Author |
Message |
Tissy
Member
07-28-2003
| Friday, April 18, 2008 - 10:27 am
ITA Ladytex - Sheila would have been No.1 target for Ryan and Nat this week - now she`s only a target of Ryans. The one who stands to lose the most with this move now is Adam.
|
Queenfish
Member
07-19-2006
| Friday, April 18, 2008 - 11:39 am
Yeah, it would have been in Adams best interest had Nat stayed, but sheila was the hoh and she had to do what was the best for her. And I agree with Alt_hazel, right on.
|
Costacat
Member
07-15-2000
| Friday, April 18, 2008 - 4:18 pm
I disagree that it would've been in Adam's best interest if Natalie stayed. Natalie wouldn't take Adam to the end; she'd take Ryan. Adam knows that Sheila might, so he stands a better chance with her.
|
Csnog
Member
07-18-2002
| Friday, April 18, 2008 - 5:10 pm
Sheila should have taken Nat under her wing long ago when Matt left. Sheila thinks she just needs Adam. Now it's 2 against 2 when Sheila could have rid the house of Sharon. Always have another one in the nest.
|
Earthmother
Member
07-14-2002
| Friday, April 18, 2008 - 5:36 pm
Sheila has Sharon and Adam. It would have been Ryan has Sharon and Adam. Sharon has Sheila and Ryan. Adam has Ryan and sheila....so Nat would have helped Sheila how??? She already told Sheila to her face that she would not be with her, only her boys. I just don't get all this ire over Sheila kicking out Nat. Sheila just like every other person in this game, including Nat, was there to win the money. Personally I'm enjoying this season since there are 3 out of 4 people still standing I wouldn't mind winning. The only one I hope doesn't is Ryan, but if he does, good for him, I would not regret watching.
|
Bbnine
Member
02-16-2008
| Friday, April 18, 2008 - 5:40 pm
(((LOSE POV SHEILA!!)))
|
Watching2
Member
07-07-2001
| Friday, April 18, 2008 - 5:43 pm
Great points, Earthmother.
|
Costacat
Member
07-15-2000
| Friday, April 18, 2008 - 6:04 pm
Sheila absolutely made the best move possible by kicking Natalie out the door. It was the only way to have a chance to advance in the game past next week. Natalie's big blunder was to say, twice, that she was backing "her boys." Saying it on live TV just gave Sheila a live TV excuse for her eviction speech. If Sheila had NOT evicted Natalie, that would've been SHEILA'S big blunder (and would've been right up there with the Marcellus and Dustin blunders). I'm agreeing, EM. At first I thought I wouldn't mind any of the four, but I've decided if I had to choose who to put into F3, it'd be Sheila, Sharon, and Adam. I wouldn't mind either of the three winning.
|
Csnog
Member
07-18-2002
| Friday, April 18, 2008 - 6:33 pm
Nat would not have been with the boys if Sheila had taken an interest and befriended her back then. Nat would not have approached the guys in an alliance. Sheila could have played her best friend. Having Nat at the end of the game was what Sheila needed instead of Sharon. No one would vote for Nat. I still want Sheila and Adam in final 2.
|
Tissy
Member
07-28-2003
| Friday, April 18, 2008 - 7:11 pm
Nat was and always has been for the `boys`.
|
Goldie
Member
04-01-2008
| Friday, April 18, 2008 - 7:13 pm
Yeah, I got a feeling Nat has favored the boys pretty much her whole life. jmo
|
Denecee
Member
09-05-2002
| Friday, April 18, 2008 - 7:22 pm
and that is not a bad thing, boys can be fun.
|
Gina8642
Member
06-01-2001
| Saturday, April 19, 2008 - 4:31 am
Absolutely Sheila did the right thing in evicting Nat. I agree it would have been a Marcellus moment if she did any different. It was also clear during Nat's interview with Julie that Nat didn't hold anything against Sheila for evicting her. Nat was more bewildered and hurt by "her boys" decision. But she also seemed to nod when Adam said it was in his best interest to see Nat go.
|
Costacat
Member
07-15-2000
| Saturday, April 19, 2008 - 4:55 am
Natalie would never have stuck to an all-girls' alliance. I think Natalie is all about being the only woman surrounded by a lot of men. Not that there's anything wrong with that. But there IS something wrong with giving lip service to sticking with the girls when you know darned well as soon as a "boy" pays attention to you, that girls' alliance is gone. (Natalie strikes me as the type of girl who will make plans with her girlfriends for Friday night, but meets some guy on Thursday night who asks her out the next night, and so she cancels the girls' night out thing. If you know what I mean.)
|
Oaktree
Member
03-16-2008
| Saturday, April 19, 2008 - 5:13 am
I've never been a fan of Girl's Night Out.
|
Spunky
Member
10-08-2001
| Saturday, April 19, 2008 - 6:21 am
The way Ryan wants to get rid of Sheila is sickening, forcing Adam to get rid of her and telling him not to say anything to Sheila is quite cruel. I hope Adam is patient until POV ceremony and then tells all to Sheila so that she has a chance to fight for another chance to stay. Ryan did the same with Natalie and he's doing the same with Sheila, getting rid of all room for bargaining their way out of the corner he put them in.
|
Bbnine
Member
02-16-2008
| Saturday, April 19, 2008 - 7:24 am
How is it cruel ... no different had Adam won HOH and aske Ryan same thing .... he is playing the game best for him. GO RYAN! If he doesn't and Ryan takes sharon off block and Adam goes up ... adam loses.... sharon would evict him ... Besides after the POV ceromony ... there will be no time to talk it will be an imediate eviction. say BU BYE to sheila! Karma is coming a knockin .. 
|
Tissy
Member
07-28-2003
| Saturday, April 19, 2008 - 7:29 am
More than likely Sheila would have been evicted this week even if Nat had stayed. Pleased she at least outlasted Natalie.
|
Merrysea
Moderator
08-13-2004
| Saturday, April 19, 2008 - 8:06 am
The girls would have had a better chance at having Natalie in an all-girls alliance if they hadn't spent her last week-and-a-half bashing her and then putting her up on the block with Sharon. At that point, there was no longer a girls alliance for her to be part of.
|
Tissy
Member
07-28-2003
| Saturday, April 19, 2008 - 8:18 am
Natalie had no intention of being part of a girls alliance from the onset.
|
Earthmother
Member
07-14-2002
| Saturday, April 19, 2008 - 8:38 am
If Natalie had EVER wanted to be part of the girl's alliance then she would not have run to the boys with the info. She claimed she was playing both sides for her and the boys, instead she should have played both sides for herself. Bad game play in my opinion.
|
Spunky
Member
10-08-2001
| Saturday, April 19, 2008 - 11:27 am
I don't care if Sheila goes, I do care the way Ryan wants Adam to kick her out, despicable! At least let Adam explain why Sheila is going and I hope Sheila is smart enough to understand it all by herself and call Ryan out... bout time! If if she goes, someone should call Ryan out and tell him he cares more about someone who came from another alliance than his own. At least Sheila spent time with Ryan and Adam more than Sharon who was just offered the game on a silver platter (by Ryan).
|
Bbnine
Member
02-16-2008
| Saturday, April 19, 2008 - 12:44 pm
At least let Adam explain why Sheila is going why? sheila wouldn't eplain anything to Nat ahead of time...she wouldn't alow her "guys" to either.... why should sheila get a break? ...becasue she is a 46yo single mother? BB: pack your bags sheila...karma is knocking on BB door...and it is for you! ...  
|
Seattlemom
Member
05-10-2005
| Saturday, April 19, 2008 - 2:14 pm
Bbnine from your mouth to LOL I won't say it **** You hear what I'm sayin ***
|
Goldie
Member
04-01-2008
| Saturday, April 19, 2008 - 3:13 pm
To me, when it gets down to F4 it's not about alliences anymore. As for bag packing, BB just told all but Ryan to pack and put their suit cases in the SR. If Ryan wants a chance he needs to take Sharon off put up Adam and have Sharon vote Adam out. Then Ryan and Shelia need to beat Sharon.
|