Author |
Message |
Hokiejm
Member
03-22-2008
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 12:14 am
This is my first post, I have been lurking for far too long. But, I read something about Sharon being Maggie 2.0 and I think it's great! She has votes is sequester and the rest of the house is doing her dirty work. But there is not fun of S6 to keep me going....worst final 5 ever!
|
Klaw73
Member
08-21-2006
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 8:56 am
Sharon, at this point, makes me appreciate James, Josh, and Chelsia so much more. At least they didn't pretend to like Natalie to her face, then trash her behind her back. And seriously, Sharon wouldn't be there right now had it not been for Natalie. I don't get her hating on Natalie so much for making deals when she has done the same. Sharon is the one who suggested the "girls alliance" in the first place and in the meantime, was making a F2 deal with Ryan. Why does this girl think she is so much better???
|
Csnog
Member
07-18-2002
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 9:12 am
I have nothing good to say today after catching up on last night.
|
Beekindpleez
Member
07-18-2006
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 9:14 am
Sharon reminds me of that old saying: When someone shows you who they really are, believe them. I also have nothing good to say about Sharon, Cs.
|
Caprica
Member
02-10-2007
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 10:11 am
Why is it OK for Nat to go along with the "Girls Alliance" to the girls faces while making final three alliance with the boys BUT it is not OK for Sharon to do the same? Sharon did not start truely bashing Nat until she found out that Nat was calling her the "MOLE". That really ticked her off.
|
Beekindpleez
Member
07-18-2006
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 10:14 am
Sheila named Sharon "The Mole". How funny is that?
|
Sandra
Member
07-06-2004
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 10:17 am
That is hilarious!
|
Sportsfan
Member
09-03-2007
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 10:29 am
+ =??
|
Sportsfan
Member
09-03-2007
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 10:36 am
I like this one too! 
|
Beekindpleez
Member
07-18-2006
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 10:37 am
LOL, Sportsy!
|
Klaw73
Member
08-21-2006
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 10:42 am
Caprica, I am not saying it's okay for Natalie to do and not them. My issue is that Sheila, Sharon, and Natalie all agreed to a "girls alliance," yet neither Sharon nor Sheila are owning it. They are just blaming it all on Natalie. And Sharon can thank Sheila for being called "the mole." Again, Natalie is getting the blame for something her entire alliance has done. ETA: when the boys confront Natalie, Sharon, and Sheila on Sunday, I hope Natalie reminds them that she told them all about it and reported everything she learned to them, then look at Sheila and ask...did you?
|
Klaw73
Member
08-21-2006
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 10:42 am
rolmbo, Sports...too funny!!!
|
Caprica
Member
02-10-2007
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 11:20 am
Sharon's plan might just work. By getting Shelia to put Nat on the block and having Adam and Ryan vote her out she is locking in her 4th vote for the win. It would be better for Ryan's chances to force a tie there for pulling Nat's vote to him. Sharon is sinking Shelia's chances for a win just by egging on her Nat hate. If the boys or Shelia turn on Sharon she also has the power to turn the vote against anyone she wants. Josh,James,Chelsia and Sharon will control the jury.
|
Sherbear
Member
07-19-2001
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 11:49 am
I like Sharon. She hasnt been crazy about her religion in the game, yet doing things that contradict it. She stayed loyal to people. She doesn't like Natalie and never has. She learned from others behavior and adapted to it. In my mind her turning against Nat. was her only option when Nat said Sheila was out next, she went with it.
|
Earthmother
Member
07-14-2002
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 11:55 am
Exactly Sherbear she had to turn on someone.
|
Klaw73
Member
08-21-2006
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 11:58 am
They all have to turn on someone at this point in the game. Do they have do it hatefully, harshly, and in a very vindictive manner?
|
Earthmother
Member
07-14-2002
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 12:00 pm
How else can they plant seeds of doubt. They have to demonize someone else or they go home.
|
Klaw73
Member
08-21-2006
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 12:04 pm
EM, easily. Natalie agreed to a girls alliance, wants to target the boys, and offered to use the POV on me this week. End of story. No name calling, no making fun of someone's appearance, etc. Of course, the problem for Sharon is, Natalie has already told the boys about the "girls alliance" and has reported everything she learned in the process. When the confrontation comes out Sunday, I am certain she will remind the boys of this and will point out that Sharon is only mad b/c she didn't follow through with Sharon's plan.
|
Earthmother
Member
07-14-2002
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 12:15 pm
Personally that wouldn't be enough for me Klaw. One person's word has proven to be the end for so many. (Kayser)
|
Klaw73
Member
08-21-2006
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 12:17 pm
You might be right, EM, but really Sharon is only demonizing Natalie to Sheila who has little control over who gets voted out unless it's a tie. I don't think Adam or Ryan would sit around and listen to those two spew their hate.
|
Earthmother
Member
07-14-2002
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 12:21 pm
Sharon is demonizing Natlie to feed into Sheila's anger at Nat right now. As long as she can keep Sheila taking the bait the better chance she has of Sheila making Nat leave. I don't think Sharon trust the boys to do the job so she has to villify Nat and try to convince Sheila that Nat is coming after her.
|
Jimmer
Moderator
08-30-2000
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 12:39 pm
Vilifying your opponent seems a tried and true BB strategy and has been done by countless players throughout the years. I'm trying to think of someone who made it near the end without vilifying his or her opponents. Maybe Jason but that is it (and he was in alliance with one of the biggest proponents of that strategy).
|
Earthmother
Member
07-14-2002
| Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 12:51 pm
Jason was smart he had Dani running interferrence for him and we know how good she was at villifying. I think there justs comes a time when you don't have a choice but to make your opponent seem undesireable.
|
Spunky
Member
10-08-2001
| Saturday, April 19, 2008 - 5:58 am
Can this girl be so lucky?? If she is, then she will win the game. Not only she had the chance to re-enter the house but she practically did nothing to arrive to F3 or even F2. She was given the opportunity to stay week after week and she was given an alliance on a silver platter (Ryan), she didn't ask for it, it came to her. How lucky is that?? She will be the last woman standing, thanks to Ryan. Is this enough to win this game. I hope she will win, thanks to the arrogance of others.
|
Muffin
Member
08-29-2007
| Saturday, April 19, 2008 - 8:45 am
She doesn't deserve to win. Has does nothing but talk against people. Not to mention she has done nothing in that house - doesn't cook, clean, no sense of humor, nothing.
|