Lurknomore
Member
07-07-2001
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:44 pm
Nana...get it to be a tie and I'll give you my vote (when you know he doesn't have the votes) is a lie Swearing on a bible that you are making a deal and will not nominate a person if they save you, then going and laughing how they are the one you will put up is, to me, a different degree of lie. Not only in content, but definately in swearing on the bible and family member lives. Hope that clarifies your question Nana.
|
Beekindpleez
Member
07-18-2006
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:45 pm
Nat did tell Josh that if it came to a tie she would keep him. She told Josh that to placate him, I think. She has said all week that she wants him to think he's staying so that he won't go off on another tirade. She believes that if he thinks he's safe, he'll stay calm.
|
Beekindpleez
Member
07-18-2006
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:47 pm
Tanith...do you mean if it's a Natalie/James final two? I think she would get ALL the votes except for Chelsia, Josh and Sharon...and she might even get Josh and Sharon.
|
Gimmeshelter
Member
07-18-2005
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:49 pm
Why is Jame's telling Nat that if she voted Josh out she would lose their votes a THREAT? If the same thing happened but the sides were switched the so called "threat" would be just "something to think about"
|
Tanith
Member
08-25-2006
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:49 pm
Beek, no. Nat vs. anyone but James.
|
Jushvnfn
Member
07-29-2006
| Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 1:49 pm
These people are like lab rats in a round house looking for a corner! I don't know how they can keep it all straight.
|