Author |
Message |
Jimmer
Moderator
08-30-2000
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 11:20 am
I don't know whether to laugh or not over this one. Oh well ..... 
|
Lexie_girl
Member
07-30-2004
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 11:39 am
The best thing that could happen to Antonella is she gets out now before making the Final 12, so she can host Girls Gone Wild. I was under the impression that the contract "tightens up" the further along you go in the competition. I do have one thought on this whole its Antonella's boobies in the pictures, but she would never DO THAT with acrylic nails issue. I wonder if the other contestants know what is going on about this. I was thinking this morning that the contestants are probably pretty much shielded from the media at this point and maybe the only people that have discussed this are Antonella and TPTB. I could be dead wrong and they all know about it, but I was wondering if there is a possibility that none of the other contestants know about it other than Antonella and TPTB. Discuss amongst yourselves.
|
Naja
Member
06-28-2003
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 11:41 am
Fox News Idol report on the Frenchie/Antonella situation just a few mins ago. Even a clip with Rosie O' was shown. 16 MB wmv http://www.mediafire.com/?9mzlljmwznw
|
Maris
Member
03-28-2002
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 11:53 am
a little more on the Frenchie vs Antonella issue: American Idol' flap: Barba vs. Frenchie By LYNN ELBER, AP Television Writer Today at 1:40 am Frenchie Davis, dumped by "American Idol" in 2003 for lingerie shots posted on a Web site, moved on to Broadway success and thought she had buried a humiliating chapter of her young life. That changed in the last few days after contestant Antonella Barba was allowed to stay on the top-rated Fox series despite the emergence of racy online photos that purport to be of Barba, but with no verification. The first big controversy of the show's sixth season swelled Tuesday when fans and a civil-rights activist rallied to Davis' side, saying she was the victim of unfair and potentially biased treatment. Davis is black; Barba is white. <snip> "I'm not bashing `Idol' or Antonella. She's a beautiful girl and she's young. I think it's great that she didn't have to go through what I went through," said Davis, 27, who suggested that the show's producers might have learned from how they treated her. Davis would welcome a public apology from them as "a great start." But she said she is owed more for "the manner in which I was humiliated and the manner in which Antonella was defended and protected by the same people who humiliated me." "Now they need to come to the table and see what we can do to make up" for her treatment, Davis said. She declined to say if she would seek a financial settlement or a record contract or other deal. link
|
Jimmer
Moderator
08-30-2000
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 12:21 pm
Why can't people see that there is a difference between deliberately signing a release to have your picture published and someone publishing compromising pictures without permission (however, foolish or naive you may have been to allow yourself to be photographed in the first place)? Correct me if I'm wrong but Frenchie signed a release. It was a conscious decision on her part to allow her pictures to be published. To the best of my knowledge, no one took advantage of her or did anything unethical. I'm still not sure that AI's reaction was correct in Frenchie's situation, but two wrongs don't make a right.
|
Jan
Moderator
08-01-2000
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 12:27 pm
I think the confusion is that the excuse was "we are a family show and can't have anyone on who has nude pic around -etc etc" - well whether she released them or not antonella allowed the pics to be taken - and it is still a family show i still think it is more about the evolution of the show and it's ratings however. I don't think frenchie would have been kicked off if she were on this year. but I don't blame her for being mad. OT,I remember year 1 on canadian idol we had a wonderful singer with a criminal record. She was not kicked off for that - but a week or so later was kicked off because she could not travel to the USA for a couple of shows. People are routinely kicked off AI for criminal records - just a difference in philosophy I guess.
|
Ladytex
Member
09-27-2001
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 1:25 pm
Frenchie also was NOT naked, she was in lingerie, but Ms. Antonella was in fact naked in one of those pictures covering her naughty bits with her hands ... but like I said, people will continue to excuse her behavior while they continue to say Frenchie has no reason to be upset.
|
Yankee_in_ca
Member
08-01-2000
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 1:31 pm
I won't, Ladytex. Jimmer, I can totally see the difference. And to me that difference just doesn't matter. It's in the taking of the pictures. The stated "family" reasons they kicked off Frenchie seem to apply to the taking of any nude shots to me. Now, do I feel badly for Antonella? Absolutely. Entirely. But do I think that the taking of these pictures is somehow a lesser affront to the ideals of American Idol, the show and competition, than Frenchie's lingerie shots? No.
|
Jimmer
Moderator
08-30-2000
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 1:38 pm
Ladytex, On the off chance that you are referring to me, I'm neither condemning nor excusing anyone's behavior. It seems foolish to me that they would disqualify Frenchie for posing in lingerie. In Canada (and I assume in the U.S. as well) you can see pictures of women in lingerie or bikinis in advertisements in shopping centers and in store catalogues. So I'm not sure what the big deal is? However, I do understand that many Americans have a very puritanical view of sex and nudity compared to people in other countries. LOL - I guess AI won't be having Madonna on as a guest judge?
|
Maris
Member
03-28-2002
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 1:48 pm
The difference to me is that Frenchie's photos were taken for a lingere shoot for marketing purposes, the photographer then sold them to some sleazy site. To me it is all about intent. There is no question that Antonella was just goofing around with her gal pals and doing boob shots and other shots, such as drunk on toilet taking a pee. There is a world of difference. Now do I think Antonella should be booted? no of course not, but I dont think that Frenchie should have been kicked out either especially since her photos were the result of a modelling gig for a lingeree ad. Frenchie got screwed because she had no idea that her legitimate work would end up in a porn site and as far as Antonellas photos, there is no legitimate reason for them other than what they are, pics of drunken girls taking their tops off. girls gone wild so to speak
|
Naja
Member
06-28-2003
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 1:56 pm
Hmmm, to me the difference is Antonella actually appears to live the "Girls Gone Wild" lifestyle (too many clothing changes for me to believe it one or two nights of a silly innocent girl getting drunk), while Frenchie went to work for one day for a lingerie photo shoot.
|
Costacat
Member
07-15-2000
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 2:37 pm
What Naja said!
|
Texannie
Member
07-16-2001
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 2:41 pm
To me, the difference is how Idol is handling the situation. They tarred, feathered and kicked Frenchie off 'the family show'. The intent behind the pictures was never stated as the reason for the dismissal, but the very fact that the pictures existed was just cause enough. well, idol is still a family show and Antonella's pictures exist.
|
Ladytex
Member
09-27-2001
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 2:47 pm
Exactly, Texannie. And this is Frenchie's point. All the executive producers and judges have come out in support of Antonella, but Frenchie was made fun of, dismissed, and treated badly.
|
Naja
Member
06-28-2003
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 3:00 pm
I don't have any children, but it horrifies me to think that someone with children thinks it's ok for their daughter/s to act that way while away at college. Do any of you have college age daughters? What would your reaction be to those photos? Especially showing it wasn't just "one" night of being silly? Personally, I would be sick and angry, but I don't have children, only step children that are almost my own age since I married an older man.
|
Naja
Member
06-28-2003
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 3:04 pm
btw, talk about trauma....I was called "grandma" at 28, when I never even gave birth..LOL
|
Jimmer
Moderator
08-30-2000
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 3:14 pm
My kids aren't that age. However, I do have a young Cousin who has friends in college and they've done some pretty crazy things but I think they will turn out all right in the long run. They are pretty bright as well. Haven't some of the people here done some crazy stuff when they were younger? Plus with digital cameras and even cell phone cameras so ubiquitous along with the Internet, there is plenty of opportunity for this crazy stuff to get recorded for posterity and then broadcast to the world. I do think Frenchie was treated poorly by AI. 
|
Naja
Member
06-28-2003
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 3:27 pm
At this point, Jimmer, I'm leaning toward the differences should balance out and it should all be treated equally. Photos out there are photos out there, unless they were taken unknowingly. But, it appears to me, both are posing and know the camera is there.
|
Zadeira
Member
10-03-2006
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 4:18 pm
I just want to see Antonella gone. I think the stupid controversy is actually helping keep her on the show even though I have yet to hear a decent performance from her.
|
Smokey
Member
07-08-2003
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 4:55 pm
Yeah the controversy is helping her, but so is that website that votes for the bad contestants. I forget the name of it. It's the one that kept alot of contestants in that weren't all that great. As far as Frenchie, I would be pissed, too. It's not right. They should be consistant if they want those kinds of stipulations. Not that I think it's horrible that Antonella posed for those photos, but it's obvious it's not at all fair after what they did to Frenchie. As far as those toilet shots--Yuck. I have seen them, though. I think right now it's actually a cool thing to do--have yourself photographed on the toilet. I have two college aged daughters and have looked at their myspace pages and then friends of friends and I saw many, many photos of girls on the toilet. My daughters don't do this stuff (Thank God!), but I've asked them about it and they said girls think it's funny or cool. I couldn't believe it. I used to love to party when I was that age, but those kinds of photos were definitely something me and my friends avoided, not welcomed! LOL Or, it was some kind of rotten joke someone would play on someone else. The toilet person wasn't posing!
|
Zadeira
Member
10-03-2006
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 5:24 pm
Ewwww...purposely taking a pic on the toilet? Ewwww!!!! Now, I'll admit I have taken a pic or two of my sis in the bathroom. You could never see anything (and I don't think I ever caught her on the toilet). She quickly destroyed the pics (and nearly me). Like you said, a rotten joke to play on your sibling
|
Costacat
Member
07-15-2000
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 7:18 pm
It's the web site that votes for the worst. Polls I've seen say that the photos are hurting her chances to win, but you can't counterattack against VFTW unless you vote. <sigh>
|
Naja
Member
06-28-2003
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 7:21 pm
O'Reilly Report on Fox News just a few mins ago with a live interview with Frenchie. Title of the report "Contest Controversy" 20 MB wmv http://www.mediafire.com/?dmm3kzttam1 On a side note: Is Frenchie one of the few women who can go with the shaved head look and still look very pretty or what? The look isn't near as flattering for a certain blonde pop singer who is sporting it lately.
|
Naja
Member
06-28-2003
| Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 7:30 pm
you guys, this is a good one, I mean like the "scoop" one^^^
|
Seamonkey
Moderator
09-07-2000
| Thursday, March 08, 2007 - 3:48 am
One huge difference, IMO, is that Frency had mad talents and Antonella, not so much.\ Larry King was ridiculous tonight.. had two of Antonella's apologist friends and then had Elliot, Bucky and Diana. Diana was aware of the situation and is a friend of Frenchie but the guys claimed not to be at all aware but there was Larry asking their opinion. Lame. And then he kept playing clips of Antonella and saying how she must be popular. Of course no one ever mentions Vote For theWorst. The sad thing was at the beginning tonight dialidol had Antonella way down in bottom two, but as the evening went on she rose up and she's now in fourth behind Melinda, LaKisha and Gina but ahead of Jordin, Sabrina, Haley and Stephenie (I could see her being in bottom two with Haley, but for her to beat out any of the others.. tragic, especially if Stephenie or Sabrina go home)
|