Author |
Message |
Earthmother
Member
07-13-2002
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 5:31 am
If he gets rid of Frank or Dan that would be a big move for the kid. He got rid of Boogie and to also have one of the other big guns under his belt would be epic. If he makes it to the end and the jury votes game and not personal he will win.
|
Dawn
Member
07-24-2009
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 6:11 am
what the whattttt? since when is it a rule that the HOH can NOT discuss noms with the other HGs?? i thought the rule was that you couldn't tell someone they were going up as a nom. how is Ian suppose to discuss what he should do?
|
Jabelljba
Member
07-07-2005
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 6:25 am
I don't think it's an actual rule. I think Britney said that when Janelle was on the block (that the Diary Room had told her they couldn't talk about noms). I didn't think it was true at the time, and I still don't think it's true. But I don't really know. The hg's however seem to be using it as a rule. A few of them talked about it a few days back--that it might not be a rule. And there's been some talk about it here and there through this thread. I think.
|
Nana731
Member
07-06-2005
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 6:29 am
Ian "voted" Boogie out, he didn't single handedly put him out. Even without Ian's vote, they had enough votes to get Boogie out the door. So don't think he can really take credit for that.
|
Nana731
Member
07-06-2005
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 6:32 am
Jabell, last night when Ian was talking to someone in HOH, BB came over the loud speaker and said, "Warning, and then something about you aren't allowed to talk about noms with other hg's. At least that's what I read on here. So who knows lol.
|
Dawn
Member
07-24-2009
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 6:32 am
Jab - I meant that the rule is that the HOH can not tell someone "i am nominating you" the rule that they can't tell someone they're going home is bunk. although they did say this week the DR was telling them they couldn't tell Britney but Ian told her anyways.
|
Dawn
Member
07-24-2009
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 6:33 am
although in the past they've told people "i'm putting you up as the pawn" right?? BB just needs to stop with this nonsense so that they can try to have surprises for the show.
|
Brendylou
Member
07-15-2012
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 7:09 am
BB is going to take this nonsense to the point that they aren't going to have many live feeders after this year to worry about. They come up with these kind of new rules, and fish every 60 seconds...makes me not want to bother paying money for feeds.
|
Jeff33
Member
07-05-2009
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 7:55 am
Yes in BB12, Brendan wanted to put Britney up and told someone in the house he couldnt do it because he had told Britney he was putting her up and that was against the rules.. So only the live feeders heard that.
|
Calimom3
Member
07-12-2007
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 7:56 am
When people credit Ian for Boogie's eviction, I don't think they mean his vote.... Ian is the one who alerted Brit about Boogie's comment that she/Shane were his targets...that was the catalyst for Boogie's ousting. Ian's spy work moved Boogie to the top of the Hit List.
|
Jabelljba
Member
07-07-2005
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 7:56 am
Any news on the Jury House?
|
Calimom3
Member
07-12-2007
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 8:07 am
Last night on BBAD Joe used the toilet, walked right by Shane/Dani without washing his hands! They did not even discuss it after he left... As a nurse, Dani should be disgusted...would have been a perfect opportunity for a kindergarten teacher to remind someone about the importance of hand washing ;)
|
Lostfan
Member
03-10-2010
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 8:16 am
How is Ian's target for eviction -Dan or Frank? And is he planning on BD one of them ? 
|
Mamapors
Member
07-29-2004
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 8:18 am
It appears his target is Frank. He is going to nominate Frank and Jenn, with Joe as the backup if one of them comes down.
|
Earthmother
Member
07-13-2002
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 8:22 am
I beg to differ, it was Ian who played Boogie and Frank which led to Boogie's eviction. I give the kid full credit.
|
Mamapors
Member
07-29-2004
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 8:23 am
I do not think Ian slept at all. He was still tossing and turning at 3 am, and has been up and down since I have been up.
|
Lyn
Member
08-07-2002
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 8:23 am
Is Dan back with the QP or is he pretending (as per veto agreement) so he can "save" Frank/Jenn this week?
|
Rreenn45
Member
08-31-2012
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 8:32 am
he is out for himself. that is why he had a funeral. the old dan is gone and the self centered dan is back
|
Judyelle
Member
07-08-2010
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 8:39 am
So, I take it that the "old" Dan would have laid down and died, let his so-called alliance run to the HOH and stab him in the back and not do anything to save himself? The "old" Dan would have thought that he didn't deserve the $500,000 and handed it to someone else? I don't think so. Dan plays this game the way it is supposed to played.
|
Lazylu
Member
04-09-2010
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 8:43 am
Judyelle, I agree!
|
Earthmother
Member
07-13-2002
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 8:46 am
he is out for himself. that is why he had a funeral. the old dan is gone and the self centered dan is back He didn't come into this game with the purpose of helping someone else win the money. They should all be self centered or they aren't very smart.
|
Lindaceles
Member
08-31-2006
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 8:54 am
Thank you so much Judyelle, Lazylu and Earthmother, for saying what I've been thinking for ages now!
|
Lostfan
Member
03-10-2010
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 8:56 am
Now im not a Dan fan , but As I recall Dan was playing FOR his alliance until it wasn't convenient for them- they left him out to dry - he HAD to defend for himself! He did what he had to do to survive that eviction
|
Lindaceles
Member
08-31-2006
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 8:58 am
Absolutely right Lostfan, and the last time I checked, BB is not a "team" game. Only one person wins in the end. Alliances occur for the benefit of the individual, not the group, and if you are smart, you do what will get you from one week to the next!
|
Bonbonlover
Member
07-13-2000
| Friday, August 31, 2012 - 9:01 am
Agree Judyelle.. I love to see people actually play the game!! Geeze should chess players not move their bishop if it might put the other player in check? Should you not purchase Park Place in monopoly if it precludes your opponent from placing a hotel??
|