Author |
Message |
What555456
Member
06-14-2005
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 10:11 am
It is clearly time for a double eviction this week. BB needs to do it to get the number of HG's down so they can finish this by 9/18 and any later gets to be too few HG's to send out 2. So, Jen supposedly has a penalty nomination and cannot play for the veto (this remains to be confirmed by BB, as I understand it). This then, becomes the perfect week for a double eviction. Jamecka is evicted Thursday. New HoH chosen. Immediate nomination of one other to sit with Jen. Eviction by Sunday (I think it would be). I assume BB will make sure Zach or Amber goes. Then all is back to normal within a couple of days, rather than a week, and they all can play completely next week.
|
Realurker
Member
08-10-2004
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 10:29 am
I always envisioned a penalty nomination would be a third person, along with 2 regular nominations
|
Dbald
Member
08-04-2007
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 10:33 am
that is what was said last night on the show, jessica said hoh still nominates 2 people in addition to the pen nom.
|
Kc103
Member
07-13-2004
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 10:33 am
Was there any more talk of a 3 person final? I thought right at the beginning of the show there was some talk of that. Must have just been a rumor.
|
Seattlemom
Member
05-10-2005
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 10:57 am
I don't think Jen really got a penalty nom, because I never heard BB call her into the diary room again as she was eating. I know she read the rule book that said you would get one but ( and if she didnt get one for eating it's not fair to those still on slop) I think she made it up, and they will find out soon enough if as Zack sugested they get rid of Jameka since Jen is penalty nomed next week. Watch Jameka get evicted and then they will find out she still plays for HOH.
|
Spunky
Member
10-08-2001
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 10:58 am
I don't think Jen has to stay another week just because of tha penalty nomination. That penalty nomination becomes nul and void if the vote on Thursday is for her eviction. They can stuff that penalty nomination where the sun doesn't shine.
|
Hobbs
Member
08-05-2002
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 11:01 am
They might have a final 3 and not just two. That's what Survivor did last season. AG productions likes to steal ideas.
|
Oddsygirl
Member
07-11-2006
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 11:10 am
Seattle, Jen was called to the the DR a total of 3 times last night. When she was trashing the cigarettes, After she finished her Turkey burger, apple and cottage cheese, and after she mentioned to Eric, Jess and Dick that she had been given a penalty nom. After that, both Zack and Jessica went to the Diary room to confirm that she had a penalty nom.
|
Klaw73
Member
08-21-2006
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 11:15 am
When Jen came out and said she got penalty nomination. She did not get a warning to stop talking about DR sessions - neither did Zach. Make of it what you will, but I get the feeling its phoney baloney...lol.
|
Kalekona
Member
06-12-2005
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 11:18 am
her getting a penalty nomination wouldn't be something said in the DR that she couldn't speak about klaw.
|
Klaw73
Member
08-21-2006
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 11:25 am
Oh, I don't know the DR rules, but I assumed since Dick gets DR interference every time he mentions his warnings, the same would apply for Jen.
|
Oddsygirl
Member
07-11-2006
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 11:28 am
It was also noted by several of the house guests, who were all called to the DR at some point, that all the Executive directors were off with Danielle and Amber last night. It will be interesting to see if anything changes when they are able to see the footage.
|
Hobbs
Member
08-05-2002
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 11:31 am
It was also noted by several of the house guests, who were all called to the DR at some point, that all the Executive directors were off with Danielle and Amber last night. Now that was not a smart idea by the producers. These guys are clowns! ETA: The producers or J/D. Take your pick.
|
Bbnut
Member
06-12-2006
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 12:06 pm
Double eviction doesn't work that way. Example Jen and Jameka on block...one of them gets voted out, then a HOH competition is played out and whoever wins gets only a few minutes to evict someone, live. That is, if they have double eviction this year...might not since game is being stretched out longer, so I heard.
|
Gurliegirl
Member
06-20-2006
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 12:13 pm
No, Bbnut. They may have to nom someone right away, but the eviction itself ususally takes place on a faked live edition on the following Sunday. This is the point where in the past we've had 2 days of FOTH, Fish, Fire, Trivia, or Vortex.
|
Bbnut
Member
06-12-2006
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 12:42 pm
Oh yeah, Gurliegirl...but they only have HOH for one day. Thanks for reminding me. but basically, a lot of people seem to think that both the people on the block go home...which isn't true.
|
Stopthemadness
Member
07-15-2005
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 12:43 pm
Gurliegirl, that is how I remember double evictions going. They show a second "live" show on Sunday and a new HoH comp then noms and pov stuff on Tuesday and real live eviction on Thursday.
|
What555456
Member
06-14-2005
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 1:56 pm
Yep, that's how I remember them as well. Only I had not realized the Sunday show was a fake live one.
|
Cathie
Member
08-16-2000
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 2:32 pm
Jen said the penalty nom would take effect if she is not evicted on Thursday (she would immediately be nominated for the next week with no chance to play for VETO). Since she believed she will be evicted she saw no reason not to eat. I really don't think this was any stratigic move on her part, just a way to go ahead and eat.
|
Frogichik
Member
06-11-2002
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 2:36 pm
Please correct me if I am wrong, but from what I can tell BB changed the penalty for Jen. Instead of being automatically nominated next week with no hope of veto, she now just has an extra vote against her this week.
|
Mrsmel
Member
07-04-2007
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 2:37 pm
She should have been given a choice. Start back on the slop and only get a penalty nomination. Eat one more thing that is against the rules and you go home now.
|
Caprica
Member
02-10-2007
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 2:38 pm
I don't know why BB even bothers to carry on this charade, clearly Eric and Jessica can not win because Zach is in Dick and Daniele's back pockets, Jameka and Amber have not been playing the game the entire time and Jen has been given bad edits since day one and Eric is so sure that America hates her he has already started campaigning for her to leave. Just give the money to Dick and Daniele and put us out of our misery. This entire season has been tailored to keep D/D in the game and make them the stars of the show.
|
Sidecar
Member
07-23-2007
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 2:42 pm
Frog-from my point of view, a penalty nom this week would not make sense since she is already nominated, so an extra vote this week seems like a good compromise for this week
|
Cmist
Member
09-20-2005
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 2:47 pm
I think a reasonable decision would be immedate elimination for openly rufusing to uphold her agreement that kept her in the game when she won the veto by giving up food for slop. BB should have taken her out last night but they have left her in the house to continue to muddy the waters with her rediculas statements.
|
Cricket
Member
08-05-2002
| Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 2:52 pm
You mean her ridiculous truthful statements? Yeah, I guess BB can't be having any truth come out this year. After all, it is Alice in Wonderland theme and the truth is not part of that. Jen should not be the only houseguest getting a penalty nom. Dick should have gotten one for his remarks to her; for his dumping of tea on her head and for blowing smoke in her face and on the food she was eating. Seems like BB doesn't really like the truth at all.
|