Author |
Message |
Klaw73
Member
08-21-2006
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 4:59 pm
Cricket, not at all. I think Josh is getting very lucky with the James/Matt/Natalie situation. Of course, Sharon offering herself as the pawn to protect him helped too. I cannot stand it, but game wise Josh knows exactly when to instigate problems in the house to keep the heat off of him. So far, it's worked.
|
Cricket
Member
08-05-2002
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 4:59 pm
Cricket: it's obvious-- nat won't put anyone from her side and there is not a lot on sharon.... Obvious about what, Rebelmom? Why James would know he's going home? I thought he believed Nat last night, but today he said something that indicated he knew he was the target this week, so I was wondering if Josh told him. I just don't understand the "Nat Pack" (I like that name too, Acat) always telling the other side their plans. Why do they keep letting them know they want Josh to stay? Sheila just said it again. What happened to just being quiet in case the person you wanted to go somehow stays? Why did a deeper hole? I just don't get this business of putting someone on the block and telling them they are staying. That's sooo boring and there's no watching the two on the block campaign against each other if one knows they are staying.
|
Cricket
Member
08-05-2002
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:00 pm
In that way, Klaw, he and Sheila are playing somewhat similar games.
|
Caycaye
Member
09-14-2001
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:00 pm
Sure, Panda.... But I don't think Natalie meant anything really ugly about Sharon...she has said Sharon is a nice, "good" girl, but Natalie just doesn't trust Sharon and considers her a "mole" because she is on the opposing side...I think that is reasonable.... Now if Nat starts calling Sharon hateful names and talking about her appearance, etc. I would consioer that uncalled-for and mean behavior....but not trusting someone is a good thing in BB, I think....
|
Acat
Member
03-03-2008
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:01 pm
Cricket - I think that is soo true.. They always have all their cards out on the table.
|
Alt_hazel
Member
03-08-2008
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:01 pm
ITA Rebel about the "Matty Matty Matty". All I hear is "cappy cappy cappy" redux! Playing the game for the fallen martyr. I think it is as obnoxious this time as it was in sea six.
|
Panda
Member
07-15-2005
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:02 pm
I agree, Cricket....at least Josh is involved in some secret alliances...seems no one can do that this year. I don't even think there is any more room for one this year. hopefully?
|
Cricket
Member
08-05-2002
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:02 pm
We think they are taking place right now, Caycaye. I know, Acat. Has it been so obvious in previous years? I almost wish the DR would tell them they can't tell the ones on the block who is going home or something.
|
Panda
Member
07-15-2005
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:04 pm
Caye-I know it isn't meant as ugly talk. I understand why she said it about Sharon. IMO, they have not given Sharon any reason not to go to Josh. I am saying if Matt was there, and even if they were on the side w/ one less alliance member, Nat would do the same as Sharon.
|
Klaw73
Member
08-21-2006
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:04 pm
In that way, Klaw, he and Sheila are playing somewhat similar games. LOL...you're right.
|
Rebelmomx2
Member
08-16-2006
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:04 pm
Cricket: what i meant is that it is obvious to james that if he gets put up and it's more likely than not that he's going home.... not to say that he wouldn't be playing his heart out for the veto, he might just be saying that to have josh go all freaky inside.... i don't know what his motive are... but he knows that it's gonna be either J/J going home this week.... he always says that if he's on the block that week, "i'm going home".... but then later comes in just before POV and says, "i just might win it" by where freaking everyone else out so they don't do well in the POV.... cuz he will take himself down and if it is sharon going up, bye bye josh....
|
Cricket
Member
08-05-2002
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:06 pm
However, Panda, Matt isn't there and it's becoming obvious to some of them there might eventually be a guy/gal split, so Sharon would do well for herself to get closer to Nat. She's not aware at all that Josh has an alliance with Adam/Ryan. She's been told twice that Josh doesn't really have her back. When will it sink in? Josh's alliance buddies don't like her, so where will she be if it does go girls against guys? She's not with the girls right now.
|
Panda
Member
07-15-2005
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:07 pm
I want to add that I don't expect Nat to trust Sharon. lol
|
Klaw73
Member
08-21-2006
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:07 pm
Did James even try to get in Natalie's head today? That's one thing that blows my mind about the J/J/C/S alliance. They go to people, make deals, and then don't follow-up (Ryan's HOH).
|
Rebelmomx2
Member
08-16-2006
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:07 pm
How safe do think Sharon and Josh feel when they are talking to the Nat Pak and they hear.... 'we are breaking up the couples'.... J/S are still a couple, hello.... would make me very nervous, they are still sleeping in the same bed.... Why does Sharon keep letting josh use her to take the block for him.... if i were sharon, i would have cut that cord 2 weeks ago....
|
Jr9209
Member
07-14-2007
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:07 pm
Sheila surprises me though.... for being 45, she is really trying to play 20 something and it's gonna hopefully get her to sequester... enough! she is really messing up everyones game.... perhaps that's her game.... whodathunkit I have to give Sheila kudos... if you can't compete with the younger ones in challenges then mess with their minds.
|
Klaw73
Member
08-21-2006
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:09 pm
OMGsh, I would love to see Sharon wake up, split from Josh, and start playing her own game.
|
Panda
Member
07-15-2005
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:09 pm
I think that a girls alliance would be great gameplay!....I am hoping that maybe Nat will do something help pull her in then. I don't think they are convincing enough so Sharon will still stick by her guy Josh.....
|
Cricket
Member
08-05-2002
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:10 pm
Cricket: what i meant is that it is obvious to james that if he gets put up and it's more likely than not that he's going home Oh, Rebelmom, I thought he told Nat if she had to put him up that was okay. That's why I was surprised that he was convinced he was going home today. Nat needs to tell the Nat Pack that nothing goes out of HOH. Last night, Adam went straight to Josh/Sharon and said Nat was gunning for James. If James comes off the block and it's Josh/Sharon, Josh isn't going home...Sharon is. Adam/Ryan both said they'd vote her out. Sheila won't like that one bit. However, Nat, Ryan and Adam don't like Sharon, that's why I think Sharon is so very foolish to do Josh's bidding instead of getting closer to Nat.
|
Rebelmomx2
Member
08-16-2006
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:11 pm
Klaw: ITA-- and they make deals way too soon... they don't divide and conquer.... they let the other side talk as long as they want with each other and HOH... unbelievable! That's when I'm usually screaming into the lap top and my DD comes upstairs or in my room, 'u ok mom....'... embarassingly i say, 'ya, these guys drive me nuts'... she asks, 'why are u still watching them then'....? u see where the better brains are in this conversations, don't ya 
|
Caycaye
Member
09-14-2001
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:11 pm
TY Cricket.... I LOVE Natalie (can't ya tell! LOL!) but I must admit....I HATE the "Mattie, Mattie, Mattie" reverence...as much as I hated Ivette's obsession with Cappy. I actually liked Ivette too, but both of the poor girls gave such loyalty and devotion to guys who didn't return their admiration or loyalty. Even though some people say it makes Natalie look stupid...I don't look down on her for having such a devoted personality. She is definitely too trusting and naiive, but that doesn't bother me as much as the fact that her loyalty and devotion is so rare and such an awesome trait, and it was wasted on someone who did not deserve it...Even Mattie knew he was undeserved....jmho
|
Panda
Member
07-15-2005
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:12 pm
Ryan and Adam setting themself up in a good spot-just incase James comes of the block.
|
Rebelmomx2
Member
08-16-2006
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:13 pm
When they came outside, J/N were talking (james) in the back room somewhere... I heard James say "f'ing b..." then they all came outside, except for sheila... wonder what that's all about.... it showed j/j playing pool, sharon getting in the hammock waiting to hail sheila when she came out and the other two boys smoking/walking around in circles....
|
Klaw73
Member
08-21-2006
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:13 pm
LOL, Rebel. I know what you mean my daughter and dogs both were looking at me like I was crazy last night. hehehe
|
Cricket
Member
08-05-2002
| Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 5:13 pm
Panda, I agree with you that Nat doesn't trust Sharon one bit and Sharon isn't doing anything by running back to Josh/James to help ensure any trust. She's telling the women not to trust her by continuing to stay with Josh after what they've told her about him.
|