TVCH FORUMS HOME . JOIN . FAN CLUBS . DONATE . CONTACT . CHAT  
 Wikia  Quick Links   TOPICS . TREE-VIEW . SEARCH . HELP! . NEWS . PROFILE
New Sequester Procedure

The TVClubHouse: Big Brother 7 All-Stars ARCHIVES: Big Brother 7 All-Stars Part 7: New Sequester Procedure users admin

Author Message
Bbfan05
Member

08-11-2006

Monday, September 11, 2006 - 2:50 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Bbfan05 a private message Print Post    
I was thinking that it would be cool if as a twist, the Houseguests had no idea who was going into sequester. Instead of the last 7 going into sequester, maybe the first, third, fourth, sixth, eighth, ninth, and eleventh person would make up the jury. That way, they will have no idea which people they boot out will be on the jury, and the final two won't know until they get questioned. that way, it will be trickier for the final three to decide who to kick out because they have no idea who is in the Jury House! What do you all think?

Cheekychops
Member

08-12-2005

Monday, September 11, 2006 - 2:52 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Cheekychops a private message Print Post    
That sounds like a great idea. I also think they should be allowed to watch the show - minus the DR entries.

Gina8642
Member

06-01-2001

Monday, September 11, 2006 - 2:55 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Gina8642 a private message Print Post    
If there is going to be a sequester for the purposes of "not tainting the jury" then the jury members should be kept separate from one another.

I always thought this would prevent the mob mentality we so often see in the juries. If they were kept truly separate, each member would have to judge for themselves.

I'm not sure what they should be allowed to see or not. I think someone like Will benefitted from the jury being allowed to see all. I also think Danielle would have lost either way - despite the CW around that.

ETA - also - no alcoholic beverages before the round table discussion. I don't enjoy seeing drunken tirades.

Bbfan05
Member

08-11-2006

Monday, September 11, 2006 - 3:00 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Bbfan05 a private message Print Post    
I like the Jury being together, but you're right, Gina8642, it would be more "fair" if everyone was separated. I think that might be even more interesting, seeing what people do on their own.

Meme9
Member

07-30-2001

Monday, September 11, 2006 - 5:15 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Meme9 a private message Print Post    
I think the jury should see the shows, the feeds, and the DR's.

I still like the idea of sequester, so they aren't tainted by the public and BB fans. This way they can make informed decisions when voting.

I know some jury members would be pissed if they heard others talking about them, but this could change how those still in the house played. Could be a kinder game. The jury really needs to see the game plays, and sometimes a game play requires some underhanded play. Remember this is BB. Good game play is needed to get everyone else out of the house.

Ego's should be checked at the door.LOL

Slinkydog
Member

11-30-2005

Monday, September 11, 2006 - 5:23 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Slinkydog a private message Print Post    
What if, instead of evicting other houseguests, you vote to render them ineligible to compete further, but they all continue to stay in the house?

Cliotheleo
Member

03-13-2002

Monday, September 11, 2006 - 5:25 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Cliotheleo a private message Print Post    
you vote to render them ineligible to compete further, but they all continue to stay in the house?


I've got two words for to explain why that strategy wouldn't work: Will Kirby.

Puzzled
Member

08-27-2001

Monday, September 11, 2006 - 6:38 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Puzzled a private message Print Post    
I think that's a great idea, BBfan. They really, really have to do something to make the hamsters have more of a strategy than being the biggest liar in the house.

Auntfer
Member

08-24-2005

Monday, September 11, 2006 - 7:45 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Auntfer a private message Print Post    
I think the whole season should be able to vote. I don't think there should be a sequester house. Let them see it all. The shows are edited anyway so the HG's don't see everything (unless they have live feeds).
If the remaining HG's know everyone is watching, they might act a little better. Not bad mouth each other as much.

Bbfan05
Member

08-11-2006

Monday, September 11, 2006 - 7:49 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Bbfan05 a private message Print Post    
Well, if I had it my way, I would have them go back to everyone voting too, Auntfer. I liked it that way. I hate it when the first 5 HGs just sit like bumps on a log on finale night.

I thought that it would be interesting also if the jury was comprised of all the HGS, the last 7 HGs went to sequester and voted, but the first 5 voted out ALSO voted, so there were some on the jury that saw everything and some that didn't. They should do that tomorrow night!

Puzzled
Member

08-27-2001

Monday, September 11, 2006 - 8:32 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Puzzled a private message Print Post    
LOL--BBfan--Shapiro should hire you to jazz up BB!

Bbfan05
Member

08-11-2006

Monday, September 11, 2006 - 10:26 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Bbfan05 a private message Print Post    
Hmm, it sure would be great if they at least considered some of or ideas here, huh Puzzled?

Mummy35332
Member

09-09-2005

Monday, September 11, 2006 - 10:41 pm   Edit Post Move Post Delete Post View Post Send Mummy35332 a private message Print Post    
BB I agree, Imagine the questions from those not in sequester. That would definately shake things up.